public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r14-9047] c++: wrong looser excep spec for dep noexcept [PR113158]
@ 2024-02-17 14:29 Marek Polacek
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Marek Polacek @ 2024-02-17 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:876fa432ef4074053fa65b1855e7d43320515576

commit r14-9047-g876fa432ef4074053fa65b1855e7d43320515576
Author: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Feb 15 17:07:43 2024 -0500

    c++: wrong looser excep spec for dep noexcept [PR113158]
    
    Here we find ourselves in maybe_check_overriding_exception_spec in
    a template context where we can't instantiate a dependent noexcept.
    That's OK, but we have to defer the checking otherwise we give wrong
    errors.
    
            PR c++/113158
    
    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
    
            * search.cc (maybe_check_overriding_exception_spec): Defer checking
            when a noexcept couldn't be instantiated & evaluated to false/true.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept83.C: New test.

Diff:
---
 gcc/cp/search.cc                        | 11 ++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept83.C | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/search.cc b/gcc/cp/search.cc
index c948839dc533..827f48e8604f 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/search.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/search.cc
@@ -1975,6 +1975,17 @@ maybe_check_overriding_exception_spec (tree overrider, tree basefn)
       || UNPARSED_NOEXCEPT_SPEC_P (over_throw))
     return true;
 
+  /* We also have to defer checking when we're in a template and couldn't
+     instantiate & evaluate the noexcept to true/false.  */
+  if (processing_template_decl)
+    if ((base_throw
+	 && base_throw != noexcept_true_spec
+	 && base_throw != noexcept_false_spec)
+	|| (over_throw
+	    && over_throw != noexcept_true_spec
+	    && over_throw != noexcept_false_spec))
+      return true;
+
   if (!comp_except_specs (base_throw, over_throw, ce_derived))
     {
       auto_diagnostic_group d;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept83.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept83.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..47832bbb44d3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept83.C
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+// PR c++/113158
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template<typename T>
+struct V {
+  static constexpr bool t = false;
+};
+struct base {
+    virtual int f() = 0;
+};
+
+template<typename T>
+struct derived : base {
+    int f() noexcept(V<T>::t) override;
+};
+
+struct base2 {
+    virtual int f() noexcept = 0;
+};
+
+template<bool B>
+struct W {
+  static constexpr bool t = B;
+};
+
+template<bool B>
+struct derived2 : base2 {
+    int f() noexcept(W<B>::t) override; // { dg-error "looser exception specification" }
+};
+
+void
+g ()
+{
+  derived<int> d1;
+  derived2<false> d2; // { dg-message "required from here" }
+  derived2<true> d3;
+}

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-02-17 14:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-17 14:29 [gcc r14-9047] c++: wrong looser excep spec for dep noexcept [PR113158] Marek Polacek

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).