public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [pushed] c++: fix contracts with NRV
@ 2023-06-07  1:30 Jason Merrill
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jason Merrill @ 2023-06-07  1:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches

Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.

-- 8< --

The NRV implementation was blindly replacing the operand of RETURN_EXPR,
clobbering anything that check_return_expr might have added on to the actual
initialization, such as checking the postcondition.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* semantics.cc (finalize_nrv_r): [RETURN_EXPR]: Only replace the
	INIT_EXPR.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/contracts/contracts-post7.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/semantics.cc                           | 12 ++++++--
 .../g++.dg/contracts/contracts-post7.C        | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/contracts/contracts-post7.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
index c04514679f0..c94ea090a99 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
@@ -4940,9 +4940,17 @@ finalize_nrv_r (tree* tp, int* walk_subtrees, void* data)
     *walk_subtrees = 0;
   /* Change all returns to just refer to the RESULT_DECL; this is a nop,
      but differs from using NULL_TREE in that it indicates that we care
-     about the value of the RESULT_DECL.  */
+     about the value of the RESULT_DECL.  But preserve anything appended
+     by check_return_expr.  */
   else if (TREE_CODE (*tp) == RETURN_EXPR)
-    TREE_OPERAND (*tp, 0) = dp->result;
+    {
+      tree *p = &TREE_OPERAND (*tp, 0);
+      while (TREE_CODE (*p) == COMPOUND_EXPR)
+	p = &TREE_OPERAND (*p, 0);
+      gcc_checking_assert (TREE_CODE (*p) == INIT_EXPR
+			   && TREE_OPERAND (*p, 0) == dp->result);
+      *p = dp->result;
+    }
   /* Change all cleanups for the NRV to only run when an exception is
      thrown.  */
   else if (TREE_CODE (*tp) == CLEANUP_STMT
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/contracts/contracts-post7.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/contracts/contracts-post7.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1c33181b5e6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/contracts/contracts-post7.C
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+// { dg-do run }
+// { dg-options "-std=c++2a -fcontracts" }
+
+#include <experimental/contract>
+
+using std::experimental::contract_violation;
+void handle_contract_violation(const contract_violation &violation)
+{
+  __builtin_exit (0);
+}
+
+struct A {
+  int i;
+  A(): i(42) {}
+  A(const A&);
+};
+
+A f()
+  [[ post r: r.i == 24 ]]
+{
+  A a;
+  return a;
+}
+
+int main()
+{
+  f();
+  return -1;
+}

base-commit: 29c82c6ca929e0f5eccfe038dea71177d814c6b7
prerequisite-patch-id: aed53cdac161144c31cb1433282e1ad1d49d3770
-- 
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-06-07  1:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-06-07  1:30 [pushed] c++: fix contracts with NRV Jason Merrill

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).