public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: stuarts@icpdd.neca.nec.com.au (Stuart Summerville)
To: help-gcc@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Need help building & integrating library into target program
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 1999 14:14:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <38541c04.153226041@news.mul.nec.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <385169EA.2D7A2565@bga.com>

(More apologies for re-posts - seemingly posting to the mailing list ain't the
same as posting to the usenet newsgroup...)


>It would be best to show us how you're trying to link against the
>library; knowing your platform would also be helpful.
>--ag
>

Hi Arthur,

Given that I have mylib.a in the current directory, I issue the command:

gcc -static -g -o rw startup_lib.a

to produce the rw executable. Then, issuing the command:

ldd rw

tells me that this dynamically linked executable is dependent on mylib.o. I
presume that as its linked statically, there shouldn't be any lib dependence....

Tools used:
Solaris 2.5.1
gcc egcs-2.91.57 19980901 (egcs-1.1 release)
ld 2.8.1 (with BFD 2.8.1)

Also, mylib.a was created in the following manner:

gcc -MD -I../include -g -o init.o -c init.c
ar rv ../../../obj/mylib.a *.o

I've seen the same behaviour on two Sol251 boxes.

To contrast this, if I do the same thing on a Redhat Linux (5.2) box (gcc =
2.7.2.3, ld = 2.9.1 (with BFD 2.9.1.0.15)), it works fine. If statically linked,
ldd won't touch it (unlike the Solaris box, which still shows that erroneous
dependence) & it runs properly; if dynamically linked, ldd reports that libc and
ld-linux are linked but no mylib.a (or even mylib.o).

?

Some other questions:

1) does linking of libraries dynamically only affect files specified with the -l
switch to ld? Can a file specified as an ordinary object file to ld, be
dynamically linked in? eg. if I don't supply ld with the -static switch, will
archive files passed in the manner "ld -o myprog mylib.a ..." be statically
linked anyway?
2) Is there any use in my creating arcive/object files with the -shared switch
to ld? This seems to be a useful thing to do, but the ld manpage suggests its
not a common method anymore.

Thanks,

sTu.

_________________________________________________________________________
Stuart Summerville                         NEC Australia Pty. Ltd.
ph: (+61 3) 9264-3090                      Integrated Comm Products (R&D)
fax:(+61 3) 9264-3841                      649-655 Springvale Road
e-mail: stuarts@icpdd.neca.nec.com.au      Mulgrave, VIC 3170, AUSTRALIA  
________________________________________________________________________
Stuart Summerville                     NEC Australia Pty. Ltd.
ph: (+61 3) 9264-3090                  Integrated Comm Products (R&D)
fax:(+61 3) 9264-3841                  649-655 Springvale Road Mulgrave
stuarts@<nospam>icpdd.neca.nec.com.au  VIC 3170, AUSTRALIA

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: stuarts@icpdd.neca.nec.com.au (Stuart Summerville)
To: help-gcc@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Need help building & integrating library into target program
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 22:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <38541c04.153226041@news.mul.nec.com.au> (raw)
Message-ID: <19991231222400.V1jJRPFjWHC_Rtk0P8N63-MZ2kvvSyUBXfDeRlf02E8@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <385169EA.2D7A2565@bga.com>

(More apologies for re-posts - seemingly posting to the mailing list ain't the
same as posting to the usenet newsgroup...)


>It would be best to show us how you're trying to link against the
>library; knowing your platform would also be helpful.
>--ag
>

Hi Arthur,

Given that I have mylib.a in the current directory, I issue the command:

gcc -static -g -o rw startup_lib.a

to produce the rw executable. Then, issuing the command:

ldd rw

tells me that this dynamically linked executable is dependent on mylib.o. I
presume that as its linked statically, there shouldn't be any lib dependence....

Tools used:
Solaris 2.5.1
gcc egcs-2.91.57 19980901 (egcs-1.1 release)
ld 2.8.1 (with BFD 2.8.1)

Also, mylib.a was created in the following manner:

gcc -MD -I../include -g -o init.o -c init.c
ar rv ../../../obj/mylib.a *.o

I've seen the same behaviour on two Sol251 boxes.

To contrast this, if I do the same thing on a Redhat Linux (5.2) box (gcc =
2.7.2.3, ld = 2.9.1 (with BFD 2.9.1.0.15)), it works fine. If statically linked,
ldd won't touch it (unlike the Solaris box, which still shows that erroneous
dependence) & it runs properly; if dynamically linked, ldd reports that libc and
ld-linux are linked but no mylib.a (or even mylib.o).

?

Some other questions:

1) does linking of libraries dynamically only affect files specified with the -l
switch to ld? Can a file specified as an ordinary object file to ld, be
dynamically linked in? eg. if I don't supply ld with the -static switch, will
archive files passed in the manner "ld -o myprog mylib.a ..." be statically
linked anyway?
2) Is there any use in my creating arcive/object files with the -shared switch
to ld? This seems to be a useful thing to do, but the ld manpage suggests its
not a common method anymore.

Thanks,

sTu.

_________________________________________________________________________
Stuart Summerville                         NEC Australia Pty. Ltd.
ph: (+61 3) 9264-3090                      Integrated Comm Products (R&D)
fax:(+61 3) 9264-3841                      649-655 Springvale Road
e-mail: stuarts@icpdd.neca.nec.com.au      Mulgrave, VIC 3170, AUSTRALIA  
________________________________________________________________________
Stuart Summerville                     NEC Australia Pty. Ltd.
ph: (+61 3) 9264-3090                  Integrated Comm Products (R&D)
fax:(+61 3) 9264-3841                  649-655 Springvale Road Mulgrave
stuarts@<nospam>icpdd.neca.nec.com.au  VIC 3170, AUSTRALIA

  reply	other threads:[~1999-12-12 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-12-10  0:21 Stuart Summerville
1999-12-10 13:02 ` Arthur Gold
1999-12-12 14:14   ` Stuart Summerville [this message]
1999-12-12 15:56     ` Stuart Summerville
1999-12-31 22:24       ` Stuart Summerville
1999-12-31 22:24     ` Stuart Summerville
1999-12-31 22:24   ` Arthur Gold
1999-12-31 22:24 ` Stuart Summerville
1999-12-11  2:42 Stuart Summerville (Deimus)
1999-12-31 22:24 ` Stuart Summerville (Deimus)
1999-12-11 12:14 Stuart Summerville (NEC)
1999-12-31 22:24 ` Stuart Summerville (NEC)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=38541c04.153226041@news.mul.nec.com.au \
    --to=stuarts@icpdd.neca.nec.com.au \
    --cc=help-gcc@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).