public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com>
To: Richard Earnshaw via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@arm.com>,
	richard.sandiford@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aarch64: Fix test_dfp_17.c for big-endian [PR 107604]
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:33:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f19640b-6900-5062-472f-5896f55bc6f7@foss.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mpta64j9quj.fsf@arm.com>



On 22/11/2022 11:21, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Earnshaw via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>> On 22/11/2022 09:01, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/test_dfp_17.c has been failing on
>>> big-endian, because the _Decimal32 on-stack argument is not padded in
>>> the same direction depending on endianness.
>>>
>>> This patch fixes the testcase so that it expects the argument in the
>>> right stack location, similarly to what other tests do in the same
>>> directory.
>>>
>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> 	PR target/107604
>>> 	* gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/test_dfp_17.c: Fix for big-endian.
>>> ---
>>>    gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/test_dfp_17.c | 4 ++++
>>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/test_dfp_17.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/test_dfp_17.c
>>> index 22dc462bf7c..3c45f715cf7 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/test_dfp_17.c
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/test_dfp_17.c
>>> @@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ struct z b = { 9.0dd, 10.0dd, 11.0dd, 12.0dd };
>>>      ANON(struct z, a, D1)
>>>      ANON(struct z, b, STACK)
>>>      ANON(int , 5, W0)
>>> +#ifndef __AAPCS64_BIG_ENDIAN__
>>>      ANON(_Decimal32, f1, STACK+32) /* Note: no promotion to _Decimal64.  */
>>> +#else
>>> +  ANON(_Decimal32, f1, STACK+36) /* Note: no promotion to _Decimal64.  */
>>> +#endif
>>>      LAST_ANON(_Decimal64, 0.5dd, STACK+40)
>>>    #endif
>>
>> Why would a Decimal32 change stack placement based on the endianness?
>> Isn't it a 4-byte object?
> 
> Yes, but PARM_BOUNDARY (64) sets a minimum alignment for all stack arguments.
> 
> Richard

Ah, OK.

I wonder if we should have a new macro in the tests, something like 
ANON_PADDED to describe this case and that works things out more 
automagically for big-endian.

I notice the new ANON definition is not correctly indented.

R.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-22 11:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-22  9:01 Christophe Lyon
2022-11-22 10:57 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-22 11:09 ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-11-22 11:21   ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-22 11:33     ` Richard Earnshaw [this message]
2022-11-22 13:07       ` Christophe Lyon
2022-11-22 13:09       ` Christophe Lyon
2022-11-22 14:03         ` Richard Earnshaw

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2f19640b-6900-5062-472f-5896f55bc6f7@foss.arm.com \
    --to=richard.earnshaw@foss.arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.lyon@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).