[gcc r15-32] Make fold_cond_with_ops use a boolean type for range_true/range_false.

[gcc r15-32] Make fold_cond_with_ops use a boolean type for range_true/range_false.

[Aldy Hernandez]

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:039e88b1aea5723221e8b0b926c35afb2f96a8a9

commit r15-32-g039e88b1aea5723221e8b0b926c35afb2f96a8a9
Author: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Feb 7 11:27:29 2024 +0100

    Make fold_cond_with_ops use a boolean type for range_true/range_false.
    
    Conditional operators are always boolean, regardless of their
    operands.  Getting the type wrong is not currently a problem, but will
    be when prange's can no longer store an integer.
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
            * vr-values.cc (simplify_using_ranges::fold_cond_with_ops): Remove
            type from range_true and range_false.

Diff:
---
 gcc/vr-values.cc | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/vr-values.cc b/gcc/vr-values.cc
index a7e291a16e5..ff68d40c355 100644
--- a/gcc/vr-values.cc
+++ b/gcc/vr-values.cc
@@ -320,9 +320,9 @@ simplify_using_ranges::fold_cond_with_ops (enum tree_code code,
   range_op_handler handler (code);
   if (handler && handler.fold_range (res, type, r0, r1))
     {
-      if (res == range_true (type))
+      if (res == range_true ())
 	return boolean_true_node;
-      if (res == range_false (type))
+      if (res == range_false ())
 	return boolean_false_node;
     }
   return NULL;