public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lance Fredrickson <lancethepants@gmail.com>
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Building a host-isolated gcc without faking cross-compiling
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 11:46:44 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86a5dbe8-28c1-3113-b585-4e195c3f6534@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2f59101-89e1-e7b2-d4ee-c748a9b633a5@falsifiable.net>

I think you probably want |--with-native-system-header-dir

|
|--with-native-system-header-dir=dirname|

    Specifies thatdirnameis the directory that contains native system
    header files, rather than/usr/include. This option is most useful if
    you are creating a compiler that should be isolated from the system
    as much as possible. It is most commonly used with
    the--with-sysrootoption and will cause GCC to searchdirnameinside
    the system root specified by that option.

Lance

On 9/10/2021 10:54 AM, Anthony de Almeida Lopes via Gcc-help wrote:
> I'd like to build gcc for a chroot on my current system. Linux From
> Scratch uses a method of faking a cross compiler by modifying the vendor
> field of the target string. For example, changing x86_64-pc-linux-gnu to
> x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu. I'd like to know if there's a way of avoiding
> this. While GCC builds fine for my host natively and it builds fine with
> the LFS method, I have so far been unable to build a host isolated copy
> any other way.
>
> I understand the recommended order is to build binutils and gcc first,
> then build glibc with them and finally rebuild gcc against that glibc.
>
> # I built binutils like this
>
> ../configure   \
>      --prefix=$DISTRO/root/bootstrap \
>      --with-sysroot=$DISTRO  \
>      --disable-nls \
>      --disable-werror
>
> && make -j6 && make -j1 install
>
> # Then I tried to build gcc like this
>
> ../configure                                       \
>       --prefix=$DISTRO/tools                         \
>       --with-glibc-version=2.11                      \
>       --with-sysroot=$DISTRO                         \
>       --with-newlib                                  \
>       --without-headers                              \
>       --enable-initfini-array                        \
>       --disable-nls                                  \
>       --disable-shared                               \
>       --disable-multilib                             \
>       --disable-decimal-float                        \
>       --disable-threads                              \
>       --disable-libatomic                            \
>       --disable-libgomp                              \
>       --disable-libquadmath                          \
>       --disable-libssp                               \
>       --disable-libvtv                               \
>       --disable-libstdcxx                            \
>       --enable-languages=c,c++
>
> && make -j6 && make -j1 install
>
> But this fails with a bunch of undefined references to the ZSTD
> namespace such as ZSTD_getErrorName from gcc/lto-compress.c. I assume
> this means that ./configure has detected that my host system has libzstd
> but it's trying to look for them in the sysroot, where it obviously
> can't find them. This happens even if I use --disable-lto.
>
> Build System (Arch Linux): linux 5.13.13, glibc 2.33, binutils 2.36.1,
> gcc 11.1.0
> Target System: linux 5.13.12, glibc 2.34, binutils 2.37, gcc 11.2.0
>
> So I'd like to know if I should continue like this, and if so how, or if
> there is a better (maybe canonical) way of building a host-isolated
> compiler?
>
> - Anthony
>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-10 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-10 16:54 Anthony de Almeida Lopes
2021-09-10 17:46 ` Lance Fredrickson [this message]
2021-09-10 18:21   ` Anthony de Almeida Lopes
2021-09-10 18:42     ` Lance Fredrickson
2021-09-11  4:55       ` Anthony de Almeida Lopes
2021-09-11  8:32         ` Xi Ruoyao
2021-09-13 14:06           ` Anthony de Almeida Lopes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86a5dbe8-28c1-3113-b585-4e195c3f6534@gmail.com \
    --to=lancethepants@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).