public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/2] c++: implement __remove_pointer built-in trait
@ 2023-03-20 22:22 Ken Matsui
  2023-03-20 22:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] libstdc++: use new built-in trait __remove_pointer Ken Matsui
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ken Matsui @ 2023-03-20 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches; +Cc: libstdc++, ppalka, Ken Matsui

This patch implements built-in trait for std::remove_pointer.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* cp-trait.def: Define __remove_pointer.
	* semantics.cc (finish_trait_type): Handle CPTK_REMOVE_POINTER.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C: Test existence of __remove_pointer.
	* g++.dg/ext/remove_pointer.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/cp-trait.def                       |  1 +
 gcc/cp/semantics.cc                       |  4 ++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C  |  3 ++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/remove_pointer.C | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/remove_pointer.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def b/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def
index bac593c0094..985b43e0d97 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def
+++ b/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ DEFTRAIT_EXPR (IS_DEDUCIBLE, "__is_deducible ", 2)
 DEFTRAIT_TYPE (REMOVE_CV, "__remove_cv", 1)
 DEFTRAIT_TYPE (REMOVE_REFERENCE, "__remove_reference", 1)
 DEFTRAIT_TYPE (REMOVE_CVREF, "__remove_cvref", 1)
+DEFTRAIT_TYPE (REMOVE_POINTER, "__remove_pointer", 1)
 DEFTRAIT_TYPE (UNDERLYING_TYPE,  "__underlying_type", 1)
 
 /* These traits yield a type pack, not a type, and are represented by
diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
index 87c2e8a7111..92db1f670ac 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
@@ -12273,6 +12273,10 @@ finish_trait_type (cp_trait_kind kind, tree type1, tree type2)
       if (TYPE_REF_P (type1))
 	type1 = TREE_TYPE (type1);
       return cv_unqualified (type1);
+    case CPTK_REMOVE_POINTER:
+      if (TYPE_PTR_P (type1))
+    type1 = TREE_TYPE (type1);
+      return type1;
 
 #define DEFTRAIT_EXPR(CODE, NAME, ARITY) \
     case CPTK_##CODE:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C
index f343e153e56..e21e0a95509 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C
@@ -146,3 +146,6 @@
 #if !__has_builtin (__remove_cvref)
 # error "__has_builtin (__remove_cvref) failed"
 #endif
+#if !__has_builtin (__remove_pointer)
+# error "__has_builtin (__remove_pointer) failed"
+#endif
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/remove_pointer.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/remove_pointer.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7b13db93950
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/remove_pointer.C
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+#define SA(X) static_assert((X),#X)
+
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int), int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int*), int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int**), int*));
+
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int*), const int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int**), const int*));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* const), int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int** const), int*));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* const* const), int* const));
+
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int*), volatile int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int**), volatile int*));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* volatile), int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int** volatile), int*));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* volatile* volatile), int* volatile));
+
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const volatile int*), const volatile int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const volatile int**), const volatile int*));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int* volatile), const int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int* const), volatile int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* const volatile), int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int** volatile), const int*));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int** const), volatile int*));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int** const volatile), int*));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* const* const volatile), int* const));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* volatile* const volatile), int* volatile));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* const volatile* const volatile), int* const volatile));
+
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int&), int&));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int&), const int&));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int&), volatile int&));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const volatile int&), const volatile int&));
+
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int&&), int&&));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int&&), const int&&));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int&&), volatile int&&));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const volatile int&&), const volatile int&&));
+
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int[3]), int[3]));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int[3]), const int[3]));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int[3]), volatile int[3]));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const volatile int[3]), const volatile int[3]));
+
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int(int)), int(int)));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int(*const)(int)), int(int)));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int(*volatile)(int)), int(int)));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int(*const volatile)(int)), int(int)));
-- 
2.40.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] c++: implement __remove_pointer built-in trait
@ 2023-06-15 12:21 Ken Matsui
  2023-06-15 12:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] libstdc++: use new built-in trait __remove_pointer Ken Matsui
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ken Matsui @ 2023-06-15 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches; +Cc: libstdc++, Ken Matsui

This patch implements built-in trait for std::remove_pointer.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* cp-trait.def: Define __remove_pointer.
	* semantics.cc (finish_trait_type): Handle CPTK_REMOVE_POINTER.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C: Test existence of __remove_pointer.
	* g++.dg/ext/remove_pointer.C: New test.

Signed-off-by: Ken Matsui <kmatsui@cs.washington.edu>
---
 gcc/cp/cp-trait.def                       |  1 +
 gcc/cp/semantics.cc                       |  4 ++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C  |  3 ++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/remove_pointer.C | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/remove_pointer.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def b/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def
index 8b7fece0cc8..07823e55579 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def
+++ b/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ DEFTRAIT_EXPR (IS_DEDUCIBLE, "__is_deducible ", 2)
 DEFTRAIT_TYPE (REMOVE_CV, "__remove_cv", 1)
 DEFTRAIT_TYPE (REMOVE_REFERENCE, "__remove_reference", 1)
 DEFTRAIT_TYPE (REMOVE_CVREF, "__remove_cvref", 1)
+DEFTRAIT_TYPE (REMOVE_POINTER, "__remove_pointer", 1)
 DEFTRAIT_TYPE (UNDERLYING_TYPE,  "__underlying_type", 1)
 DEFTRAIT_TYPE (TYPE_PACK_ELEMENT, "__type_pack_element", -1)
 
diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
index 8fb47fd179e..885c7a6fb64 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
@@ -12373,6 +12373,10 @@ finish_trait_type (cp_trait_kind kind, tree type1, tree type2,
       if (TYPE_REF_P (type1))
 	type1 = TREE_TYPE (type1);
       return cv_unqualified (type1);
+    case CPTK_REMOVE_POINTER:
+      if (TYPE_PTR_P (type1))
+    type1 = TREE_TYPE (type1);
+      return type1;
 
     case CPTK_TYPE_PACK_ELEMENT:
       return finish_type_pack_element (type1, type2, complain);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C
index f343e153e56..e21e0a95509 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C
@@ -146,3 +146,6 @@
 #if !__has_builtin (__remove_cvref)
 # error "__has_builtin (__remove_cvref) failed"
 #endif
+#if !__has_builtin (__remove_pointer)
+# error "__has_builtin (__remove_pointer) failed"
+#endif
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/remove_pointer.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/remove_pointer.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7b13db93950
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/remove_pointer.C
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+#define SA(X) static_assert((X),#X)
+
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int), int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int*), int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int**), int*));
+
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int*), const int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int**), const int*));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* const), int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int** const), int*));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* const* const), int* const));
+
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int*), volatile int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int**), volatile int*));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* volatile), int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int** volatile), int*));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* volatile* volatile), int* volatile));
+
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const volatile int*), const volatile int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const volatile int**), const volatile int*));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int* volatile), const int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int* const), volatile int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* const volatile), int));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int** volatile), const int*));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int** const), volatile int*));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int** const volatile), int*));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* const* const volatile), int* const));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* volatile* const volatile), int* volatile));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* const volatile* const volatile), int* const volatile));
+
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int&), int&));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int&), const int&));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int&), volatile int&));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const volatile int&), const volatile int&));
+
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int&&), int&&));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int&&), const int&&));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int&&), volatile int&&));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const volatile int&&), const volatile int&&));
+
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int[3]), int[3]));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int[3]), const int[3]));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int[3]), volatile int[3]));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const volatile int[3]), const volatile int[3]));
+
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int(int)), int(int)));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int(*const)(int)), int(int)));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int(*volatile)(int)), int(int)));
+SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int(*const volatile)(int)), int(int)));
-- 
2.41.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] c++: implement __remove_pointer built-in trait
@ 2023-06-24 10:07 Ken Matsui
  2023-06-24 10:12 ` Ken Matsui
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ken Matsui @ 2023-06-24 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick Palka; +Cc: gcc-patches

On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 8:22 AM Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 17 Jun 2023, Ken Matsui via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I conducted a benchmark for remove_pointer as well as is_object. Just
> > like the is_object benchmark, here is the benchmark code:
> >
> > https://github.com/ken-matsui/gcc-benches/blob/main/remove_pointer_benchmark.cc
> >
> > On my computer, using the gcc HEAD of this patch for a release build,
> > the patch with -DUSE_BUILTIN took 8.7% less time and used 4.3-4.9%
> > less memory on average compared to not using it. Although the
> > performance improvement was not as significant as with is_object, the
> > benchmark demonstrated that the compilation was consistently more
> > efficient.
>
> Thanks for the benchmark.  The improvement is lesser than I expected,
> but that might be because the benchmark is "biased":
>
>   template <std::size_t N, std::size_t Count = 256>
>   struct Instantiator : Instantiator<N, Count - 1> {
>       static_assert(!std::is_pointer_v<remove_pointer_t<Instantiator>>);
>   };
>
> This only invokes remove_pointer_t on the non-pointer type Instantiator,
> and so the benchmark doesn't factor in the performance of the trait when
> invoked on pointer types, and traits typically will have different
> performance characteristics depending on the kind of type it's given.
>
> To more holistically assess the real-world performance of the trait the
> benchmark should also consider pointer types and maybe also cv-qualified
> types (given that the original implementation is in terms of
> __remove_cv_t and thus performance of the original implementation may be
> sensitive to cv-qualification).  So we should probably uniformly
> benchmark these classes of types, via doing e.g.:
>
>   static_assert(!std::is_pointer_v<remove_pointer_t<Instantiator>>);
>   static_assert(!std::is_pointer_v<remove_pointer_t<Instantiator*>>);
>   static_assert(!std::is_pointer_v<remove_pointer_t<const Instantiator>>);
>   static_assert(!std::is_pointer_v<remove_pointer_t<Instantiator* const>>);
>
> (We could consider other kinds of types too, e.g. reference types and
> integral types, but it seems clear based on the implementations being
> benchmarked that performance won't be sensitive to reference-ness
> or integral-ness.)

Thank you for your review! I totally agree with your opinion that the
benchmark should have been exhaustive. I conducted a benchmark for
this new change:

https://github.com/ken-matsui/gcc-benches/blob/main/remove_pointer.md#tue-jun-20-030313-pm-pdt-2023

Time: -27.918%
Peak Memory Usage: -19.0755%
Total Memory Usage: -20.0199%

> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Ken Matsui
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 5:22 AM Ken Matsui <kmatsui@cs.washington.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch implements built-in trait for std::remove_pointer.
> > >
> > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > >         * cp-trait.def: Define __remove_pointer.
> > >         * semantics.cc (finish_trait_type): Handle CPTK_REMOVE_POINTER.
> > >
> > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > >         * g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C: Test existence of __remove_pointer.
> > >         * g++.dg/ext/remove_pointer.C: New test.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ken Matsui <kmatsui@cs.washington.edu>
> > > ---
> > >  gcc/cp/cp-trait.def                       |  1 +
> > >  gcc/cp/semantics.cc                       |  4 ++
> > >  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C  |  3 ++
> > >  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/remove_pointer.C | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  4 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/remove_pointer.C
> > >
> > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def b/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def
> > > index 8b7fece0cc8..07823e55579 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def
> > > +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-trait.def
> > > @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ DEFTRAIT_EXPR (IS_DEDUCIBLE, "__is_deducible ", 2)
> > >  DEFTRAIT_TYPE (REMOVE_CV, "__remove_cv", 1)
> > >  DEFTRAIT_TYPE (REMOVE_REFERENCE, "__remove_reference", 1)
> > >  DEFTRAIT_TYPE (REMOVE_CVREF, "__remove_cvref", 1)
> > > +DEFTRAIT_TYPE (REMOVE_POINTER, "__remove_pointer", 1)
> > >  DEFTRAIT_TYPE (UNDERLYING_TYPE,  "__underlying_type", 1)
> > >  DEFTRAIT_TYPE (TYPE_PACK_ELEMENT, "__type_pack_element", -1)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
> > > index 8fb47fd179e..885c7a6fb64 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
> > > +++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
> > > @@ -12373,6 +12373,10 @@ finish_trait_type (cp_trait_kind kind, tree type1, tree type2,
> > >        if (TYPE_REF_P (type1))
> > >         type1 = TREE_TYPE (type1);
> > >        return cv_unqualified (type1);
> > > +    case CPTK_REMOVE_POINTER:
> > > +      if (TYPE_PTR_P (type1))
> > > +    type1 = TREE_TYPE (type1);
> > > +      return type1;
>
> Maybe add a newline before the 'case' to visually separate it from the
> previous 'case'?  LGTM otherwise, thanks!

Will do! Thank you!

> > >
> > >      case CPTK_TYPE_PACK_ELEMENT:
> > >        return finish_type_pack_element (type1, type2, complain);
> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C
> > > index f343e153e56..e21e0a95509 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-builtin-1.C
> > > @@ -146,3 +146,6 @@
> > >  #if !__has_builtin (__remove_cvref)
> > >  # error "__has_builtin (__remove_cvref) failed"
> > >  #endif
> > > +#if !__has_builtin (__remove_pointer)
> > > +# error "__has_builtin (__remove_pointer) failed"
> > > +#endif
> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/remove_pointer.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/remove_pointer.C
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000000..7b13db93950
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/remove_pointer.C
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> > > +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> > > +
> > > +#define SA(X) static_assert((X),#X)
> > > +
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int), int));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int*), int));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int**), int*));
> > > +
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int*), const int));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int**), const int*));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* const), int));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int** const), int*));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* const* const), int* const));
> > > +
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int*), volatile int));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int**), volatile int*));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* volatile), int));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int** volatile), int*));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* volatile* volatile), int* volatile));
> > > +
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const volatile int*), const volatile int));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const volatile int**), const volatile int*));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int* volatile), const int));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int* const), volatile int));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* const volatile), int));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int** volatile), const int*));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int** const), volatile int*));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int** const volatile), int*));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* const* const volatile), int* const));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* volatile* const volatile), int* volatile));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int* const volatile* const volatile), int* const volatile));
> > > +
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int&), int&));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int&), const int&));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int&), volatile int&));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const volatile int&), const volatile int&));
> > > +
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int&&), int&&));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int&&), const int&&));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int&&), volatile int&&));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const volatile int&&), const volatile int&&));
> > > +
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int[3]), int[3]));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const int[3]), const int[3]));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(volatile int[3]), volatile int[3]));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(const volatile int[3]), const volatile int[3]));
> > > +
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int(int)), int(int)));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int(*const)(int)), int(int)));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int(*volatile)(int)), int(int)));
> > > +SA(__is_same(__remove_pointer(int(*const volatile)(int)), int(int)));
> > > --
> > > 2.41.0
> > >
> >
> >

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-24 10:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-03-20 22:22 [PATCH 1/2] c++: implement __remove_pointer built-in trait Ken Matsui
2023-03-20 22:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] libstdc++: use new built-in trait __remove_pointer Ken Matsui
2023-06-15 12:21 [PATCH 1/2] c++: implement __remove_pointer built-in trait Ken Matsui
2023-06-15 12:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] libstdc++: use new built-in trait __remove_pointer Ken Matsui
2023-06-24 10:07 [PATCH 1/2] c++: implement __remove_pointer built-in trait Ken Matsui
2023-06-24 10:12 ` Ken Matsui
2023-06-24 10:12   ` [PATCH 2/2] libstdc++: use new built-in trait __remove_pointer Ken Matsui

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).