public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Stubbs <ams@codesourcery.com>
To: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>,
	<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [og12] libgomp: Document OpenMP 'pinned' memory (was: [PATCH] libgomp, openmp: pinned memory)
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 13:01:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a37516b-7584-1c45-8f6f-17a121bbcfc2@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878rfiqvtn.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net>

On 27/03/2023 12:26, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On 2023-03-27T09:27:31+0000, "Stubbs, Andrew" <andrew.stubbs@siemens.com> wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
>>> Sent: 24 March 2023 15:50
>>>
>>> On 2022-01-04T15:32:17+0000, Andrew Stubbs <ams@codesourcery.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> This patch implements the OpenMP pinned memory trait [...]
>>>
>>> I figure it may be helpful to document the current og12 state of affairs; does
>>> the attached "libgomp: Document OpenMP 'pinned' memory" look good to
>>> you?
>>
>> I don't really know what "allocated via the device" means?
> 
> Heh, you're right.
> 
>> I mean, I presume you mean "via CUDA", but I don't think this is obvious to the average reader.
>> Maybe "allocation is optimized for the device" or some such thing?
> 
> As we're in sections that are documenting GCN vs. nvptx specifics, we
> might indeed call out which exact interfaces we're using.
> 
> How's the updated "libgomp: Document OpenMP 'pinned' memory", see
> attached?

LGTM, FWIW.

Andrew

      reply	other threads:[~2023-03-27 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-04 15:32 [PATCH] libgomp, openmp: pinned memory Andrew Stubbs
2022-01-04 15:55 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-01-04 16:58   ` Andrew Stubbs
2022-01-04 18:28     ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-01-04 18:47       ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-01-05 17:07         ` Andrew Stubbs
2022-01-13 13:53           ` Andrew Stubbs
2022-06-07 11:05             ` Andrew Stubbs
2022-06-07 12:10               ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-06-07 12:28                 ` Andrew Stubbs
2022-06-07 12:40                   ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-06-09  9:38                   ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-06-09 10:09                     ` Tobias Burnus
2022-06-09 10:22                       ` Stubbs, Andrew
2022-06-09 10:31                     ` Stubbs, Andrew
2023-02-16 15:32                     ` Attempt to register OpenMP pinned memory using a device instead of 'mlock' (was: [PATCH] libgomp, openmp: pinned memory) Thomas Schwinge
2023-02-16 16:17                       ` Stubbs, Andrew
2023-02-16 22:06                         ` [og12] " Thomas Schwinge
2023-02-17  8:12                           ` Thomas Schwinge
2023-02-20  9:48                             ` Andrew Stubbs
2023-02-20 13:53                               ` [og12] Attempt to not just register but allocate OpenMP pinned memory using a device (was: [og12] Attempt to register OpenMP pinned memory using a device instead of 'mlock') Thomas Schwinge
2023-02-10 15:11             ` [PATCH] libgomp, openmp: pinned memory Thomas Schwinge
2023-02-10 15:55               ` Andrew Stubbs
2023-02-16 21:39             ` [og12] Clarify/verify OpenMP 'omp_calloc' zero-initialization for pinned memory (was: [PATCH] libgomp, openmp: pinned memory) Thomas Schwinge
2023-03-24 15:49 ` [og12] libgomp: Document OpenMP 'pinned' memory (was: [PATCH] libgomp, openmp: pinned memory Thomas Schwinge
2023-03-27  9:27   ` Stubbs, Andrew
2023-03-27 11:26     ` [og12] libgomp: Document OpenMP 'pinned' memory (was: [PATCH] libgomp, openmp: pinned memory) Thomas Schwinge
2023-03-27 12:01       ` Andrew Stubbs [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1a37516b-7584-1c45-8f6f-17a121bbcfc2@codesourcery.com \
    --to=ams@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=thomas@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=tobias@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).