* [PATCH] TEST: Add vectorization check
@ 2023-10-09 14:59 Juzhe-Zhong
2023-10-12 16:53 ` Jeff Law
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Juzhe-Zhong @ 2023-10-09 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: jeffreyalaw, Juzhe-Zhong
These cases won't check SLP for load_lanes support target.
Add vectorization check for situations.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-2.c: Add vectorization check.
* gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-3.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-4.c: Ditto.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-2.c | 1 +
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-3.c | 1 +
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-4.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-2.c
index 7d8d2691432..60e8e8516fc 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-2.c
@@ -27,3 +27,4 @@ void foo1x1(double* restrict y, const double* restrict x, int clen)
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "vectorizing stmts using SLP" "vect" { target { ! { vect_load_lanes && vect_strided8 } } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Loop contains only SLP stmts" "vect" { target { ! { vect_load_lanes && vect_strided8 } } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-3.c
index c0603e1432e..2dc76e5b565 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-3.c
@@ -48,3 +48,4 @@ void foo(double* restrict y, const double* restrict x0, const double* restrict x
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "vectorizing stmts using SLP" "vect" { target { ! { vect_load_lanes && vect_strided8 } } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Loop contains only SLP stmts" "vect" { target { ! { vect_load_lanes && vect_strided8 } } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-4.c
index c03442816a4..7e74c9313d5 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-4.c
@@ -26,3 +26,4 @@ void foo1x1(double* restrict y, const double* restrict x, int clen)
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "vectorizing stmts using SLP" "vect" { target { ! { vect_load_lanes && vect_strided8 } } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Loop contains only SLP stmts" "vect" { target { ! { vect_load_lanes && vect_strided8 } } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" } } */
--
2.36.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] TEST: Add vectorization check
2023-10-09 14:59 [PATCH] TEST: Add vectorization check Juzhe-Zhong
@ 2023-10-12 16:53 ` Jeff Law
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Law @ 2023-10-12 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juzhe-Zhong, gcc-patches
On 10/9/23 08:59, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
> These cases won't check SLP for load_lanes support target.
>
> Add vectorization check for situations.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-2.c: Add vectorization check.
> * gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-3.c: Ditto.
> * gcc.dg/vect/pr97832-4.c: Ditto.
So has this been checked on anything other than riscv? It would be good
to know that these aren't likely to introduce new FAILs.
I would think you could build and x86 compiler and just run the vect.exp
tests with and without this patch (so you don't need to do a full
regression run).
Assuming it doesn't cause any new x86 FAILs, this is fine for the trunk.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-12 16:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-10-09 14:59 [PATCH] TEST: Add vectorization check Juzhe-Zhong
2023-10-12 16:53 ` Jeff Law
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).