* -O or -g on gcc linker frontend?
@ 2006-06-22 16:57 Gerhard Theurich
2006-06-22 18:38 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gerhard Theurich @ 2006-06-22 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
Hi All,
For a while now I have been wondering if the gcc linker frontend cares knowing
about -g or -O flags. Let's say I have an object file a.o and I want to link it
into an executable a.out using gcc I can just say:
gcc a.o
But I can also use debug or optimization flags:
gcc -g a.o
gcc -O2 a.o
....
Does the gcc linker frontend care about these flags or are they simply ignored?
Is it generally advisable to use some consistent set of -g/-O flags during
linkage compared to what was used during compilation of the objects (what if the
objects where compiled with different options)?
Thanks for any advice!
-Gerhard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: -O or -g on gcc linker frontend?
2006-06-22 16:57 -O or -g on gcc linker frontend? Gerhard Theurich
@ 2006-06-22 18:38 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2006-06-22 19:06 ` Charles L. Farbstein
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Lance Taylor @ 2006-06-22 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gerhard Theurich; +Cc: gcc-help
Gerhard Theurich <gtheurich@sgi.com> writes:
> For a while now I have been wondering if the gcc linker frontend cares
> knowing about -g or -O flags. Let's say I have an object file a.o and
> I want to link it into an executable a.out using gcc I can just say:
> gcc a.o
> But I can also use debug or optimization flags:
> gcc -g a.o
> gcc -O2 a.o
> ....
> Does the gcc linker frontend care about these flags or are they simply
> ignored? Is it generally advisable to use some consistent set of -g/-O
> flags during linkage compared to what was used during compilation of
> the objects (what if the objects where compiled with different
> options)?
The -g and -O options are used only when generating .o files, and are
ignored when linking .o files.
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: -O or -g on gcc linker frontend?
2006-06-22 18:38 ` Ian Lance Taylor
@ 2006-06-22 19:06 ` Charles L. Farbstein
2006-06-22 20:02 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Charles L. Farbstein @ 2006-06-22 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 11:37 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Gerhard Theurich <gtheurich@sgi.com> writes:
>
> > For a while now I have been wondering if the gcc linker frontend cares
> > knowing about -g or -O flags. Let's say I have an object file a.o and
> > I want to link it into an executable a.out using gcc I can just say:
> > gcc a.o
> > But I can also use debug or optimization flags:
> > gcc -g a.o
> > gcc -O2 a.o
> > ....
> > Does the gcc linker frontend care about these flags or are they simply
> > ignored? Is it generally advisable to use some consistent set of -g/-O
> > flags during linkage compared to what was used during compilation of
> > the objects (what if the objects where compiled with different
> > options)?
>
> The -g and -O options are used only when generating .o files, and are
> ignored when linking .o files.
>
> Ian
Isn't the -g option used by the linker to put the debug information into
the executable image or in the shared object library?
--
Charlie Farbstein
L-3 Communications/ Titan Group
e-mail: charles.farbstein@L-3Com.com
phone: (619) 278-2053
fax: (619) 278-2070
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: -O or -g on gcc linker frontend?
2006-06-22 19:06 ` Charles L. Farbstein
@ 2006-06-22 20:02 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Lance Taylor @ 2006-06-22 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Charles L. Farbstein; +Cc: gcc-help
"Charles L. Farbstein" <charles.farbstein@L-3Com.com> writes:
> On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 11:37 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > The -g and -O options are used only when generating .o files, and are
> > ignored when linking .o files.
> Isn't the -g option used by the linker to put the debug information into
> the executable image or in the shared object library?
No.
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-06-22 20:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-06-22 16:57 -O or -g on gcc linker frontend? Gerhard Theurich
2006-06-22 18:38 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2006-06-22 19:06 ` Charles L. Farbstein
2006-06-22 20:02 ` Ian Lance Taylor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).