From: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>
To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Cc: Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
"joseph@codesourcery.com" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
"richard.guenther@gmail.com" <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
"jakub@redhat.com" <jakub@redhat.com>,
"keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"siddhesh@gotplt.org" <siddhesh@gotplt.org>,
"uecker@tugraz.at" <uecker@tugraz.at>
Subject: Re: [V7][PATCH 1/2] Handle component_ref to a structre/union field including flexible array member [PR101832]
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 15:21:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <28506319-0176-4620-A17F-859EEA0F4B5A@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BA098566-B9AF-4283-BE60-1450B3B8BA2A@gmail.com>
> On May 25, 2023, at 1:41 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 24 May 2023 16:09:21 CEST, Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Bernhard,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your comments.
>>
>>> On May 19, 2023, at 7:11 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 19 May 2023 20:49:47 +0000
>>> Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> GCC extension accepts the case when a struct with a flexible array member
>>>> is embedded into another struct or union (possibly recursively).
>>>
>>> Do you mean TYPE_TRAILING_FLEXARRAY()?
>>
>> The following might be more accurate description:
>>
>> GCC extension accepts the case when a struct with a flexible array member
>> is embedded into another struct or union (possibly recursively) as the last field.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/gcc/tree.h b/gcc/tree.h
>>>> index 0b72663e6a1..237644e788e 100644
>>>> --- a/gcc/tree.h
>>>> +++ b/gcc/tree.h
>>>> @@ -786,7 +786,12 @@ extern void omp_clause_range_check_failed (const_tree, const char *, int,
>>>> (...) prototype, where arguments can be accessed with va_start and
>>>> va_arg), as opposed to an unprototyped function. */
>>>> #define TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P(NODE) \
>>>> - (TYPE_CHECK (NODE)->type_common.no_named_args_stdarg_p)
>>>> + (FUNC_OR_METHOD_CHECK (NODE)->type_common.no_named_args_stdarg_p)
>>>> +
>>>> +/* True if this RECORD_TYPE or UNION_TYPE includes a flexible array member
>>>> + at the last field recursively. */
>>>> +#define TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY(NODE) \
>>>> + (RECORD_OR_UNION_CHECK (NODE)->type_common.no_named_args_stdarg_p)
>>>
>>> Until i read the description above i read TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY as an
>>> option to include or not include something. The description hints more
>>> at TYPE_INCLUDES_FLEXARRAY (with an S) to be a type which has at least
>>> one member which has a trailing flexible array or which itself has a
>>> trailing flexible array.
>>
>> Yes, TYPE_INCLUDES_FLEXARRAY (maybe with a S is a better name) means the structure/union TYPE includes a flexible array member or includes a struct with a flexible array member as the last field.
>>
>
> So ANY_TRAILING_FLEXARRAY or TYPE_CONTAINS_FLEXARRAY, TYPE_INCLUDES_FLEXARRAY or something like that would be more clear, i don't know.
> I'd probably use the first, but that's enough bike shedding for me now. Let's see what others think.
Thanks. I changed it to TYPE_INCLUDES_FLEXARRAY.
Qing
>
> thanks,
>
>> Hope this is clear.
>> thanks.
>>
>> Qing
>>>
>>>>
>>>> /* In an IDENTIFIER_NODE, this means that assemble_name was called with
>>>> this string as an argument. */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-25 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-19 20:49 [V7][PATCH 0/2]Accept and Handle the case when a structure including a FAM nested in another structure Qing Zhao
2023-05-19 20:49 ` [V7][PATCH 1/2] Handle component_ref to a structre/union field including flexible array member [PR101832] Qing Zhao
2023-05-19 23:11 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2023-05-24 14:09 ` Qing Zhao
2023-05-25 5:41 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2023-05-25 15:21 ` Qing Zhao [this message]
2023-05-19 20:49 ` [V7][PATCH 2/2] Update documentation to clarify a GCC extension [PR77650] Qing Zhao
2023-05-19 21:12 ` Joseph Myers
2023-05-24 13:05 ` Qing Zhao
2023-05-24 16:57 ` Qing Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=28506319-0176-4620-A17F-859EEA0F4B5A@oracle.com \
--to=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
--cc=uecker@tugraz.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).