* LOTS of failures when making check for gfortran--is it Ok?
@ 2006-06-23 9:10 sean yang
2006-06-23 9:14 ` Andrew Haley
2006-06-23 10:41 ` tobias.schlueter
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: sean yang @ 2006-06-23 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help; +Cc: fortran
I successfully compile a GCC4.0.2 with Fortran front end. I tried to use it
to compile some fortran programs, so far all of them work fine.
But the make check gave lots of failure. Is it tolerable to have thousands
of failure?
objgcc-4.0.2>make -k check 1>record.tmp
objgcc-4.0.2>cat record.tmp
71 === gcc Summary ===
72
73 # of expected passes 35255
74 # of unexpected successes 1
75 # of expected failures 94
76 # of untested testcases 28
77 # of unsupported tests 328
4579 === gfortran Summary ===
4580
4581 # of expected passes 46
4582 # of unexpected failures 4475
4583 # of expected failures 1
4584 # of unresolved testcases 2
4585 # of untested testcases 1527
....
4679
4680 === libmudflap Summary ===
4681
4682 # of expected passes 1212
4683 # of unexpected failures 48
....
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: LOTS of failures when making check for gfortran--is it Ok?
2006-06-23 9:10 LOTS of failures when making check for gfortran--is it Ok? sean yang
@ 2006-06-23 9:14 ` Andrew Haley
2006-06-23 10:41 ` tobias.schlueter
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Haley @ 2006-06-23 9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sean yang; +Cc: gcc-help, fortran
sean yang writes:
> I successfully compile a GCC4.0.2 with Fortran front end. I tried to use it
> to compile some fortran programs, so far all of them work fine.
>
> But the make check gave lots of failure. Is it tolerable to have thousands
> of failure?
No. You need to look at the log to see what the failures were.
Andrew.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: LOTS of failures when making check for gfortran--is it Ok?
2006-06-23 9:10 LOTS of failures when making check for gfortran--is it Ok? sean yang
2006-06-23 9:14 ` Andrew Haley
@ 2006-06-23 10:41 ` tobias.schlueter
2006-06-23 13:36 ` Tim Prince
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: tobias.schlueter @ 2006-06-23 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sean yang; +Cc: gcc-help, fortran
sean yang <seanatpurdue@hotmail.com> wrote on Fri, 23 Jun 2006:
> I successfully compile a GCC4.0.2 with Fortran front end. I tried to
> use it to compile some fortran programs, so far all of them work fine.
>
> But the make check gave lots of failure. Is it tolerable to have
> thousands of failure?
No, this means that something's broken in your build, and the compiler
is probably not usable. Nevertheless, you may want to use at least
gcc 4.1.1, as the gfortran that comes with gcc 4.0.x isn't really
usable, even if the testsuite passes cleanly.
- Tobi
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: LOTS of failures when making check for gfortran--is it Ok?
2006-06-23 10:41 ` tobias.schlueter
@ 2006-06-23 13:36 ` Tim Prince
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tim Prince @ 2006-06-23 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tobias.schlueter; +Cc: sean yang, gcc-help, fortran
tobias.schlueter@physik.uni-muenchen.de wrote:
> sean yang <seanatpurdue@hotmail.com> wrote on Fri, 23 Jun 2006:
>> I successfully compile a GCC4.0.2 with Fortran front end. I tried to
>> use it to compile some fortran programs, so far all of them work fine.
>>
>> But the make check gave lots of failure. Is it tolerable to have
>> thousands of failure?
>
> No, this means that something's broken in your build, and the compiler
> is probably not usable. Nevertheless, you may want to use at least gcc
> 4.1.1, as the gfortran that comes with gcc 4.0.x isn't really usable,
> even if the testsuite passes cleanly.
>
Regardless of version, testsuite will show unsatisfactory results if
your build did not complete, for example if you didn't build
libgfortran. But you have been ignoring plenty of questions on why you
are trying to build this broken version, so I expect today's replies to
be ignored as well.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-06-23 13:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-06-23 9:10 LOTS of failures when making check for gfortran--is it Ok? sean yang
2006-06-23 9:14 ` Andrew Haley
2006-06-23 10:41 ` tobias.schlueter
2006-06-23 13:36 ` Tim Prince
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).