public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>
To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Cc: Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	"joseph@codesourcery.com" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
	"richard.guenther@gmail.com" <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
	"jakub@redhat.com" <jakub@redhat.com>,
	"keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"siddhesh@gotplt.org" <siddhesh@gotplt.org>,
	"uecker@tugraz.at" <uecker@tugraz.at>
Subject: Re: [V7][PATCH 1/2] Handle component_ref to a structre/union field including flexible array member [PR101832]
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 15:21:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <28506319-0176-4620-A17F-859EEA0F4B5A@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BA098566-B9AF-4283-BE60-1450B3B8BA2A@gmail.com>



> On May 25, 2023, at 1:41 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 24 May 2023 16:09:21 CEST, Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Bernhard,
>> 
>> Thanks a lot for your comments.
>> 
>>> On May 19, 2023, at 7:11 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Fri, 19 May 2023 20:49:47 +0000
>>> Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> GCC extension accepts the case when a struct with a flexible array member
>>>> is embedded into another struct or union (possibly recursively).
>>> 
>>> Do you mean TYPE_TRAILING_FLEXARRAY()?
>> 
>> The following might be more accurate description:
>> 
>> GCC extension accepts the case when a struct with a flexible array member
>> is embedded into another struct or union (possibly recursively) as the last field.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/gcc/tree.h b/gcc/tree.h
>>>> index 0b72663e6a1..237644e788e 100644
>>>> --- a/gcc/tree.h
>>>> +++ b/gcc/tree.h
>>>> @@ -786,7 +786,12 @@ extern void omp_clause_range_check_failed (const_tree, const char *, int,
>>>>   (...) prototype, where arguments can be accessed with va_start and
>>>>   va_arg), as opposed to an unprototyped function.  */
>>>> #define TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P(NODE) \
>>>> -  (TYPE_CHECK (NODE)->type_common.no_named_args_stdarg_p)
>>>> +  (FUNC_OR_METHOD_CHECK (NODE)->type_common.no_named_args_stdarg_p)
>>>> +
>>>> +/* True if this RECORD_TYPE or UNION_TYPE includes a flexible array member
>>>> +   at the last field recursively.  */
>>>> +#define TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY(NODE) \
>>>> +  (RECORD_OR_UNION_CHECK (NODE)->type_common.no_named_args_stdarg_p)
>>> 
>>> Until i read the description above i read TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY as an
>>> option to include or not include something. The description hints more
>>> at TYPE_INCLUDES_FLEXARRAY (with an S) to be a type which has at least
>>> one member which has a trailing flexible array or which itself has a
>>> trailing flexible array.
>> 
>> Yes, TYPE_INCLUDES_FLEXARRAY (maybe with a S is a better name) means the structure/union TYPE includes a flexible array member or includes a struct with a flexible array member as the last field.
>> 
> 
> So ANY_TRAILING_FLEXARRAY or TYPE_CONTAINS_FLEXARRAY, TYPE_INCLUDES_FLEXARRAY or something like that would be more clear, i don't know.
> I'd probably use the first, but that's enough bike shedding for me now. Let's see what others think.

Thanks. I changed it to TYPE_INCLUDES_FLEXARRAY.

Qing
> 
> thanks,
> 
>> Hope this is clear.
>> thanks.
>> 
>> Qing
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> /* In an IDENTIFIER_NODE, this means that assemble_name was called with
>>>>   this string as an argument.  */


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-25 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-19 20:49 [V7][PATCH 0/2]Accept and Handle the case when a structure including a FAM nested in another structure Qing Zhao
2023-05-19 20:49 ` [V7][PATCH 1/2] Handle component_ref to a structre/union field including flexible array member [PR101832] Qing Zhao
2023-05-19 23:11   ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2023-05-24 14:09     ` Qing Zhao
2023-05-25  5:41       ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2023-05-25 15:21         ` Qing Zhao [this message]
2023-05-19 20:49 ` [V7][PATCH 2/2] Update documentation to clarify a GCC extension [PR77650] Qing Zhao
2023-05-19 21:12   ` Joseph Myers
2023-05-24 13:05     ` Qing Zhao
2023-05-24 16:57     ` Qing Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=28506319-0176-4620-A17F-859EEA0F4B5A@oracle.com \
    --to=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
    --cc=uecker@tugraz.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).