public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] middle-end/108625 - wrong folding due to misinterpreted !
@ 2023-02-02 11:33 Richard Biener
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Richard Biener @ 2023-02-02 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches

The following fixes a problem with ! handling in genmatch which isn't
conservative enough when intermediate simplifications push to the
sequence but the final operation appears to just pick an existing
(but in this case newly defined in the sequence) operand.  The easiest
fix is to disallow adding to the sequence when processing !.

Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, pushed.

	PR middle-end/108625
	* genmatch.cc (expr::gen_transform): Also disallow resimplification
	from pushing to lseq with force_leaf.
	(dt_simplify::gen_1): Likewise.

	* gcc.dg/pr108625.c: New testcase.
---
 gcc/genmatch.cc                 |  6 ++++--
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr108625.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr108625.c

diff --git a/gcc/genmatch.cc b/gcc/genmatch.cc
index e147ab9db7a..43bd0212d0e 100644
--- a/gcc/genmatch.cc
+++ b/gcc/genmatch.cc
@@ -2541,7 +2541,8 @@ expr::gen_transform (FILE *f, int indent, const char *dest, bool gimple,
       for (unsigned i = 0; i < ops.length (); ++i)
 	fprintf (f, ", _o%d[%u]", depth, i);
       fprintf (f, ");\n");
-      fprintf_indent (f, indent, "tem_op.resimplify (lseq, valueize);\n");
+      fprintf_indent (f, indent, "tem_op.resimplify (%s, valueize);\n",
+		      !force_leaf ? "lseq" : "NULL");
       fprintf_indent (f, indent,
 		      "_r%d = maybe_push_res_to_seq (&tem_op, %s);\n", depth,
 		      !force_leaf ? "lseq" : "NULL");
@@ -3451,7 +3452,8 @@ dt_simplify::gen_1 (FILE *f, int indent, bool gimple, operand *result)
 	  if (!is_predicate)
 	    {
 	      fprintf_indent (f, indent,
-			      "res_op->resimplify (lseq, valueize);\n");
+			      "res_op->resimplify (%s, valueize);\n",
+			      !e->force_leaf ? "lseq" : "NULL");
 	      if (e->force_leaf)
 		fprintf_indent (f, indent,
 				"if (!maybe_push_res_to_seq (res_op, NULL)) "
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr108625.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr108625.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..03fc2889c4f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr108625.c
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-forwprop1 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
+
+unsigned char foo(int x)
+{
+  int t = -x;
+  unsigned char t1 = t;
+  unsigned char t2 = t;
+  /* We may not rewrite this as (unsigned char)(t - x).  */
+  return t1 + t2;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "x_" 1 "forwprop1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "x_" 1 "optimized" } } */
-- 
2.35.3

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-02-02 11:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-02-02 11:33 [PATCH] middle-end/108625 - wrong folding due to misinterpreted ! Richard Biener

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).