From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: Fei Gao <gaofei@eswincomputing.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: kito.cheng@gmail.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, zengxiao@eswincomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] [ifcvt] optimize x=c ? (y AND z) : y by RISC-V Zicond like insns
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:16:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25deb70e-4bc3-42a5-97f6-8597e9802c68@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231205081248.2106-3-gaofei@eswincomputing.com>
On 12/5/23 01:12, Fei Gao wrote:
> Take the following case for example.
>
> CFLAGS: -march=rv64gc_zbb_zicond -mabi=lp64d -O2
>
> long
> test_AND_ceqz (long x, long y, long z, long c)
> {
> if (c)
> x = y & z;
> else
> x = y;
> return x;
> }
>
> Before patch:
>
> and a2,a1,a2
> czero.eqz a0,a2,a3
> czero.nez a3,a1,a3
> or a0,a3,a0
> ret
>
> After patch:
> and a0,a1,a2
> czero.nez a1,a1,a3
> or a0,a1,a0
FWIW I was having a conversation with Andrew W. a little while ago and
his preference was to change the IOR into an ADD. We have a better
chance of using a compressed variant as c.add allows the full set of
registers while c.or only allows a subset of registers. Given one of
the two input registers in that IOR will always have the value zero, it
should be equivalent.
Given this is target independent code we have to be careful, but I'm not
immediately aware of a target where using ADD would be worse than IOR
here. Anyway, feel free to submit a patch for that minor change, it'll
need to queue for gcc-15, but should be non-controversial at that time.
The same trick can be done in the conditional move expander within riscv.cc.
>
> Co-authored-by: Xiao Zeng<zengxiao@eswincomputing.com>
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * ifcvt.cc (noce_cond_zero_binary_op_supported): Add support for AND.
> (noce_bbs_ok_for_cond_zero_arith): Likewise.
> (noce_try_cond_zero_arith): Likewise.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.target/riscv/zicond_ifcvt_opt.c: add TCs for AND.
This looks fine. I'll need to adjust the matches in the test file
because we're not supporting SUBREGs. I can do that easy enough.
I 3-stage bootstrapped and regression tested this on x86_64 as well as
regression tested it in rv64gc.
I'll push it to the trunk shortly.
jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-11 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-05 8:12 [PATCH 1/5][V3][ifcvt] optimize x=c ? (y op " Fei Gao
2023-12-05 8:12 ` [PATCH 2/5] [ifcvt] optimize x=c ? (y shift_op z):y " Fei Gao
2023-12-10 20:43 ` Jeff Law
2023-12-11 4:01 ` Fei Gao
2023-12-11 6:15 ` Jeff Law
2023-12-05 8:12 ` [PATCH 3/5] [ifcvt] optimize x=c ? (y AND z) : y " Fei Gao
2023-12-11 5:16 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2023-12-05 8:12 ` [PATCH 4/5] [ifcvt] optimize x=c ? (y op const_int) " Fei Gao
2023-12-11 5:38 ` Jeff Law
2023-12-14 8:42 ` Fei Gao
2023-12-05 8:12 ` [PATCH 5/5] [ifcvt] optimize extension for x=c ? (y op z) " Fei Gao
2023-12-11 5:46 ` Jeff Law
2023-12-14 9:32 ` Fei Gao
2023-12-08 0:49 ` [PATCH 1/5][V3][ifcvt] optimize " Jeff Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25deb70e-4bc3-42a5-97f6-8597e9802c68@gmail.com \
--to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=gaofei@eswincomputing.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=zengxiao@eswincomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).