From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, jlaw@ventanamicro.com
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vineetg@rivosinc.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>,
philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable shrink wrapping for the RISC-V target.
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 11:15:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08273c28-07ff-3170-679b-225d60a9ee2d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mhng-1ef6a2eb-a41e-4eb7-931a-04efc949db61@palmer-ri-x1c9a>
On 10/18/22 11:35, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>
>> I would have expected things to work fine with libcalls, perhaps with
>> the exception of the save/restore libcalls. So that needs deeper
>> investigation.
>
> The save/restore libcalls only support saving/restoring a handful of
> register configurations (just the saved X registers in the order
> they're usually saved in by GCC). It should be OK for correctness to
> over-save registers, but it kind of just un-does the shrink wrapping
> so not sure it's worth worrying about at that point.
>
> There's also some oddness around the save/restore libcall ABI, it's
> not the standard function ABI but instead a GCC-internal one. IIRC it
> just uses the alternate link register (ie, t0 instead of ra) but I may
> have forgotten something else.
I hadn't really dug into it -- I was pretty sure they weren't following
the standard ABI based on its name and how I've used similar routines to
save space on some targets in the past. So if we're having problems
with shrink-wrapping and libcalls, those two might be worth investigating.
But I think the most important takeaway is that shrink wrapping should
work with libcalls, there's nothing radically different about libcalls
that would make them inherently interact poorly with shrink-wrapping.
So that aspect of the shrink-wrapping patch needs deeper investigation.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-19 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-06 10:39 mtsamis
2022-10-02 20:32 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-10-18 15:18 ` Manolis Tsamis
2022-10-18 15:57 ` Jeff Law
2022-10-18 17:35 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-10-19 17:15 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2022-10-20 7:42 ` Manolis Tsamis
2022-11-02 14:12 ` Manolis Tsamis
2022-11-02 15:02 ` Jeff Law
2022-10-20 7:35 ` Manolis Tsamis
2022-11-02 13:54 ` Manolis Tsamis
2022-11-02 15:06 ` Jeff Law
2022-11-03 0:26 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-11-03 22:23 ` Jeff Law
2022-11-07 22:07 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-11-13 1:32 ` Jeff Law
2022-11-16 10:26 ` Manolis Tsamis
2022-11-17 2:09 ` Jeff Law
2022-11-17 10:54 ` Manolis Tsamis
2022-11-17 11:59 ` Philipp Tomsich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=08273c28-07ff-3170-679b-225d60a9ee2d@gmail.com \
--to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jlaw@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu \
--cc=vineetg@rivosinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).