[committed] arm: fix checking ICE in arm_print_operand [PR106004]

[committed] arm: fix checking ICE in arm_print_operand [PR106004]

[Richard Earnshaw]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 636 bytes --]


Sigh, another instance where I incorrectly used XUINT instead of
UINTVAL.

I've also made the code here a little more robust (although I think
this case can't in fact be reached) if the 32-bit clear mask includes
bit 31.  This case, if reached, would print out an out-of-range value
based on the size of the compiler's HOST_WIDE_INT type due to
sign-extension.  We avoid this by masking the value after inversion.

gcc/ChangeLog:
	PR target/106004
	* config/arm/arm.cc (arm_print_operand, case 'V'): Use UINTVAL.
	Clear bits in the mask above bit 31.
---
 gcc/config/arm/arm.cc | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-arm-fix-checking-ICE-in-arm_print_operand-PR106004.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch; name="0001-arm-fix-checking-ICE-in-arm_print_operand-PR106004.patch", Size: 503 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc b/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc
index 2925907b436..33fb98d5cad 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc
@@ -24199,7 +24199,8 @@ arm_print_operand (FILE *stream, rtx x, int code)
 	    return;
 	  }
 
-	unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT val = ~XUINT (x, 0);
+	unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT val
+	  = ~UINTVAL (x) & HOST_WIDE_INT_UC (0xffffffff);
 	int lsb = exact_log2 (val & -val);
 	asm_fprintf (stream, "#%d, #%d", lsb,
 		     (exact_log2 (val + (val & -val)) - lsb));