public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r14-9202] testsuite: Add c23-stdarg-4.c test variant where all functions return large struct
@ 2024-02-28 8:29 Jakub Jelinek
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2024-02-28 8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc30e24b76d570e13a71567a38f7594b104736bf
commit r14-9202-gdc30e24b76d570e13a71567a38f7594b104736bf
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Feb 28 09:26:51 2024 +0100
testsuite: Add c23-stdarg-4.c test variant where all functions return large struct
I think we have no coverage for the case where structure_value_addr_parm and
TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P are both true. The
if (type_arg_types != 0)
n_named_args
= (list_length (type_arg_types)
/* Count the struct value address, if it is passed as a parm. */
+ structure_value_addr_parm);
else if (TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P (funtype))
n_named_args = 0;
else
/* If we know nothing, treat all args as named. */
n_named_args = num_actuals;
code should probably have n_named_args = structure_value_addr_parm;
instead of n_named_args = 0;, this testcase is an attempt to see if
it is broken on any target.
2024-02-28 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
* gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c: New test.
Diff:
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c | 217 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 217 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d5f08d0f5c2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
+/* Test C23 variadic functions with no named parameters, or last named
+ parameter with a declaration not allowed in C17. Execution tests. */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=c23 -pedantic-errors" } */
+
+#include <stdarg.h>
+
+extern void abort (void);
+extern void exit (int);
+struct s { char c[1000]; };
+
+struct s
+f (...)
+{
+ va_list ap;
+ va_start (ap);
+ double r = va_arg (ap, int);
+ r += va_arg (ap, double);
+ r += va_arg (ap, int);
+ r += va_arg (ap, double);
+ va_end (ap);
+ struct s ret = {};
+ ret.c[0] = r;
+ ret.c[999] = 42;
+ return ret;
+}
+
+struct s
+g (...)
+{
+ va_list ap;
+ va_start (ap, random ! ignored, ignored ** text);
+ for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
+ if (va_arg (ap, double) != i)
+ abort ();
+ va_end (ap);
+ struct s ret = {};
+ ret.c[0] = 17;
+ ret.c[999] = 58;
+ return ret;
+}
+
+struct s
+h1 (register int x, ...)
+{
+ va_list ap;
+ va_start (ap);
+ for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
+ {
+ if (va_arg (ap, double) != i)
+ abort ();
+ i++;
+ if (va_arg (ap, int) != i)
+ abort ();
+ }
+ va_end (ap);
+ struct s ret = {};
+ ret.c[0] = 32;
+ ret.c[999] = 95;
+ return ret;
+}
+
+struct s
+h2 (int x(), ...)
+{
+ va_list ap;
+ va_start (ap);
+ for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
+ {
+ if (va_arg (ap, double) != i)
+ abort ();
+ i++;
+ if (va_arg (ap, int) != i)
+ abort ();
+ }
+ va_end (ap);
+ struct s ret = {};
+ ret.c[0] = 5;
+ ret.c[999] = 125;
+ return ret;
+}
+
+struct s
+h3 (int x[10], ...)
+{
+ va_list ap;
+ va_start (ap);
+ for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
+ {
+ if (va_arg (ap, double) != i)
+ abort ();
+ i++;
+ if (va_arg (ap, int) != i)
+ abort ();
+ }
+ va_end (ap);
+ struct s ret = {};
+ ret.c[0] = 8;
+ ret.c[999] = 12;
+ return ret;
+}
+
+struct s
+h4 (char x, ...)
+{
+ va_list ap;
+ va_start (ap);
+ for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
+ {
+ if (va_arg (ap, double) != i)
+ abort ();
+ i++;
+ if (va_arg (ap, int) != i)
+ abort ();
+ }
+ va_end (ap);
+ struct s ret = {};
+ ret.c[0] = 18;
+ ret.c[999] = 28;
+ return ret;
+}
+
+struct s
+h5 (float x, ...)
+{
+ va_list ap;
+ va_start (ap);
+ for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
+ {
+ if (va_arg (ap, double) != i)
+ abort ();
+ i++;
+ if (va_arg (ap, int) != i)
+ abort ();
+ }
+ va_end (ap);
+ struct s ret = {};
+ ret.c[0] = 38;
+ ret.c[999] = 48;
+ return ret;
+}
+
+struct s
+h6 (volatile long x, ...)
+{
+ va_list ap;
+ va_start (ap);
+ for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
+ {
+ if (va_arg (ap, double) != i)
+ abort ();
+ i++;
+ if (va_arg (ap, int) != i)
+ abort ();
+ }
+ va_end (ap);
+ struct s ret = {};
+ ret.c[0] = 58;
+ ret.c[999] = 68;
+ return ret;
+}
+
+struct s
+h7 (volatile struct s x, ...)
+{
+ va_list ap;
+ va_start (ap);
+ for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
+ {
+ if (va_arg (ap, double) != i)
+ abort ();
+ i++;
+ if (va_arg (ap, int) != i)
+ abort ();
+ }
+ va_end (ap);
+ struct s ret = {};
+ ret.c[0] = 78;
+ ret.c[999] = 88;
+ return ret;
+}
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+ struct s x = f (1, 2.0, 3, 4.0);
+ if (x.c[0] != 10 || x.c[999] != 42)
+ abort ();
+ x = g (0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0);
+ if (x.c[0] != 17 || x.c[999] != 58)
+ abort ();
+ x = g (0.0f, 1.0f, 2.0f, 3.0f, 4.0f, 5.0f, 6.0f, 7.0f, 8.0f, 9.0f);
+ if (x.c[0] != 17 || x.c[999] != 58)
+ abort ();
+ x = h1 (0, 0.0, 1, 2.0, 3, 4.0, 5, 6.0, 7, 8.0, 9);
+ if (x.c[0] != 32 || x.c[999] != 95)
+ abort ();
+ x = h2 (0, 0.0, 1, 2.0, 3, 4.0, 5, 6.0, 7, 8.0, 9);
+ if (x.c[0] != 5 || x.c[999] != 125)
+ abort ();
+ x = h3 (0, 0.0, 1, 2.0, 3, 4.0, 5, 6.0, 7, 8.0, 9);
+ if (x.c[0] != 8 || x.c[999] != 12)
+ abort ();
+ x = h4 (0, 0.0, 1, 2.0, 3, 4.0, 5, 6.0, 7, 8.0, 9);
+ if (x.c[0] != 18 || x.c[999] != 28)
+ abort ();
+ x = h5 (0, 0.0, 1, 2.0, 3, 4.0, 5, 6.0, 7, 8.0, 9);
+ if (x.c[0] != 38 || x.c[999] != 48)
+ abort ();
+ x = h6 (0, 0.0, 1, 2.0, 3, 4.0, 5, 6.0, 7, 8.0, 9);
+ if (x.c[0] != 58 || x.c[999] != 68)
+ abort ();
+ x = h7 ((struct s) {}, 0.0, 1, 2.0, 3, 4.0, 5, 6.0, 7, 8.0, 9);
+ if (x.c[0] != 78 || x.c[999] != 88)
+ abort ();
+ exit (0);
+}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-02-28 8:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-28 8:29 [gcc r14-9202] testsuite: Add c23-stdarg-4.c test variant where all functions return large struct Jakub Jelinek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).