public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
To: chenglulu <chenglulu@loongson.cn>,
	Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
	i@xen0n.name,  xuchenghua@loongson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] LoongArch: Fix usage of LSX and LASX frint/ftint instructions [PR112578]
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 18:30:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1dce723786e28a25ec7c44a323c79b26e5eb5b03.camel@xry111.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97012389-18f1-97ee-24b3-778c5728aa54@loongson.cn>

On Fri, 2023-11-24 at 17:46 +0800, chenglulu wrote:
> It's just that I'm confused that the description of rint in n2310, 
> including Joseph's email,

> all say that rint will not set errno, but linux-man says "which might 
> set errno to ERANGE" .

Annex F has:

The C floating types match the IEC 60559 formats as follows:
- The float type matches the IEC 60559 single format.
- The double type matches the IEC 60559 double format.

With these constraints rint and rintf just cannot have a range or domain
error.  So Annex F does not say rint may set errno.  Linux-man says:

ERRORS
       No errors occur.  POSIX.1‐2001 documents a range error  for  overflows,
       but see NOTES.

It's because POSIX does not mandates float/double to match the IEC 60559
formats, thus a range error may happen with some strange floating point
formats.  The NOTES says "this won't happen for IEC 60559 formats".

For lrint, N2310 says:

If the rounded value is outside the range of the return type, the
numeric result is unspecified and a domain error or range error may
occur.

So a EDOM or ERANGE may be set.  On the contrary, the man page says:

       The following errors can occur:

       Domain error: x is a NaN or infinite, or the rounded value is too large
              An invalid floating‐point exception (FE_INVALID) is raised.

       These functions do not set errno.

The last paragraph is Glibc-specific, and it's considered a Glibc bug
(https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6798).

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-24 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-20  0:47 [PATCH v3 0/5] LoongArch: SIMD fixes and optimizations Xi Ruoyao
2023-11-20  0:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] LoongArch: Fix usage of LSX and LASX frint/ftint instructions [PR112578] Xi Ruoyao
2023-11-23  6:35   ` chenglulu
2023-11-23  7:11     ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-11-23  7:31       ` chenglulu
2023-11-23  8:13         ` chenglulu
2023-11-23  9:02           ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-11-23  9:12             ` chenglulu
2023-11-23 10:12               ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-11-23 12:06                 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-11-23 18:03                 ` Joseph Myers
2023-11-24  2:39                   ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-11-24  8:01                     ` chenglulu
2023-11-24  8:26                       ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-11-24  8:36                         ` chenglulu
2023-11-24  8:42                           ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-11-24  9:46                             ` chenglulu
2023-11-24 10:30                               ` Xi Ruoyao [this message]
2023-11-24 14:59                                 ` chenglulu
2023-11-23  8:54         ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-11-20  0:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] LoongArch: Use standard pattern name and RTX code for LSX/LASX muh instructions Xi Ruoyao
2023-11-23 12:08   ` chenglulu
2023-11-20  0:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] LoongArch: Use standard pattern name and RTX code for LSX/LASX rotate shift Xi Ruoyao
2023-11-23  8:42   ` chenglulu
2023-11-20  0:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] LoongArch: Remove lrint_allow_inexact Xi Ruoyao
2023-11-23  8:23   ` chenglulu
2023-11-23  8:58     ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-11-23  9:14       ` chenglulu
2023-11-23 12:24         ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-11-23 14:39           ` chenglulu
2023-11-20  0:47 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] LoongArch: Use LSX for scalar FP rounding with explicit rounding mode Xi Ruoyao
2023-11-29  7:12 ` Pushed: [PATCH v3 0/5] LoongArch: SIMD fixes and optimizations Xi Ruoyao
2023-11-29  7:45   ` chenglulu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1dce723786e28a25ec7c44a323c79b26e5eb5b03.camel@xry111.site \
    --to=xry111@xry111.site \
    --cc=chenglulu@loongson.cn \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=i@xen0n.name \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=xuchenghua@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).