* [PATCH] c++: Fix up mangling of static lambdas [PR108525]
@ 2023-01-24 23:19 Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-25 14:08 ` Jason Merrill
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2023-01-24 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Merrill; +Cc: gcc-patches
Hi!
Before the P1169R4 changes, operator () of a lambda was
always a method, so it was fine to pass method_p = 1 unconditionally,
but it isn't always the case, so this patch adds a check for whether
it is a method or nor.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2023-01-25 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/108525
* mangle.cc (write_closure_type_name): Don't assume all
lambda operator() fns are methods.
* g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call5.C: New test.
--- gcc/cp/mangle.cc.jj 2023-01-16 11:52:16.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/mangle.cc 2023-01-24 18:59:09.335156301 +0100
@@ -1816,7 +1816,7 @@ write_closure_type_name (const tree type
if (abi_warn_or_compat_version_crosses (18))
G.need_abi_warning = true;
- write_method_parms (parms, /*method_p=*/1, fn);
+ write_method_parms (parms, TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (fn)) == METHOD_TYPE, fn);
write_char ('E');
if ((LAMBDA_EXPR_SCOPE_SIG_DISCRIMINATOR (lambda)
!= LAMBDA_EXPR_SCOPE_ONLY_DISCRIMINATOR (lambda))
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call5.C.jj 2023-01-24 19:03:21.770469929 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call5.C 2023-01-24 19:02:45.224003615 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// PR c++/108525
+// { dg-do compile { target c++23 } }
+
+auto b = [](...) static { return 1; };
+auto foo () { return b (); }
Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] c++: Fix up mangling of static lambdas [PR108525]
2023-01-24 23:19 [PATCH] c++: Fix up mangling of static lambdas [PR108525] Jakub Jelinek
@ 2023-01-25 14:08 ` Jason Merrill
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jason Merrill @ 2023-01-25 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: gcc-patches
On 1/24/23 18:19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Before the P1169R4 changes, operator () of a lambda was
> always a method, so it was fine to pass method_p = 1 unconditionally,
> but it isn't always the case, so this patch adds a check for whether
> it is a method or nor.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
OK.
> 2023-01-25 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR c++/108525
> * mangle.cc (write_closure_type_name): Don't assume all
> lambda operator() fns are methods.
>
> * g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call5.C: New test.
>
> --- gcc/cp/mangle.cc.jj 2023-01-16 11:52:16.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/cp/mangle.cc 2023-01-24 18:59:09.335156301 +0100
> @@ -1816,7 +1816,7 @@ write_closure_type_name (const tree type
> if (abi_warn_or_compat_version_crosses (18))
> G.need_abi_warning = true;
>
> - write_method_parms (parms, /*method_p=*/1, fn);
> + write_method_parms (parms, TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (fn)) == METHOD_TYPE, fn);
> write_char ('E');
> if ((LAMBDA_EXPR_SCOPE_SIG_DISCRIMINATOR (lambda)
> != LAMBDA_EXPR_SCOPE_ONLY_DISCRIMINATOR (lambda))
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call5.C.jj 2023-01-24 19:03:21.770469929 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call5.C 2023-01-24 19:02:45.224003615 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> +// PR c++/108525
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++23 } }
> +
> +auto b = [](...) static { return 1; };
> +auto foo () { return b (); }
>
> Jakub
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-25 14:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-24 23:19 [PATCH] c++: Fix up mangling of static lambdas [PR108525] Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-25 14:08 ` Jason Merrill
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).