From: YunQiang Su <yunqiang.su@cipunited.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: pinskia@gmail.com, jeffreyalaw@gmail.com, ian@airs.com,
rguenther@suse.de, YunQiang Su <yunqiang.su@cipunited.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] Store_bit_field_1: Use SUBREG instead of REG if possible
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 12:16:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230719041639.2967597-1-yunqiang.su@cipunited.com> (raw)
PR #104914
When work with
int val;
((unsigned char*)&val)[3] = *buf;
if (val > 0) ...
The RTX mode is obtained from REG instead of SUBREG, which make
D<INS> is used instead of <INS>. Thus something wrong happens
on sign-extend default architectures, like MIPS64.
Let's use str_rtx and mode of str_rtx as the parameters for
store_integral_bit_field if:
modes of op0 and str_rtx are INT;
length of op0 is greater than str_rtx.
This patch has been tested on aarch64-linux-gnu, x86_64-linux-gnu,
mips64el-linux-gnuabi64 without regression.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR: 104914.
* expmed.cc(store_bit_field_1): Pass str_rtx and its mode
to store_integral_bit_field if the length of op0 is greater
than str_rtx.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR: 104914.
* gcc.target/mips/pr104914.c: New testcase.
---
gcc/expmed.cc | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/pr104914.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/pr104914.c
diff --git a/gcc/expmed.cc b/gcc/expmed.cc
index fbd4ce2d42f..5531c19e891 100644
--- a/gcc/expmed.cc
+++ b/gcc/expmed.cc
@@ -850,6 +850,7 @@ store_bit_field_1 (rtx str_rtx, poly_uint64 bitsize, poly_uint64 bitnum,
since that case is valid for any mode. The following cases are only
valid for integral modes. */
opt_scalar_int_mode op0_mode = int_mode_for_mode (GET_MODE (op0));
+ opt_scalar_int_mode str_mode = int_mode_for_mode (GET_MODE (str_rtx));
scalar_int_mode imode;
if (!op0_mode.exists (&imode) || imode != GET_MODE (op0))
{
@@ -881,9 +882,22 @@ store_bit_field_1 (rtx str_rtx, poly_uint64 bitsize, poly_uint64 bitnum,
op0 = gen_lowpart (op0_mode.require (), op0);
}
- return store_integral_bit_field (op0, op0_mode, ibitsize, ibitnum,
- bitregion_start, bitregion_end,
- fieldmode, value, reverse, fallback_p);
+ /* If MODEs of str_rtx and op0 are INT, and the length of op0 is greater than
+ str_rtx, it means that str_rtx has a shorter SUBREG: int32 on 64 mach/ABI
+ is an example. For this case, we should use the mode of SUBREG, otherwise
+ bad code will generate for sign-extension ports, like MIPS. */
+ bool use_str_mode = false;
+ if (GET_MODE_CLASS (GET_MODE (str_rtx)) == MODE_INT
+ && GET_MODE_CLASS (GET_MODE (op0)) == MODE_INT
+ && known_gt (GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (op0)),
+ GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (str_rtx))))
+ use_str_mode = true;
+
+ return store_integral_bit_field (use_str_mode ? str_rtx : op0,
+ use_str_mode ? str_mode : op0_mode,
+ ibitsize, ibitnum, bitregion_start,
+ bitregion_end, fieldmode, value,
+ reverse, fallback_p);
}
/* Subroutine of store_bit_field_1, with the same arguments, except
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/pr104914.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/pr104914.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..fd6ef6af446
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/pr104914.c
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=mips64r2 -mabi=64" } */
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tdins\t" } } */
+
+NOMIPS16 int test (const unsigned char *buf)
+{
+ int val;
+ ((unsigned char*)&val)[0] = *buf++;
+ ((unsigned char*)&val)[1] = *buf++;
+ ((unsigned char*)&val)[2] = *buf++;
+ ((unsigned char*)&val)[3] = *buf++;
+ if(val > 0)
+ return 1;
+ else
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2023-07-19 4:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-19 4:16 YunQiang Su [this message]
2023-07-19 6:26 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-19 6:58 ` YunQiang Su
2023-07-19 7:22 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-19 8:21 ` YunQiang Su
2023-07-19 8:25 ` YunQiang Su
2023-07-19 8:50 ` YunQiang Su
2023-07-19 9:23 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-19 9:27 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-19 9:43 ` YunQiang Su
2023-07-19 9:45 ` Eric Botcazou
2023-07-19 10:12 ` YunQiang Su
2023-07-19 10:25 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-19 12:22 ` Jeff Law
2023-07-20 7:09 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-07-20 7:23 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-20 9:22 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-12-22 6:11 ` YunQiang Su
2023-12-22 4:45 ` YunQiang Su
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230719041639.2967597-1-yunqiang.su@cipunited.com \
--to=yunqiang.su@cipunited.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ian@airs.com \
--cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=pinskia@gmail.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).