From: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org>,
Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce -nolibstdc++ option
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 01:19:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220621081911.fvwzqbmprnglnt4y@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc1s4kUXQi3XNgx58G6yT9D=OEOOuuyFiBFDRJgp83N+Mw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2022-06-21, Richard Biener wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 9:53 AM Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 1:43 AM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
>> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:56 AM Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
>> > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Using g++ to link without libstdc++, as in g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C,
>> > > is error prone, because there's no way to tell g++ to drop libstdc++
>> > > without also dropping libc and any other libraries that the target
>> > > implicitly links in.
>> > >
>> > > This has often led to the need for manual adjustments to this
>> > > testcase.
>> > >
>> > > I figured adding support for -nolibstdc++, even though redundant,
>> > > makes some sense. One could presumably use gcc rather than g++ for
>> > > linking, for the same effect, but sometimes changing the link command
>> > > is harder than adding an option, as in our testsuite.
>> > >
>> > > Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with a cross to
>> > > aarch64-rtems6. Ok to install?
>> >
>> > OK in case nobody objects in 24h.
>> >
>> > Richard.
>>
>> Is this similar to clang -nostdlib++ ?
>> When libstdc++ is selected, clang -nostdlib++ removes -lstdc++.
>
>Probably. Note that we have -static-libstdc++ already so
>-nolibstdc++ matches that. We also have -nolibc, not -noclib.
>
>Richard.
I think the relation between -static-foo and -nofoo is not that large.
-nostdlib does not have a corresponding -static-stdlib.
Note that gcc has supported -stdlib=libc++ since 2020-12, though the
usage is a bit tricky. Having a C++ standard library agnostic name
helps libc++:)
For -lc, clang has -nolibc.
>> > >
>> > > for gcc/ChangeLog
>> > >
>> > > * common.opt (nolibstdc++): New.
>> > > * doc/invoke.texi (-nolibstdc++): Document it.
>> > >
>> > > for gcc/cp/ChangeLog
>> > >
>> > > * g++spec.c (lang_specific_driver): Implement -nolibstdc++.
>> > >
>> > > for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>> > >
>> > > * g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C: Use -nolibstdc++.
>> > > ---
>> > > gcc/common.opt | 3 +++
>> > > gcc/cp/g++spec.cc | 1 +
>> > > gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 6 +++++-
>> > > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C | 2 +-
>> > > 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/gcc/common.opt b/gcc/common.opt
>> > > index 32917aafcaec1..e00c6fc2fb098 100644
>> > > --- a/gcc/common.opt
>> > > +++ b/gcc/common.opt
>> > > @@ -3456,6 +3456,9 @@ Driver
>> > > nolibc
>> > > Driver
>> > >
>> > > +nolibstdc++
>> > > +Driver
>> > > +
>> > > nostdlib
>> > > Driver
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/g++spec.cc b/gcc/cp/g++spec.cc
>> > > index 8174d652776b1..539e6ca089d85 100644
>> > > --- a/gcc/cp/g++spec.cc
>> > > +++ b/gcc/cp/g++spec.cc
>> > > @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ lang_specific_driver (struct cl_decoded_option **in_decoded_options,
>> > > {
>> > > case OPT_nostdlib:
>> > > case OPT_nodefaultlibs:
>> > > + case OPT_nolibstdc__:
>> > > library = -1;
>> > > break;
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
>> > > index 50f57877477bc..469b6d97e0dfa 100644
>> > > --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
>> > > +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
>> > > @@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ Objective-C and Objective-C++ Dialects}.
>> > > @item Linker Options
>> > > @xref{Link Options,,Options for Linking}.
>> > > @gccoptlist{@var{object-file-name} -fuse-ld=@var{linker} -l@var{library} @gol
>> > > --nostartfiles -nodefaultlibs -nolibc -nostdlib @gol
>> > > +-nostartfiles -nodefaultlibs -nolibc -nolibstdc++ -nostdlib @gol
>> > > -e @var{entry} --entry=@var{entry} @gol
>> > > -pie -pthread -r -rdynamic @gol
>> > > -s -static -static-pie -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ @gol
>> > > @@ -16787,6 +16787,10 @@ absence of a C library is assumed, for example @option{-lpthread} or
>> > > @option{-lm} in some configurations. This is intended for bare-board
>> > > targets when there is indeed no C library available.
>> > >
>> > > +@item -nolibstdc++
>> > > +@opindex nolibstdc++
>> > > +Do not link with standard C++ libraries implicitly.
>> > > +
>> > > @item -nostdlib
>> > > @opindex nostdlib
>> > > Do not use the standard system startup files or libraries when linking.
>> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C
>> > > index 538e2cb097a0d..889c33e4952f4 100644
>> > > --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C
>> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C
>> > > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>> > > // Test that we don't need libsupc++ just for __cxa_pure_virtual.
>> > > // { dg-do link }
>> > > // { dg-require-weak }
>> > > -// { dg-additional-options "-fno-rtti -nodefaultlibs -lc" }
>> > > +// { dg-additional-options "-fno-rtti -nolibstdc++" }
>> > > // { dg-additional-options "-Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup" { target *-*-darwin* } }
>> > > // { dg-xfail-if "AIX weak" { powerpc-ibm-aix* } }
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
>> > > Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
>> > > Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice
>> > > but very few check the facts. Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-21 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-21 5:55 Alexandre Oliva
2022-06-21 7:37 ` Richard Biener
2022-06-21 7:53 ` Fangrui Song
2022-06-21 8:03 ` Richard Biener
2022-06-21 8:19 ` Fangrui Song [this message]
2022-06-22 0:36 ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-06-22 18:39 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-06-22 23:28 ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-06-22 23:42 ` Fangrui Song
2022-06-23 11:27 ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-06-24 5:23 ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-09-16 11:52 ` Jason Merrill
2022-09-16 11:53 ` Jason Merrill
2022-11-28 17:56 ` Jason Merrill
2023-02-11 9:09 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2023-03-30 11:23 ` Alexandre Oliva
2023-03-30 13:38 ` Arsen Arsenović
2023-03-30 23:13 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2023-04-06 1:25 ` Alexandre Oliva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220621081911.fvwzqbmprnglnt4y@google.com \
--to=maskray@google.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=nathan@acm.org \
--cc=oliva@adacore.com \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).