public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: khan@xraylith.wisc.edu (Mumit Khan)
To: help-gcc@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Forcing thrown exceptions to core dump without stack unwinding?
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 23:13:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <82aecc$cpq$1@news.doit.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <829qlj$80e@spool.cs.wisc.edu>

In article < 829qlj$80e@spool.cs.wisc.edu >, Andy Glew <glew@cs.wisc.edu> wrote:
>I'm using GCC 2.95.
>Q: is there a way of forcing thrown exceptions to core dump
>at the site of the exception - so that I can get a useful core dump
>I can look at in a debugger?

This is IMO a real issue with current EH implementation in GCC. One way
to fix is to implement a dual pass: (1) "virtually" unwind the stack
looking for a handler, and (2) if found, call the handler; if not, call
terminate in the context of the current frame. Essentially, you get a 
C-like assertion if you don't have a handler for that exception.

>My program may run for many days before the core dump (or not).
>It is impractical to run them in a debugger set to break at the first
>exception. Since the exceptions seem to be arising in library functions
>I have not written, it is impractical to change the code to optionally
>not throw.

I know the feeling. I have numercial codes that runs from days to weeks
at a time, and it's very frustrating when you can't pinpoint where things
went wrong. You can get around *some of it* by inserting "catch all"
blocks around library codes, but it's still messy. 

>Please email to glew@cs.wisc.edu

And posted of course.

Regards,
Mumit

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: khan@xraylith.wisc.edu (Mumit Khan)
To: help-gcc@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Forcing thrown exceptions to core dump without stack unwinding?
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 22:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <82aecc$cpq$1@news.doit.wisc.edu> (raw)
Message-ID: <19991231222400.VQhcW4faKvJ2MNcGFnvflvoDZCj0iOhGIXSU0B7cM7Q@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <829qlj$80e@spool.cs.wisc.edu>

In article < 829qlj$80e@spool.cs.wisc.edu >, Andy Glew <glew@cs.wisc.edu> wrote:
>I'm using GCC 2.95.
>Q: is there a way of forcing thrown exceptions to core dump
>at the site of the exception - so that I can get a useful core dump
>I can look at in a debugger?

This is IMO a real issue with current EH implementation in GCC. One way
to fix is to implement a dual pass: (1) "virtually" unwind the stack
looking for a handler, and (2) if found, call the handler; if not, call
terminate in the context of the current frame. Essentially, you get a 
C-like assertion if you don't have a handler for that exception.

>My program may run for many days before the core dump (or not).
>It is impractical to run them in a debugger set to break at the first
>exception. Since the exceptions seem to be arising in library functions
>I have not written, it is impractical to change the code to optionally
>not throw.

I know the feeling. I have numercial codes that runs from days to weeks
at a time, and it's very frustrating when you can't pinpoint where things
went wrong. You can get around *some of it* by inserting "catch all"
blocks around library codes, but it's still messy. 

>Please email to glew@cs.wisc.edu

And posted of course.

Regards,
Mumit

  reply	other threads:[~1999-12-03 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-12-03 17:33 Andy Glew
1999-12-03 23:13 ` Mumit Khan [this message]
1999-12-31 22:24   ` Mumit Khan
1999-12-31 22:24 ` Andy Glew

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='82aecc$cpq$1@news.doit.wisc.edu' \
    --to=khan@xraylith.wisc.edu \
    --cc=help-gcc@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).