RE: checking out 2.95.3 branch

RE: checking out 2.95.3 branch

[David Korn]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Igor Schein [ mailto:igor@txc.com ]
>Sent: 20 December 2000 16:13

>Hi,
>
>what is the CVS tag to check out 2.95.3 development branch? The web
>site http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html doesn't mention it at all.
>

    Hi Igor,

 The tag you want is "gcc-2_95-branch", so add "-r gcc-2_95-branch" to
your cvs command line. There's no tag that refers to 2.95.3 directly;
gcc-2_95-branch is the current latest working version, and when the 
release is done a tag for gcc-2_95_3-release (or similar) will be made.
After that, gcc-2_95-branch will be considered the development branch for
2.95.4.

     DaveK
-- 
The Boulder Pledge: "Under no circumstances will I ever purchase anything 
offered to me as the result of an unsolicited email message. Nor will I 
forward chain letters, petitions, mass mailings, or virus warnings to large 
numbers of others. This is my contribution to the survival of the online
community." 


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************

Re: checking out 2.95.3 branch

[Igor Schein]

On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 11:24:07AM -0000, David Korn wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Igor Schein [ mailto:igor@txc.com ]
> >Sent: 20 December 2000 16:13
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >what is the CVS tag to check out 2.95.3 development branch? The web
> >site http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html doesn't mention it at all.
> >
> 
>     Hi Igor,
> 
>  The tag you want is "gcc-2_95-branch", so add "-r gcc-2_95-branch" to
> your cvs command line. There's no tag that refers to 2.95.3 directly;
> gcc-2_95-branch is the current latest working version, and when the 
> release is done a tag for gcc-2_95_3-release (or similar) will be made.
> After that, gcc-2_95-branch will be considered the development branch for
> 2.95.4.

Thanks for your help.  I have another similar question.  On Dec 11, 2.95.2.1
release showed up on sourceware ftp site, marked as unretrievable.
I'm curious, when there's a dead silence around this release, and how
is it related to 2.95.3 subbranch.

Thanks 

Igor

Re: checking out 2.95.3 branch

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 20001227111216.G5475@neptune.txc.com >you write:
   > release showed up on sourceware ftp site, marked as unretrievable.
  > I'm curious, when there's a dead silence around this release, and how
  > is it related to 2.95.3 subbranch.
It's a release to fix the problems with glibc-2.2.  No more, no less.  I've
just been basically out of touch too much recently to fix a minor packaging
problem and get the updated tarballs out.

jeff

RE: checking out 2.95.3 branch

[David Korn]

>From: Igor Schein [ mailto:igor@txc.com ]
>Sent: 27 December 2000 16:12

>Thanks for your help. I have another similar question. On Dec 11, 2.95.2.1
>release showed up on sourceware ftp site, marked as unretrievable.
>I'm curious, when there's a dead silence around this release, and how
>is it related to 2.95.3 subbranch.

 According to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-12/msg01187.html ,
it's some experimental version that Jeff Law was working on but seems to
have put to one side through lack of time.

       DaveK
-- 
The Boulder Pledge: "Under no circumstances will I ever purchase anything 
offered to me as the result of an unsolicited email message. Nor will I 
forward chain letters, petitions, mass mailings, or virus warnings to large 
numbers of others. This is my contribution to the survival of the online
community." 


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************

checking out 2.95.3 branch

[Igor Schein]

Hi,

what is the CVS tag to check out 2.95.3 development branch? The web
site http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html doesn't mention it at all.

Thanks

Igor