From: Anthony de Almeida Lopes <anthony.de.almeida.lopes@falsifiable.net>
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Building a host-isolated gcc without faking cross-compiling
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:54:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2f59101-89e1-e7b2-d4ee-c748a9b633a5@falsifiable.net> (raw)
I'd like to build gcc for a chroot on my current system. Linux From
Scratch uses a method of faking a cross compiler by modifying the vendor
field of the target string. For example, changing x86_64-pc-linux-gnu to
x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu. I'd like to know if there's a way of avoiding
this. While GCC builds fine for my host natively and it builds fine with
the LFS method, I have so far been unable to build a host isolated copy
any other way.
I understand the recommended order is to build binutils and gcc first,
then build glibc with them and finally rebuild gcc against that glibc.
# I built binutils like this
../configure \
--prefix=$DISTRO/root/bootstrap \
--with-sysroot=$DISTRO \
--disable-nls \
--disable-werror
&& make -j6 && make -j1 install
# Then I tried to build gcc like this
../configure \
--prefix=$DISTRO/tools \
--with-glibc-version=2.11 \
--with-sysroot=$DISTRO \
--with-newlib \
--without-headers \
--enable-initfini-array \
--disable-nls \
--disable-shared \
--disable-multilib \
--disable-decimal-float \
--disable-threads \
--disable-libatomic \
--disable-libgomp \
--disable-libquadmath \
--disable-libssp \
--disable-libvtv \
--disable-libstdcxx \
--enable-languages=c,c++
&& make -j6 && make -j1 install
But this fails with a bunch of undefined references to the ZSTD
namespace such as ZSTD_getErrorName from gcc/lto-compress.c. I assume
this means that ./configure has detected that my host system has libzstd
but it's trying to look for them in the sysroot, where it obviously
can't find them. This happens even if I use --disable-lto.
Build System (Arch Linux): linux 5.13.13, glibc 2.33, binutils 2.36.1,
gcc 11.1.0
Target System: linux 5.13.12, glibc 2.34, binutils 2.37, gcc 11.2.0
So I'd like to know if I should continue like this, and if so how, or if
there is a better (maybe canonical) way of building a host-isolated
compiler?
- Anthony
next reply other threads:[~2021-09-10 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-10 16:54 Anthony de Almeida Lopes [this message]
2021-09-10 17:46 ` Lance Fredrickson
2021-09-10 18:21 ` Anthony de Almeida Lopes
2021-09-10 18:42 ` Lance Fredrickson
2021-09-11 4:55 ` Anthony de Almeida Lopes
2021-09-11 8:32 ` Xi Ruoyao
2021-09-13 14:06 ` Anthony de Almeida Lopes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e2f59101-89e1-e7b2-d4ee-c748a9b633a5@falsifiable.net \
--to=anthony.de.almeida.lopes@falsifiable.net \
--cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).