* When is GCC 2.95.3 due?
@ 1999-12-29 9:46 Victor Danilchenko
1999-12-29 10:02 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-12-31 22:24 ` Victor Danilchenko
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Victor Danilchenko @ 1999-12-29 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gcc
Can anyone give me a ballpark figure?.. A couple of weeks, a couple of
months? I need it only because I have to decide if I should build GCC
2.95.2 now for my department (on 8 different platforms -- so it's a
major undertaking), or If I should wait for a couple of weeks until
2.95.3 comes out. I do have to rebuild it because our g++-3 include path
is broken, so I figured that if I am going to recompile, I should
combine that with an upgrade.
Any insights would be much appreciated. This is not info that I would
try to use in any manner but a ballpark guide to a single decision.
which decision can be made either way anyway.
--
Victor Danilchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: When is GCC 2.95.3 due?
1999-12-29 9:46 When is GCC 2.95.3 due? Victor Danilchenko
@ 1999-12-29 10:02 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-12-29 11:48 ` Victor Danilchenko
1999-12-31 22:24 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-12-31 22:24 ` Victor Danilchenko
1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1999-12-29 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Victor Danilchenko; +Cc: help-gcc
In message < 386A4814.3FB04C6D@cs.umass.edu >you write:
> Can anyone give me a ballpark figure?.. A couple of weeks, a couple of
> months?
It has not been decided if there will be a gcc-2.95.3 release or not.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: When is GCC 2.95.3 due?
1999-12-29 10:02 ` Jeffrey A Law
@ 1999-12-29 11:48 ` Victor Danilchenko
1999-12-31 22:24 ` Victor Danilchenko
1999-12-31 22:24 ` Jeffrey A Law
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Victor Danilchenko @ 1999-12-29 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeffrey A Law; +Cc: help-gcc
On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
>
> In message < 386A4814.3FB04C6D@cs.umass.edu >you write:
> > Can anyone give me a ballpark figure?.. A couple of weeks, a couple of
> > months?
>It has not been decided if there will be a gcc-2.95.3 release or not.
Excellent. Thank you very much. I will start building gcc
2.95.2 right away.
--
Victor Danilchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: When is GCC 2.95.3 due?
1999-12-29 11:48 ` Victor Danilchenko
@ 1999-12-31 22:24 ` Victor Danilchenko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Victor Danilchenko @ 1999-12-31 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeffrey A Law; +Cc: help-gcc
On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
>
> In message < 386A4814.3FB04C6D@cs.umass.edu >you write:
> > Can anyone give me a ballpark figure?.. A couple of weeks, a couple of
> > months?
>It has not been decided if there will be a gcc-2.95.3 release or not.
Excellent. Thank you very much. I will start building gcc
2.95.2 right away.
--
Victor Danilchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: When is GCC 2.95.3 due?
1999-12-29 10:02 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-12-29 11:48 ` Victor Danilchenko
@ 1999-12-31 22:24 ` Jeffrey A Law
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1999-12-31 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Victor Danilchenko; +Cc: help-gcc
In message < 386A4814.3FB04C6D@cs.umass.edu >you write:
> Can anyone give me a ballpark figure?.. A couple of weeks, a couple of
> months?
It has not been decided if there will be a gcc-2.95.3 release or not.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* When is GCC 2.95.3 due?
1999-12-29 9:46 When is GCC 2.95.3 due? Victor Danilchenko
1999-12-29 10:02 ` Jeffrey A Law
@ 1999-12-31 22:24 ` Victor Danilchenko
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Victor Danilchenko @ 1999-12-31 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gcc
Can anyone give me a ballpark figure?.. A couple of weeks, a couple of
months? I need it only because I have to decide if I should build GCC
2.95.2 now for my department (on 8 different platforms -- so it's a
major undertaking), or If I should wait for a couple of weeks until
2.95.3 comes out. I do have to rebuild it because our g++-3 include path
is broken, so I figured that if I am going to recompile, I should
combine that with an upgrade.
Any insights would be much appreciated. This is not info that I would
try to use in any manner but a ballpark guide to a single decision.
which decision can be made either way anyway.
--
Victor Danilchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1999-12-31 22:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-12-29 9:46 When is GCC 2.95.3 due? Victor Danilchenko
1999-12-29 10:02 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-12-29 11:48 ` Victor Danilchenko
1999-12-31 22:24 ` Victor Danilchenko
1999-12-31 22:24 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-12-31 22:24 ` Victor Danilchenko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).