From: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: jason@redhat.com, Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] c++: Micro-optimize most_specialized_partial_spec
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 17:15:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220831211521.401160-1-ppalka@redhat.com> (raw)
This introduces an early exit test to most_specialized_partial_spec for
the common case where we have no partial specializations, which allows
us to avoid some unnecessary work. In passing, clean the function up a
bit.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk?
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* pt.cc (most_specialized_partial_spec): Exit early when
DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATIONS is empty. Move local variable
declarations closer to their first use. Remove redundant
flag_concepts test. Remove redundant forward declaration.
---
gcc/cp/pt.cc | 45 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index fe7e809fc2d..497a18ef728 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -187,7 +187,6 @@ static int unify_pack_expansion (tree, tree, tree,
static tree copy_template_args (tree);
static tree tsubst_template_parms (tree, tree, tsubst_flags_t);
static void tsubst_each_template_parm_constraints (tree, tree, tsubst_flags_t);
-tree most_specialized_partial_spec (tree, tsubst_flags_t);
static tree tsubst_aggr_type (tree, tree, tsubst_flags_t, tree, int);
static tree tsubst_arg_types (tree, tree, tree, tsubst_flags_t, tree);
static tree tsubst_function_type (tree, tree, tsubst_flags_t, tree);
@@ -25756,15 +25755,7 @@ most_general_template (tree decl)
tree
most_specialized_partial_spec (tree target, tsubst_flags_t complain)
{
- tree list = NULL_TREE;
- tree t;
- tree champ;
- int fate;
- bool ambiguous_p;
- tree outer_args = NULL_TREE;
- tree tmpl, args;
-
- tree decl;
+ tree tmpl, args, decl;
if (TYPE_P (target))
{
tree tinfo = CLASSTYPE_TEMPLATE_INFO (target);
@@ -25788,13 +25779,18 @@ most_specialized_partial_spec (tree target, tsubst_flags_t complain)
else
gcc_unreachable ();
+ tree main_tmpl = most_general_template (tmpl);
+ tree specs = DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATIONS (main_tmpl);
+ if (!specs)
+ /* There are no partial specializations of this template. */
+ return NULL_TREE;
+
push_access_scope_guard pas (decl);
deferring_access_check_sentinel acs (dk_no_deferred);
- tree main_tmpl = most_general_template (tmpl);
-
/* For determining which partial specialization to use, only the
innermost args are interesting. */
+ tree outer_args = NULL_TREE;
if (TMPL_ARGS_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LEVELS (args))
{
outer_args = strip_innermost_template_args (args, 1);
@@ -25806,7 +25802,8 @@ most_specialized_partial_spec (tree target, tsubst_flags_t complain)
fully resolve everything. */
processing_template_decl_sentinel ptds;
- for (t = DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATIONS (main_tmpl); t; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
+ tree list = NULL_TREE;
+ for (tree t = specs; t; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
{
const tree ospec_tmpl = TREE_VALUE (t);
@@ -25829,10 +25826,8 @@ most_specialized_partial_spec (tree target, tsubst_flags_t complain)
if (outer_args)
spec_args = add_to_template_args (outer_args, spec_args);
- /* Keep the candidate only if the constraints are satisfied,
- or if we're not compiling with concepts. */
- if (!flag_concepts
- || constraints_satisfied_p (ospec_tmpl, spec_args))
+ /* Keep the candidate only if the constraints are satisfied. */
+ if (constraints_satisfied_p (ospec_tmpl, spec_args))
{
list = tree_cons (spec_args, ospec_tmpl, list);
TREE_TYPE (list) = TREE_TYPE (t);
@@ -25843,13 +25838,11 @@ most_specialized_partial_spec (tree target, tsubst_flags_t complain)
if (! list)
return NULL_TREE;
- ambiguous_p = false;
- t = list;
- champ = t;
- t = TREE_CHAIN (t);
- for (; t; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
+ tree champ = list;
+ bool ambiguous_p = false;
+ for (tree t = TREE_CHAIN (list); t; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
{
- fate = more_specialized_partial_spec (tmpl, champ, t);
+ int fate = more_specialized_partial_spec (tmpl, champ, t);
if (fate == 1)
;
else
@@ -25868,9 +25861,9 @@ most_specialized_partial_spec (tree target, tsubst_flags_t complain)
}
if (!ambiguous_p)
- for (t = list; t && t != champ; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
+ for (tree t = list; t && t != champ; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
{
- fate = more_specialized_partial_spec (tmpl, champ, t);
+ int fate = more_specialized_partial_spec (tmpl, champ, t);
if (fate != 1)
{
ambiguous_p = true;
@@ -25889,7 +25882,7 @@ most_specialized_partial_spec (tree target, tsubst_flags_t complain)
else
error ("ambiguous template instantiation for %q#D", target);
str = ngettext ("candidate is:", "candidates are:", list_length (list));
- for (t = list; t; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
+ for (tree t = list; t; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
{
tree subst = build_tree_list (TREE_VALUE (t), TREE_PURPOSE (t));
inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (TREE_VALUE (t)),
--
2.37.2.490.g6c8e4ee870
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] c++: Micro-optimize most_specialized_partial_spec
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 17:15:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220831211521.401160-1-ppalka@redhat.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20220831211521.ryCSENKu4fgq9QPfT3vET5ZWqZW-VjwE51nl7_ic3k4@z> (raw)
This introduces an early exit test to most_specialized_partial_spec for
the common case where we have no partial specializations, which allows
us to avoid some unnecessary work. In passing, clean the function up a
bit.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk?
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* pt.cc (most_specialized_partial_spec): Exit early when
DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATIONS is empty. Move local variable
declarations closer to their first use. Remove redundant
flag_concepts test. Remove redundant forward declaration.
---
gcc/cp/pt.cc | 45 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index fe7e809fc2d..497a18ef728 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -187,7 +187,6 @@ static int unify_pack_expansion (tree, tree, tree,
static tree copy_template_args (tree);
static tree tsubst_template_parms (tree, tree, tsubst_flags_t);
static void tsubst_each_template_parm_constraints (tree, tree, tsubst_flags_t);
-tree most_specialized_partial_spec (tree, tsubst_flags_t);
static tree tsubst_aggr_type (tree, tree, tsubst_flags_t, tree, int);
static tree tsubst_arg_types (tree, tree, tree, tsubst_flags_t, tree);
static tree tsubst_function_type (tree, tree, tsubst_flags_t, tree);
@@ -25756,15 +25755,7 @@ most_general_template (tree decl)
tree
most_specialized_partial_spec (tree target, tsubst_flags_t complain)
{
- tree list = NULL_TREE;
- tree t;
- tree champ;
- int fate;
- bool ambiguous_p;
- tree outer_args = NULL_TREE;
- tree tmpl, args;
-
- tree decl;
+ tree tmpl, args, decl;
if (TYPE_P (target))
{
tree tinfo = CLASSTYPE_TEMPLATE_INFO (target);
@@ -25788,13 +25779,18 @@ most_specialized_partial_spec (tree target, tsubst_flags_t complain)
else
gcc_unreachable ();
+ tree main_tmpl = most_general_template (tmpl);
+ tree specs = DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATIONS (main_tmpl);
+ if (!specs)
+ /* There are no partial specializations of this template. */
+ return NULL_TREE;
+
push_access_scope_guard pas (decl);
deferring_access_check_sentinel acs (dk_no_deferred);
- tree main_tmpl = most_general_template (tmpl);
-
/* For determining which partial specialization to use, only the
innermost args are interesting. */
+ tree outer_args = NULL_TREE;
if (TMPL_ARGS_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LEVELS (args))
{
outer_args = strip_innermost_template_args (args, 1);
@@ -25806,7 +25802,8 @@ most_specialized_partial_spec (tree target, tsubst_flags_t complain)
fully resolve everything. */
processing_template_decl_sentinel ptds;
- for (t = DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATIONS (main_tmpl); t; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
+ tree list = NULL_TREE;
+ for (tree t = specs; t; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
{
const tree ospec_tmpl = TREE_VALUE (t);
@@ -25829,10 +25826,8 @@ most_specialized_partial_spec (tree target, tsubst_flags_t complain)
if (outer_args)
spec_args = add_to_template_args (outer_args, spec_args);
- /* Keep the candidate only if the constraints are satisfied,
- or if we're not compiling with concepts. */
- if (!flag_concepts
- || constraints_satisfied_p (ospec_tmpl, spec_args))
+ /* Keep the candidate only if the constraints are satisfied. */
+ if (constraints_satisfied_p (ospec_tmpl, spec_args))
{
list = tree_cons (spec_args, ospec_tmpl, list);
TREE_TYPE (list) = TREE_TYPE (t);
@@ -25843,13 +25838,11 @@ most_specialized_partial_spec (tree target, tsubst_flags_t complain)
if (! list)
return NULL_TREE;
- ambiguous_p = false;
- t = list;
- champ = t;
- t = TREE_CHAIN (t);
- for (; t; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
+ tree champ = list;
+ bool ambiguous_p = false;
+ for (tree t = TREE_CHAIN (list); t; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
{
- fate = more_specialized_partial_spec (tmpl, champ, t);
+ int fate = more_specialized_partial_spec (tmpl, champ, t);
if (fate == 1)
;
else
@@ -25868,9 +25861,9 @@ most_specialized_partial_spec (tree target, tsubst_flags_t complain)
}
if (!ambiguous_p)
- for (t = list; t && t != champ; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
+ for (tree t = list; t && t != champ; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
{
- fate = more_specialized_partial_spec (tmpl, champ, t);
+ int fate = more_specialized_partial_spec (tmpl, champ, t);
if (fate != 1)
{
ambiguous_p = true;
@@ -25889,7 +25882,7 @@ most_specialized_partial_spec (tree target, tsubst_flags_t complain)
else
error ("ambiguous template instantiation for %q#D", target);
str = ngettext ("candidate is:", "candidates are:", list_length (list));
- for (t = list; t; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
+ for (tree t = list; t; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
{
tree subst = build_tree_list (TREE_VALUE (t), TREE_PURPOSE (t));
inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (TREE_VALUE (t)),
--
2.37.2.490.g6c8e4ee870
next reply other threads:[~2022-08-31 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-31 21:15 Patrick Palka [this message]
2022-08-31 21:15 ` Patrick Palka
2022-09-01 18:40 ` Jason Merrill
2023-04-26 19:45 ` Patrick Palka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220831211521.401160-1-ppalka@redhat.com \
--to=ppalka@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jason@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).