From: "Jeff Dickens" <jdickens@ersi.com>
To: help-gcc@gnu.org
Subject: Re: building gcc 2.95.2 - genattrtab.c - INT_MAX undeclared - help!
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 09:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <828t9h$6d1$0@dosa.alt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <828pnp$oe6$0@dosa.alt.net>
genattrtab.c includes system.h.
In system.h, I find this:
#if HAVE_LIMITS_H
# include <limits.h>
#endif
Who decides if "HAVE_LIMITS_H" should be defined ? And why would this
decision be no ?
Also,genattrtab.c includes sys/resource.h.
sys/resource.h includes sys/time.h which includes sys/types.h, which does
contain INT_MAX, but only inside
"#if defined(_KERNEL)".
Jeff Dickens <jdickens@ersi.com> wrote in message
news: 828pnp$oe6$0@dosa.alt.net ...
> I'm building gcc 2.95.2 on NCR System V MP-RAS V3.02.
>
> I'm using the NCR c compiler to build gcc:
> NCR High Performance C Compiler R3.0c
>
> I soft-linked in all the binutils components, and building those seemed to
> go fine.
>
> Then when it went on to compiling gcc, it failed on genattrtab.c:
>
>
cc -c -DIN_GCC -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../gcc-2.95.2/gcc -I../.
> ./gc
> c-2.95.2/gcc/config -I../../gcc-2.95.2/gcc/../include
> ../../gcc-2.95.2/gcc/genat
> trtab.c
> .
> .
> E "../../gcc-2.95.2/gcc/genattrtab.c",L4733/C21(#237): INT_MAX:
Identifier
> is u
> ndeclared.
> .
> .
> 1 user error 192 warnings
> make[2]: *** [genattrtab.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build1/ersbuild/src/gcc-2.95.2-build/gcc'
> make[1]: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build1/ersbuild/src/gcc-2.95.2-build/gcc'
> make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
>
> (I removed the 192 warnings to improve readability)
>
>
> INT_MAX is defined in /usr/include/limits.h. Why would't it find that ?
>
> thanks...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: "Jeff Dickens" <jdickens@ersi.com>
To: help-gcc@gnu.org
Subject: Re: building gcc 2.95.2 - genattrtab.c - INT_MAX undeclared - help!
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 22:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <828t9h$6d1$0@dosa.alt.net> (raw)
Message-ID: <19991231222400.jV6NYdy4Um8F3YKKdcDawrqQKJra1SI2FlzMlNEjxUo@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <828pnp$oe6$0@dosa.alt.net>
genattrtab.c includes system.h.
In system.h, I find this:
#if HAVE_LIMITS_H
# include <limits.h>
#endif
Who decides if "HAVE_LIMITS_H" should be defined ? And why would this
decision be no ?
Also,genattrtab.c includes sys/resource.h.
sys/resource.h includes sys/time.h which includes sys/types.h, which does
contain INT_MAX, but only inside
"#if defined(_KERNEL)".
Jeff Dickens <jdickens@ersi.com> wrote in message
news: 828pnp$oe6$0@dosa.alt.net ...
> I'm building gcc 2.95.2 on NCR System V MP-RAS V3.02.
>
> I'm using the NCR c compiler to build gcc:
> NCR High Performance C Compiler R3.0c
>
> I soft-linked in all the binutils components, and building those seemed to
> go fine.
>
> Then when it went on to compiling gcc, it failed on genattrtab.c:
>
>
cc -c -DIN_GCC -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../gcc-2.95.2/gcc -I../.
> ./gc
> c-2.95.2/gcc/config -I../../gcc-2.95.2/gcc/../include
> ../../gcc-2.95.2/gcc/genat
> trtab.c
> .
> .
> E "../../gcc-2.95.2/gcc/genattrtab.c",L4733/C21(#237): INT_MAX:
Identifier
> is u
> ndeclared.
> .
> .
> 1 user error 192 warnings
> make[2]: *** [genattrtab.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build1/ersbuild/src/gcc-2.95.2-build/gcc'
> make[1]: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build1/ersbuild/src/gcc-2.95.2-build/gcc'
> make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
>
> (I removed the 192 warnings to improve readability)
>
>
> INT_MAX is defined in /usr/include/limits.h. Why would't it find that ?
>
> thanks...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-12-03 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-12-03 8:10 Jeff Dickens
1999-12-03 9:10 ` Jeff Dickens [this message]
1999-12-06 8:08 ` Jeff Dickens
1999-12-31 22:24 ` Jeff Dickens
1999-12-31 22:24 ` Jeff Dickens
1999-12-31 22:24 ` Jeff Dickens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='828t9h$6d1$0@dosa.alt.net' \
--to=jdickens@ersi.com \
--cc=help-gcc@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).