* libstdc++.so didn't build?
@ 2001-01-19 11:54 Rigel
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Rigel @ 2001-01-19 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
I didn't check the archives, but I think libstdc++.so didn't build because when I run ldd on my c++ executables, they say they're using libstdc++.so.2.8. I believe the newest libstdc++ is 2.10, but I can't seem to find it in the gcc build tree. Can anyone help me with this?
Thanks,
Rigel Freden
Angelfire for your free web-based e-mail. http://www.angelfire.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2001-01-19 11:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-01-19 11:54 libstdc++.so didn't build? Rigel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).