public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "joseph@codesourcery.com" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
	"richard.guenther@gmail.com" <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
	"jakub@redhat.com" <jakub@redhat.com>,
	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	"siddhesh@gotplt.org" <siddhesh@gotplt.org>,
	"uecker@tugraz.at" <uecker@tugraz.at>,
	"isanbard@gmail.com" <isanbard@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [V1][PATCH 0/3] New attribute "element_count" to annotate bounds for C99 FAM(PR108896)
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 21:44:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2AA83C79-2EA4-4ACB-A3F6-F55C24A8EDF9@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202305260906.3E824D516@keescook>



> On May 26, 2023, at 12:12 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 04:14:47PM +0000, Qing Zhao wrote:
>> This patch set introduces a new attribute "element_count" to annotate bounds 
>> for C99 flexible array member.
> 
> Thank you for this work! I'm really excited to start using it in the
> Linux kernel. I'll give this a spin, but I know you've already been
> testing this series against the test cases I created earlier, so I don't
> expect any problems. :)
> 
> One bike-shedding note: with the recent "-fbounds-safety" RFC posted for
> LLVM, we may want to consider renaming "element_count" to "counted_by":
> https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-enforcing-bounds-safety-in-c-fbounds-safety/

Yeah, we can do that.

thanks.

Qing
> 
> Thanks again!
> 
> -Kees
> 
> -- 
> Kees Cook


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-30 21:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-25 16:14 Qing Zhao
2023-05-25 16:14 ` [V1][PATCH 1/3] Provide element_count attribute to flexible array member field (PR108896) Qing Zhao
2023-05-25 21:02   ` Joseph Myers
2023-05-26 13:32     ` Qing Zhao
2023-05-26 18:15       ` Joseph Myers
2023-05-26 19:09         ` Qing Zhao
2023-06-07 19:59         ` Qing Zhao
2023-06-07 20:53           ` Joseph Myers
2023-06-07 21:32             ` Qing Zhao
2023-06-07 22:05               ` Joseph Myers
2023-06-08 13:06                 ` Qing Zhao
2023-06-15 15:09                 ` Qing Zhao
2023-06-15 16:55                   ` Joseph Myers
2023-06-15 19:54                     ` Qing Zhao
2023-06-15 22:48                       ` Joseph Myers
2023-06-16 15:01                         ` Qing Zhao
2023-06-16  7:21                     ` Martin Uecker
2023-06-16 15:14                       ` Qing Zhao
2023-06-16 16:21                       ` Joseph Myers
2023-06-16 17:07                         ` Martin Uecker
2023-06-16 20:20                           ` Qing Zhao
2023-06-16 21:35                             ` Joseph Myers
2023-06-20 19:40                               ` Qing Zhao
2023-06-27 15:44                                 ` Qing Zhao
2023-05-25 16:14 ` [V1][PATCH 2/3] Use the element_count atribute info in builtin object size [PR108896] Qing Zhao
2023-05-27 10:20   ` Martin Uecker
2023-05-30 16:08     ` Qing Zhao
2023-05-25 16:14 ` [V1][PATCH 3/3] Use the element_count attribute information in bound sanitizer[PR108896] Qing Zhao
2023-05-26 16:12 ` [V1][PATCH 0/3] New attribute "element_count" to annotate bounds for C99 FAM(PR108896) Kees Cook
2023-05-30 21:44   ` Qing Zhao [this message]
2023-05-26 20:40 ` Kees Cook
2023-05-30 15:43   ` Qing Zhao
2023-07-06 18:56   ` Qing Zhao
2023-07-06 21:10     ` Martin Uecker
2023-07-07 15:47       ` Qing Zhao
2023-07-07 20:21         ` Qing Zhao
2023-07-13 20:31     ` Kees Cook
2023-07-17 21:17       ` Qing Zhao
2023-07-17 23:40         ` Kees Cook
2023-07-18 15:37           ` Qing Zhao
2023-07-18 16:03             ` Martin Uecker
2023-07-18 16:25               ` Qing Zhao
2023-07-18 16:50                 ` Martin Uecker
2023-07-18 18:53             ` Qing Zhao
2023-07-19  8:41           ` Martin Uecker
2023-07-19 16:16           ` Qing Zhao
2023-07-19 18:52           ` Qing Zhao
2023-07-31 20:14             ` Qing Zhao
2023-08-01 22:45               ` Kees Cook
2023-08-02  6:25                 ` Martin Uecker
2023-08-02 15:02                   ` Qing Zhao
2023-08-02 15:09                 ` Qing Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2AA83C79-2EA4-4ACB-A3F6-F55C24A8EDF9@oracle.com \
    --to=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=isanbard@gmail.com \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
    --cc=uecker@tugraz.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).