[PATCH] Fix expectation on gcc.dg/vect/pr71264.c

[PATCH] Fix expectation on gcc.dg/vect/pr71264.c

[Richard Biener]

With the recent change to more reliably not vectorize code already
using vector types we run into FAILs of gcc.dg/vect/pr71264.c
The testcase was added for fixing an ICE and possible (re-)vectorization
of the code isn't really supported and I suspect might even go
wrong for non-bitops.

The following leaves the testcase as just testing for an ICE.

Pushed.

	PR tree-optimization/110544
	* gcc.dg/vect/pr71264.c: Remove scan for vectorization.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr71264.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr71264.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr71264.c
index 1381e0ed132..b372c00832a 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr71264.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr71264.c
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */
 
 typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
 typedef uint8_t footype __attribute__((vector_size(4)));
@@ -18,5 +17,3 @@ void test(uint8_t *ptr, uint8_t *mask)
       __builtin_memcpy(&ptr[i], &temp, sizeof(temp));
     }
 }
-
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "vectorized 1 loops in function" "vect" { xfail { { s390*-*-* sparc*-*-* } || vect32 } } } } */
-- 
2.35.3