public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,
	Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Teach rs6000_opaque_type_invalid_use_p about gcall [PR108348]
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 09:24:58 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230116152458.GH25951@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2422e203-d2bb-30a4-efac-55972c96e074@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 09:05:38PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> > The *_ok things should only be used for features that can be disabled
> > during configuration, or features that we *want* users to be able to
> > turn off (like FP, VMX, VSX, or HMT or QP float, that kind of thing).
> > That gives quite enough permutations to test already, we do not need to
> > create a whole bunch extra for no reason :-)
> 
> Thanks for the explanation!!  I meant to use powerpc_p9modulo_ok to
> exclude those cases where we can't use -mcpu=power9, as you explained we
> should not worry about it!?

But that selector says whether modulo insns are enabled.  This is not
correct to use here.  I know we have abused these things before, but it
needs to be untangled, not made worse :-)

> Since the test point requires altivec support
> (which is implied when specifying -mcpu=power9, I didn't explicitly specify
> it before), I think I could use powerpc_altivec_ok to replace
> powerpc_p9modulo_ok here, does it sound good to you?

VMX can be turned off even with -mcpu=power9.  So yes, it does need
powerpc_altivec_ok.  Does it need VSX even?


Segher

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-16 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-16  8:33 Kewen.Lin
2023-01-16  8:49 ` Segher Boessenkool
2023-01-16  9:20   ` Kewen.Lin
2023-01-16 10:40     ` Segher Boessenkool
2023-01-16 13:05       ` Kewen.Lin
2023-01-16 15:24         ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2023-01-17  2:48           ` Kewen.Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230116152458.GH25951@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bergner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).