public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] tree-optimization/108816 - vect versioning check split confusion
@ 2023-02-20 10:55 Richard Biener
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Richard Biener @ 2023-02-20 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches

The split of the versioning condition assumes the definition is
in the condition block which is ensured by the versioning code.
But that only works when we actually have to insert any statements
for the versioning condition.  The following adjusts the guard
accordingly and asserts this condition.

Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, pushed.

	PR tree-optimization/108816
	* tree-vect-loop-manip.cc (vect_loop_versioning): Adjust
	versioning condition split prerequesite, assert required
	invariant.

	* gcc.dg/torture/pr108816.c: New testcase.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr108816.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc             |  3 ++-
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr108816.c

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr108816.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr108816.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4c24d5584c1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr108816.c
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-fvect-cost-model=dynamic" } */
+
+int m;
+
+void
+foo (int p[][16], unsigned int x)
+{
+  while (x < 4)
+    {
+      int j;
+
+      for (j = x * 4; j < (x + 1) * 4 - 2; j++)
+        p[0][j] = p[m][j];
+
+      ++x;
+    }
+}
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc
index c04fcf40c44..6aa3d2ed0bf 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc
@@ -3477,7 +3477,7 @@ vect_loop_versioning (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo,
   tree cost_name = NULL_TREE;
   profile_probability prob2 = profile_probability::uninitialized ();
   if (cond_expr
-      && !integer_truep (cond_expr)
+      && EXPR_P (cond_expr)
       && (version_niter
 	  || version_align
 	  || version_alias
@@ -3711,6 +3711,7 @@ vect_loop_versioning (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo,
   if (cost_name && TREE_CODE (cost_name) == SSA_NAME)
     {
       gimple *def = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (cost_name);
+      gcc_assert (gimple_bb (def) == condition_bb);
       /* All uses of the cost check are 'true' after the check we
 	 are going to insert.  */
       replace_uses_by (cost_name, boolean_true_node);
-- 
2.35.3

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-02-20 10:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-02-20 10:55 [PATCH] tree-optimization/108816 - vect versioning check split confusion Richard Biener

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).