From: "Roger Sayle" <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
To: <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [x86_64 PATCH] PR target/106450: Tweak timode_remove_non_convertible_regs.
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 17:43:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <008b01d8a2a1$2ab6ff60$8024fe20$@nextmovesoftware.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1696 bytes --]
This patch resolves PR target/106450, some more fall-out from more
aggressive TImode scalar-to-vector (STV) optimizations. I continue
to be caught out by how far TImode STV has diverged from DImode/SImode
STV, and therefore requires additional (unexpected) tweaking. Many
thanks to H.J. Lu for pointing out timode_remove_non_convertible_regs
needs to be extended to handle XOR (and other new operations).
Unhelpfully the comment above this function states that it's the TImode
version of "remove_non_convertible_regs", which doesn't exist anymore,
so I've resurrected an explanatory comment from the git history.
By refactoring the checks for hard regs and already "marked" regs
into timode_check_non_convertible_regs itself, all its callers are
simplified. This patch then uses GET_RTX_CLASS to generically handle
unary and binary operations, calling timode_check_non_convertible_regs
on each TImode register operand in the single_set's SET_SRC.
This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap
and make -k check, both with and without --target_board=unix{-m32},
with no new failures. Ok for mainline?
2022-07-28 Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
gcc/ChangeLog
PR target/106450
* config/i386/i386-features.cc (timode_check_non_convertible_regs):
Do nothing if REGNO is set in the REGS bitmap, or is a hard reg.
(timode_remove_non_convertible_regs): Update comment.
Call timode_check_non_convertible_regs on all register operands
of supported (binary and unary) operations.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
PR target/106450
* gcc.target/i386/pr106450.c: New test case.
Thanks in advance,
Roger
--
[-- Attachment #2: patchst.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3138 bytes --]
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc
index aa5de71..2a4097c 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc
@@ -1808,6 +1808,11 @@ static void
timode_check_non_convertible_regs (bitmap candidates, bitmap regs,
unsigned int regno)
{
+ /* Do nothing if REGNO is already in REGS or is a hard reg. */
+ if (bitmap_bit_p (regs, regno)
+ || HARD_REGISTER_NUM_P (regno))
+ return;
+
for (df_ref def = DF_REG_DEF_CHAIN (regno);
def;
def = DF_REF_NEXT_REG (def))
@@ -1843,7 +1848,13 @@ timode_check_non_convertible_regs (bitmap candidates, bitmap regs,
}
}
-/* The TImode version of remove_non_convertible_regs. */
+/* For a given bitmap of insn UIDs scans all instructions and
+ remove insn from CANDIDATES in case it has both convertible
+ and not convertible definitions.
+
+ All insns in a bitmap are conversion candidates according to
+ scalar_to_vector_candidate_p. Currently it implies all insns
+ are single_set. */
static void
timode_remove_non_convertible_regs (bitmap candidates)
@@ -1861,21 +1872,40 @@ timode_remove_non_convertible_regs (bitmap candidates)
rtx dest = SET_DEST (def_set);
rtx src = SET_SRC (def_set);
- if ((!REG_P (dest)
- || bitmap_bit_p (regs, REGNO (dest))
- || HARD_REGISTER_P (dest))
- && (!REG_P (src)
- || bitmap_bit_p (regs, REGNO (src))
- || HARD_REGISTER_P (src)))
- continue;
-
if (REG_P (dest))
timode_check_non_convertible_regs (candidates, regs,
REGNO (dest));
- if (REG_P (src))
- timode_check_non_convertible_regs (candidates, regs,
- REGNO (src));
+ switch (GET_RTX_CLASS (GET_CODE (src)))
+ {
+ case RTX_OBJ:
+ if (REG_P (src))
+ timode_check_non_convertible_regs (candidates, regs,
+ REGNO (src));
+ break;
+
+ case RTX_UNARY:
+ if (REG_P (XEXP (src, 0))
+ && GET_MODE (XEXP (src, 0)) == TImode)
+ timode_check_non_convertible_regs (candidates, regs,
+ REGNO (XEXP (src, 0)));
+ break;
+
+ case RTX_COMM_ARITH:
+ case RTX_BIN_ARITH:
+ if (REG_P (XEXP (src, 0))
+ && GET_MODE (XEXP (src, 0)) == TImode)
+ timode_check_non_convertible_regs (candidates, regs,
+ REGNO (XEXP (src, 0)));
+ if (REG_P (XEXP (src, 1))
+ && GET_MODE (XEXP (src, 1)) == TImode)
+ timode_check_non_convertible_regs (candidates, regs,
+ REGNO (XEXP (src, 1)));
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
}
EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP (regs, 0, id, bi)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106450.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106450.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d16231f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106450.c
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fsplit-paths" } */
+
+__int128 n;
+
+__attribute__ ((simd)) void
+foo (void)
+{
+ __int128 uninitialized;
+ unsigned __int128 *p = &n;
+
+ n >>= *p ? : 2;
+ n |= uninitialized;
+}
next reply other threads:[~2022-07-28 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-28 16:43 Roger Sayle [this message]
2022-07-28 16:55 ` H.J. Lu
2022-07-30 9:42 ` [x86_64 PATCH take #2] " Roger Sayle
2022-07-31 17:23 ` Uros Bizjak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='008b01d8a2a1$2ab6ff60$8024fe20$@nextmovesoftware.com' \
--to=roger@nextmovesoftware.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).