[PATCH] MATCH: Fix comment for `(zero_one ==/!= 0) ? y : z <op> y` patterns

[PATCH] MATCH: Fix comment for `(zero_one ==/!= 0) ? y : z <op> y` patterns

[Andrew Pinski]

The patterns match more than just `a & 1` so change the comment
for these two patterns to say that.

Committed as obvious after a bootstrap/test on x86_64-linux-gnu.

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* match.pd: Fix comment for the
	`(zero_one ==/!= 0) ? y : z <op> y` patterns.
---
 gcc/match.pd | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index dc36927cd0f..8f3d99239ce 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -3688,7 +3688,7 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
   (cond (le @0 integer_zerop@1) (negate@2 @0) integer_zerop@1)
   (max @2 @1))
 
-/* ((x & 0x1) == 0) ? y : z <op> y -> (-(typeof(y))(x & 0x1) & z) <op> y */
+/* (zero_one == 0) ? y : z <op> y -> (-(typeof(y))zero_one & z) <op> y */
 (for op (bit_xor bit_ior)
  (simplify
   (cond (eq zero_one_valued_p@0
@@ -3700,7 +3700,7 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
        && (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@0))))
        (op (bit_and (negate (convert:type @0)) @2) @1))))
 
-/* ((x & 0x1) == 0) ? z <op> y : y -> (-(typeof(y))(x & 0x1) & z) <op> y */
+/* (zero_one != 0) ? z <op> y : y -> (-(typeof(y))zero_one & z) <op> y */
 (for op (bit_xor bit_ior)
  (simplify
   (cond (ne zero_one_valued_p@0
-- 
2.31.1