public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Roger Sayle" <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
To: "'GCC Patches'" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: "'Uros Bizjak'" <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Subject: [x86_64 PATCH] Introduce insvti_highpart define_insn_and_split.
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 14:10:04 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <001501d9210f$694bed70$3be3c850$@nextmovesoftware.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1919 bytes --]


This patch adds a convenient post-reload splitter for setting/updating
the highpart of a TImode variable, using the recently added
split_double_concat infrastructure.

For the new test case below:

__int128 foo(__int128 x, unsigned long long y)
{
  __int128 t = (__int128)y << 64;
  __int128 r = (x & ~0ull) | t;
  return r;
}

mainline GCC with -O2 currently generates:

foo:    movq    %rdi, %rcx
        xorl    %eax, %eax
        xorl    %edi, %edi
        orq     %rcx, %rax
        orq     %rdi, %rdx
        ret

with this patch, GCC instead now generates the much better:

foo:    movq    %rdi, %rcx
        movq    %rcx, %rax
        ret

[which interestingly shows the deeper (ABI) issue that I'm trying
to fix, this new define_insn_and_split being the next piece].

It turns out that the -m32 equivalent of this testcase, already
avoids using explict orl/xor instructions, as it gets optimized
(in combine) by a completely different path.  Given that this idiom
isn't seen in 32-bit code (and therefore this pattern wouldn't match),
and also that the shorter 32-bit AND bitmask is represented as a
CONST_INT rather than a CONST_WIDE_INT, this new define_insn_and_split
is implemented for just TARGET_64BIT rather than contort a "generic"
implementation using DWI mode iterators.

This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap
and make -k check, both with and without --target_board=unix{-m32},
with no new failures.  Ok for mainline?  Please let me know if you'd
prefer a different pattern name [insv seemed better than mov].


2023-01-05  Roger Sayle  <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>

gcc/ChangeLog
	* config/i386/i386.md (any_or_plus): Move definition earlier.
	(*insvti_highpart_1): New define_insn_and_split to overwrite
	(insv) the highpart of a TImode register/memory.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
	* gcc.target/i386/insvti_highpart-1.c: New test case.


Thanks in advance,
Roger
--


[-- Attachment #2: patchin.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2074 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
index 890c4c8..9f3c62b 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
@@ -3401,6 +3401,31 @@
   "mov{b}\t{%h1, %h0|%h0, %h1}"
   [(set_attr "type" "imov")
    (set_attr "mode" "QI")])
+
+(define_code_iterator any_or_plus [plus ior xor])
+(define_insn_and_split "*insvti_highpart_1"
+  [(set (match_operand:TI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=ro,r,r,&r")
+	(any_or_plus:TI
+	  (and:TI
+	    (match_operand:TI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "r,m,r,m")
+	    (match_operand:TI 3 "const_scalar_int_operand" "n,n,n,n"))
+	  (ashift:TI
+	    (zero_extend:TI
+	      (match_operand:DI 2 "nonimmediate_operand" "r,r,m,m"))
+	    (const_int 64))))]
+  "TARGET_64BIT
+   && CONST_WIDE_INT_P (operands[3])
+   && CONST_WIDE_INT_NUNITS (operands[3]) == 2
+   && CONST_WIDE_INT_ELT (operands[3], 0) == -1
+   && CONST_WIDE_INT_ELT (operands[3], 1) == 0"
+  "#"
+  "&& reload_completed"
+  [(clobber (const_int 0))]
+{
+  operands[4] = gen_lowpart (DImode, operands[1]);
+  split_double_concat (TImode, operands[0], operands[4], operands[2]);
+  DONE;
+})
 \f
 ;; Floating point push instructions.
 
@@ -11418,7 +11443,6 @@
    (set_attr "mode" "QI")])
 
 ;; Split DST = (HI<<32)|LO early to minimize register usage.
-(define_code_iterator any_or_plus [plus ior xor])
 (define_insn_and_split "*concat<mode><dwi>3_1"
   [(set (match_operand:<DWI> 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=ro,r")
 	(any_or_plus:<DWI>
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/insvti_highpart-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/insvti_highpart-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4ae9ccf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/insvti_highpart-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+__int128 foo(__int128 x, unsigned long long y)
+{
+  __int128 t = (__int128)y << 64;
+  __int128 r = (x & ~0ull) | t;
+  return r;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "xorl" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "orq" } } */

             reply	other threads:[~2023-01-05 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-05 14:10 Roger Sayle [this message]
2023-01-05 20:26 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-05-06 14:00 Roger Sayle
2023-05-07 15:20 ` Uros Bizjak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='001501d9210f$694bed70$3be3c850$@nextmovesoftware.com' \
    --to=roger@nextmovesoftware.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).