public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/2] LoongArch: Optimize switch with sign-extended index.
@ 2023-09-02  6:24 Lulu Cheng
  2023-09-02  8:09 ` WANG Xuerui
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lulu Cheng @ 2023-09-02  6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches; +Cc: xry111, i, xuchenghua, Lulu Cheng

The patch refers to the submission of RISCV
7bbce9b50302959286381d9177818642bceaf301.

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* config/loongarch/loongarch.cc (loongarch_extend_comparands):
	In unsigned QImode test, check for sign extended subreg and/or
	constant operands, and do a sign extend in that case.
	* config/loongarch/loongarch.md (TARGET_64BIT): Define
	template cbranchqi4.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c: New test.
---
 gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc              | 14 ++++++++++++--
 gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md              |  8 ++++++--
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
index c72229cad87..7e300c826cf 100644
--- a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
@@ -4228,8 +4228,18 @@ loongarch_extend_comparands (rtx_code code, rtx *op0, rtx *op1)
   /* Comparisons consider all XLEN bits, so extend sub-XLEN values.  */
   if (GET_MODE_SIZE (word_mode) > GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (*op0)))
     {
-      /* TODO: checkout It is more profitable to zero-extend QImode values.  */
-      if (unsigned_condition (code) == code && GET_MODE (*op0) == QImode)
+      /* It is more profitable to zero-extend QImode values.  But not if the
+	 first operand has already been sign-extended, and the second one is
+	 is a constant or has already been sign-extended also.  */
+      if (unsigned_condition (code) == code
+	  && (GET_MODE (*op0) == QImode
+	      && ! (GET_CODE (*op0) == SUBREG
+		    && SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P (*op0)
+		    && SUBREG_PROMOTED_SIGNED_P (*op0)
+		    && (CONST_INT_P (*op1)
+			|| (GET_CODE (*op1) == SUBREG
+			    && SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P (*op1)
+			    && SUBREG_PROMOTED_SIGNED_P (*op1))))))
 	{
 	  *op0 = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (word_mode, *op0);
 	  if (CONST_INT_P (*op1))
diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md
index b37e070660f..1bb4e461b38 100644
--- a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md
+++ b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md
@@ -2733,11 +2733,15 @@ (define_insn "*branch_equality<mode>_inverted"
   [(set_attr "type" "branch")])
 
 
+;; Branches operate on XLEN-sized quantities, but for LoongArch64 we accept
+;; QImode values so we can force zero-extension.
+(define_mode_iterator BR [(QI "TARGET_64BIT") SI (DI "TARGET_64BIT")])
+
 (define_expand "cbranch<mode>4"
   [(set (pc)
 	(if_then_else (match_operator 0 "comparison_operator"
-			[(match_operand:GPR 1 "register_operand")
-			 (match_operand:GPR 2 "nonmemory_operand")])
+			[(match_operand:BR 1 "register_operand")
+			 (match_operand:BR 2 "nonmemory_operand")])
 		      (label_ref (match_operand 3 ""))
 		      (pc)))]
   ""
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..dd192fd497f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=loongarch64 -mabi=lp64d" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "bstrpick" } } */
+
+/* Test for loongarch_extend_comparands patch.  */
+extern void asdf (int);
+void
+foo (signed char x) {
+    switch (x) {
+      case 0: asdf (10); break;
+      case 1: asdf (11); break;
+      case 2: asdf (12); break;
+      case 3: asdf (13); break;
+      case 4: asdf (14); break;
+    }
+}
-- 
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] LoongArch: Optimize switch with sign-extended index.
  2023-09-02  6:24 [PATCH 1/2] LoongArch: Optimize switch with sign-extended index Lulu Cheng
@ 2023-09-02  8:09 ` WANG Xuerui
  2023-09-04  1:52   ` chenglulu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: WANG Xuerui @ 2023-09-02  8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lulu Cheng, gcc-patches; +Cc: xry111, xuchenghua

On 9/2/23 14:24, Lulu Cheng wrote:
> The patch refers to the submission of RISCV
> 7bbce9b50302959286381d9177818642bceaf301.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 	* config/loongarch/loongarch.cc (loongarch_extend_comparands):
> 	In unsigned QImode test, check for sign extended subreg and/or
> 	constant operands, and do a sign extend in that case.
"do a sign extension"
> 	* config/loongarch/loongarch.md (TARGET_64BIT): Define
> 	template cbranchqi4.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 	* gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c: New test.
> ---
>   gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc              | 14 ++++++++++++--
>   gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md              |  8 ++++++--
>   gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
> index c72229cad87..7e300c826cf 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
> @@ -4228,8 +4228,18 @@ loongarch_extend_comparands (rtx_code code, rtx *op0, rtx *op1)
>     /* Comparisons consider all XLEN bits, so extend sub-XLEN values.  */
>     if (GET_MODE_SIZE (word_mode) > GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (*op0)))
>       {
> -      /* TODO: checkout It is more profitable to zero-extend QImode values.  */
> -      if (unsigned_condition (code) == code && GET_MODE (*op0) == QImode)
> +      /* It is more profitable to zero-extend QImode values.  But not if the
> +	 first operand has already been sign-extended, and the second one is
> +	 is a constant or has already been sign-extended also.  */
> +      if (unsigned_condition (code) == code
> +	  && (GET_MODE (*op0) == QImode
> +	      && ! (GET_CODE (*op0) == SUBREG
> +		    && SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P (*op0)
> +		    && SUBREG_PROMOTED_SIGNED_P (*op0)
> +		    && (CONST_INT_P (*op1)
> +			|| (GET_CODE (*op1) == SUBREG
> +			    && SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P (*op1)
> +			    && SUBREG_PROMOTED_SIGNED_P (*op1))))))
>   	{
>   	  *op0 = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (word_mode, *op0);
>   	  if (CONST_INT_P (*op1))
> diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md
> index b37e070660f..1bb4e461b38 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md
> @@ -2733,11 +2733,15 @@ (define_insn "*branch_equality<mode>_inverted"
>     [(set_attr "type" "branch")])
>   
>   
> +;; Branches operate on XLEN-sized quantities, but for LoongArch64 we accept

LoongArch literature refers to "XLEN" as "GRLEN".

Otherwise the patch is fine, thanks ;-)

> +;; QImode values so we can force zero-extension.
> +(define_mode_iterator BR [(QI "TARGET_64BIT") SI (DI "TARGET_64BIT")])
> +
>   (define_expand "cbranch<mode>4"
>     [(set (pc)
>   	(if_then_else (match_operator 0 "comparison_operator"
> -			[(match_operand:GPR 1 "register_operand")
> -			 (match_operand:GPR 2 "nonmemory_operand")])
> +			[(match_operand:BR 1 "register_operand")
> +			 (match_operand:BR 2 "nonmemory_operand")])
>   		      (label_ref (match_operand 3 ""))
>   		      (pc)))]
>     ""
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..dd192fd497f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-march=loongarch64 -mabi=lp64d" } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "bstrpick" } } */
> +
> +/* Test for loongarch_extend_comparands patch.  */
> +extern void asdf (int);
> +void
> +foo (signed char x) {
> +    switch (x) {
> +      case 0: asdf (10); break;
> +      case 1: asdf (11); break;
> +      case 2: asdf (12); break;
> +      case 3: asdf (13); break;
> +      case 4: asdf (14); break;
> +    }
> +}

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re:[pushed] [PATCH 1/2] LoongArch: Optimize switch with sign-extended index.
  2023-09-02  8:09 ` WANG Xuerui
@ 2023-09-04  1:52   ` chenglulu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: chenglulu @ 2023-09-04  1:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: WANG Xuerui, gcc-patches; +Cc: xry111, xuchenghua

Pushed to r14-3642.

The description information was modified and XLEN was changed to GRLEN.

Thanks!:-)


在 2023/9/2 下午4:09, WANG Xuerui 写道:
> On 9/2/23 14:24, Lulu Cheng wrote:
>> The patch refers to the submission of RISCV
>> 7bbce9b50302959286381d9177818642bceaf301.
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>>     * config/loongarch/loongarch.cc (loongarch_extend_comparands):
>>     In unsigned QImode test, check for sign extended subreg and/or
>>     constant operands, and do a sign extend in that case.
> "do a sign extension"
>>     * config/loongarch/loongarch.md (TARGET_64BIT): Define
>>     template cbranchqi4.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>>     * gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c: New test.
>> ---
>>   gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc              | 14 ++++++++++++--
>>   gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md              |  8 ++++++--
>>   gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc 
>> b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
>> index c72229cad87..7e300c826cf 100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
>> @@ -4228,8 +4228,18 @@ loongarch_extend_comparands (rtx_code code, 
>> rtx *op0, rtx *op1)
>>     /* Comparisons consider all XLEN bits, so extend sub-XLEN 
>> values.  */
>>     if (GET_MODE_SIZE (word_mode) > GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (*op0)))
>>       {
>> -      /* TODO: checkout It is more profitable to zero-extend QImode 
>> values.  */
>> -      if (unsigned_condition (code) == code && GET_MODE (*op0) == 
>> QImode)
>> +      /* It is more profitable to zero-extend QImode values. But not 
>> if the
>> +     first operand has already been sign-extended, and the second 
>> one is
>> +     is a constant or has already been sign-extended also.  */
>> +      if (unsigned_condition (code) == code
>> +      && (GET_MODE (*op0) == QImode
>> +          && ! (GET_CODE (*op0) == SUBREG
>> +            && SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P (*op0)
>> +            && SUBREG_PROMOTED_SIGNED_P (*op0)
>> +            && (CONST_INT_P (*op1)
>> +            || (GET_CODE (*op1) == SUBREG
>> +                && SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P (*op1)
>> +                && SUBREG_PROMOTED_SIGNED_P (*op1))))))
>>       {
>>         *op0 = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (word_mode, *op0);
>>         if (CONST_INT_P (*op1))
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md 
>> b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md
>> index b37e070660f..1bb4e461b38 100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md
>> +++ b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md
>> @@ -2733,11 +2733,15 @@ (define_insn "*branch_equality<mode>_inverted"
>>     [(set_attr "type" "branch")])
>>     +;; Branches operate on XLEN-sized quantities, but for 
>> LoongArch64 we accept
>
> LoongArch literature refers to "XLEN" as "GRLEN".
>
> Otherwise the patch is fine, thanks ;-)
>
>> +;; QImode values so we can force zero-extension.
>> +(define_mode_iterator BR [(QI "TARGET_64BIT") SI (DI "TARGET_64BIT")])
>> +
>>   (define_expand "cbranch<mode>4"
>>     [(set (pc)
>>       (if_then_else (match_operator 0 "comparison_operator"
>> -            [(match_operand:GPR 1 "register_operand")
>> -             (match_operand:GPR 2 "nonmemory_operand")])
>> +            [(match_operand:BR 1 "register_operand")
>> +             (match_operand:BR 2 "nonmemory_operand")])
>>                 (label_ref (match_operand 3 ""))
>>                 (pc)))]
>>     ""
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c 
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..dd192fd497f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/switch-qi.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-march=loongarch64 -mabi=lp64d" } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "bstrpick" } } */
>> +
>> +/* Test for loongarch_extend_comparands patch.  */
>> +extern void asdf (int);
>> +void
>> +foo (signed char x) {
>> +    switch (x) {
>> +      case 0: asdf (10); break;
>> +      case 1: asdf (11); break;
>> +      case 2: asdf (12); break;
>> +      case 3: asdf (13); break;
>> +      case 4: asdf (14); break;
>> +    }
>> +}


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-09-04  1:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-02  6:24 [PATCH 1/2] LoongArch: Optimize switch with sign-extended index Lulu Cheng
2023-09-02  8:09 ` WANG Xuerui
2023-09-04  1:52   ` chenglulu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).