* Re: GCC for SHARC port to PC (numerical C)
[not found] <852but$f42$1@newnews.mikom.csir.co.za>
@ 2000-01-06 18:33 ` Kenneth Porter
2000-01-07 10:41 ` Alan Lehotsky
2000-04-01 0:00 ` Kenneth Porter
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kenneth Porter @ 2000-01-06 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gcc
mj wrote:
>
> Hi
> The gcc port by ADI for the sharc includes numerical extensions to the C
> language (vector, complex arithmetic). I am interested in developing code
> on a PC and port it to the SHARC at a later stage. I would like to compile
> numerical C codes with gcc on a PC without a SHARC. Does anybody have
> experience with this? Must I recompile the compiler for the PC?
> TYIA
> Marthinus
I think Gnu adopted the numeric extensions at one point, but I don't
know if they're in the current generation of the compiler. There *is* a
PC port of gcc. Check out Cygwin ( http://sourceware.cygnus.com/cygwin/ )
for example.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC for SHARC port to PC (numerical C)
2000-01-06 18:33 ` GCC for SHARC port to PC (numerical C) Kenneth Porter
@ 2000-01-07 10:41 ` Alan Lehotsky
2000-04-01 0:00 ` Alan Lehotsky
2000-04-01 0:00 ` Kenneth Porter
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Lehotsky @ 2000-01-07 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gcc
In article < 38754F47.BDF3113D@well.com >, Kenneth Porter
<shiva@well.com> wrote:
>>>mj wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>> The gcc port by ADI for the sharc includes numerical extensions to the
>>>> C
>>>> language (vector, complex arithmetic). I am interested in developing
>>>> code
>>>> on a PC and port it to the SHARC at a later stage. I would like to
>>>> compile
>>>> numerical C codes with gcc on a PC without a SHARC. Does anybody have
>>>> experience with this? Must I recompile the compiler for the PC?
>>>> TYIA
>>>> Marthinus
>>>
>>>I think Gnu adopted the numeric extensions at one point, but I don't
>>>know if they're in the current generation of the compiler. There *is* a
>>>PC port of gcc. Check out Cygwin ( http://sourceware.cygnus.com/cygwin/ )
>>>for example.
I'm pretty sure that:
1/ The ADI extensions never worked correctly. At least not if
you turned on the optimizer.
2/ They have long since been obsoleted in the GCC code
(there was some discussion about some code support for
iterators that wasn't totally dead, but nobody had a clue
about how it was supposed to work.)
-- Al
--
Quality Software Management
http://www.tiac.net/users/lehotsky
Process Improvement | Management Consulting | Compiler Implementation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC for SHARC port to PC (numerical C)
2000-01-07 10:41 ` Alan Lehotsky
@ 2000-04-01 0:00 ` Alan Lehotsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Lehotsky @ 2000-04-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gcc
In article < 38754F47.BDF3113D@well.com >, Kenneth Porter
<shiva@well.com> wrote:
>>>mj wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>> The gcc port by ADI for the sharc includes numerical extensions to the
>>>> C
>>>> language (vector, complex arithmetic). I am interested in developing
>>>> code
>>>> on a PC and port it to the SHARC at a later stage. I would like to
>>>> compile
>>>> numerical C codes with gcc on a PC without a SHARC. Does anybody have
>>>> experience with this? Must I recompile the compiler for the PC?
>>>> TYIA
>>>> Marthinus
>>>
>>>I think Gnu adopted the numeric extensions at one point, but I don't
>>>know if they're in the current generation of the compiler. There *is* a
>>>PC port of gcc. Check out Cygwin ( http://sourceware.cygnus.com/cygwin/ )
>>>for example.
I'm pretty sure that:
1/ The ADI extensions never worked correctly. At least not if
you turned on the optimizer.
2/ They have long since been obsoleted in the GCC code
(there was some discussion about some code support for
iterators that wasn't totally dead, but nobody had a clue
about how it was supposed to work.)
-- Al
--
Quality Software Management
http://www.tiac.net/users/lehotsky
Process Improvement | Management Consulting | Compiler Implementation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC for SHARC port to PC (numerical C)
2000-01-06 18:33 ` GCC for SHARC port to PC (numerical C) Kenneth Porter
2000-01-07 10:41 ` Alan Lehotsky
@ 2000-04-01 0:00 ` Kenneth Porter
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kenneth Porter @ 2000-04-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gcc
mj wrote:
>
> Hi
> The gcc port by ADI for the sharc includes numerical extensions to the C
> language (vector, complex arithmetic). I am interested in developing code
> on a PC and port it to the SHARC at a later stage. I would like to compile
> numerical C codes with gcc on a PC without a SHARC. Does anybody have
> experience with this? Must I recompile the compiler for the PC?
> TYIA
> Marthinus
I think Gnu adopted the numeric extensions at one point, but I don't
know if they're in the current generation of the compiler. There *is* a
PC port of gcc. Check out Cygwin ( http://sourceware.cygnus.com/cygwin/ )
for example.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-04-01 0:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <852but$f42$1@newnews.mikom.csir.co.za>
2000-01-06 18:33 ` GCC for SHARC port to PC (numerical C) Kenneth Porter
2000-01-07 10:41 ` Alan Lehotsky
2000-04-01 0:00 ` Alan Lehotsky
2000-04-01 0:00 ` Kenneth Porter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).