Problem with includes during build

Problem with includes during build

[Scott Ballantyne]

I'm trying to build gcc 2.95.2 on sparc-unknown-openbsd2.6, which
ships with gcc 2.95.1.

It seems that there is a problem with fixincludes, which modifies
stdio.h to reference __gnuc_va_list and _BSD_DUMMY_VA_LIST, but does
not provide for a definition for either of these symbols. This causes
make bootstrap to fail during the tmplibgcc2.a portion of the build,
specifically when trying to generate the _eprintf.o file.

They are defined in _srcdir_/gcc/ginclude/stdarg.h, but this directory
is not included in the -I paths for xgcc.

I'm not sure if this is my error, or a problem in this distribution
which needs to be corrected, or what a good work around would be for
me at the present time, since I haven't followed the progress of the
fixinc work.

I'm wondering also, if fixinc is not doing more work than is optimal
for OpenBSD2.6...

Thanks in advance for your suggestions.

sdb

Problem with includes during build

[Scott Ballantyne]

I'm trying to build gcc 2.95.2 on sparc-unknown-openbsd2.6, which
ships with gcc 2.95.1.

It seems that there is a problem with fixincludes, which modifies
stdio.h to reference __gnuc_va_list and _BSD_DUMMY_VA_LIST, but does
not provide for a definition for either of these symbols. This causes
make bootstrap to fail during the tmplibgcc2.a portion of the build,
specifically when trying to generate the _eprintf.o file.

They are defined in _srcdir_/gcc/ginclude/stdarg.h, but this directory
is not included in the -I paths for xgcc.

I'm not sure if this is my error, or a problem in this distribution
which needs to be corrected, or what a good work around would be for
me at the present time, since I haven't followed the progress of the
fixinc work.

I'm wondering also, if fixinc is not doing more work than is optimal
for OpenBSD2.6...

Thanks in advance for your suggestions.

sdb