public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: Re: why gcj is slower than jvm
@ 2003-09-03  6:54 guw
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: guw @ 2003-09-03  6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Sturm; +Cc: gcc

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 837 bytes --]

hello Jeff Sturm

thanks.

But.
Where can represent the GCJ runtime performance and compiler optimization?
and
How represent the GCJ runtime performance and compiler optimization?

thanks.

======= 2003-09-03 02:34:00 ：=======

>On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, guw wrote:
>> I write a JAVA programme and compile it with GCJ. then I compare
>> GCJ's performance with JVM'performance,but I discover that the procedure
>> to be GCJ compiled is slower than JVM.
>
>Your example is more of a comparison of runtime performance than compiler
>optimization.  From your results one might conclude that the JVM has a
>better MD-5 implementation than libjava, but little else.
>
>Jeff

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
			

　　　　　　		
　　　　　　　　guw
　　　　　　　　guw@koal.com
　　　　　　　　　　2003-09-03


[-- Attachment #2: Rabbit.GIF --]
[-- Type: image/gif, Size: 1488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: why gcj is slower than jvm
@ 2003-09-03  6:54 guw
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: guw @ 2003-09-03  6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Sturm; +Cc: gcc

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 837 bytes --]

hello Jeff Sturm

thanks.

But.
Where can represent the GCJ runtime performance and compiler optimization?
and
How represent the GCJ runtime performance and compiler optimization?

thanks.

======= 2003-09-03 02:34:00 ：=======

>On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, guw wrote:
>> I write a JAVA programme and compile it with GCJ. then I compare
>> GCJ's performance with JVM'performance,but I discover that the procedure
>> to be GCJ compiled is slower than JVM.
>
>Your example is more of a comparison of runtime performance than compiler
>optimization.  From your results one might conclude that the JVM has a
>better MD-5 implementation than libjava, but little else.
>
>Jeff

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
			

　　　　　　		
　　　　　　　　guw
　　　　　　　　guw@koal.com
　　　　　　　　　　2003-09-03


[-- Attachment #2: Rabbit.GIF --]
[-- Type: image/gif, Size: 1488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-03  6:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-03  6:54 Re: why gcj is slower than jvm guw
2003-09-03  6:54 guw

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).