From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
To: Richard Earnshaw via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@arm.com>,
Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aarch64: Fix test_dfp_17.c for big-endian [PR 107604]
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:21:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mpta64j9quj.fsf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c77e8717-0e35-3d96-4a3d-371d90f6e216@foss.arm.com> (Richard Earnshaw via Gcc-patches's message of "Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:09:43 +0000")
Richard Earnshaw via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> On 22/11/2022 09:01, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/test_dfp_17.c has been failing on
>> big-endian, because the _Decimal32 on-stack argument is not padded in
>> the same direction depending on endianness.
>>
>> This patch fixes the testcase so that it expects the argument in the
>> right stack location, similarly to what other tests do in the same
>> directory.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> PR target/107604
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/test_dfp_17.c: Fix for big-endian.
>> ---
>> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/test_dfp_17.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/test_dfp_17.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/test_dfp_17.c
>> index 22dc462bf7c..3c45f715cf7 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/test_dfp_17.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/test_dfp_17.c
>> @@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ struct z b = { 9.0dd, 10.0dd, 11.0dd, 12.0dd };
>> ANON(struct z, a, D1)
>> ANON(struct z, b, STACK)
>> ANON(int , 5, W0)
>> +#ifndef __AAPCS64_BIG_ENDIAN__
>> ANON(_Decimal32, f1, STACK+32) /* Note: no promotion to _Decimal64. */
>> +#else
>> + ANON(_Decimal32, f1, STACK+36) /* Note: no promotion to _Decimal64. */
>> +#endif
>> LAST_ANON(_Decimal64, 0.5dd, STACK+40)
>> #endif
>
> Why would a Decimal32 change stack placement based on the endianness?
> Isn't it a 4-byte object?
Yes, but PARM_BOUNDARY (64) sets a minimum alignment for all stack arguments.
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-22 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-22 9:01 Christophe Lyon
2022-11-22 10:57 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-22 11:09 ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-11-22 11:21 ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2022-11-22 11:33 ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-11-22 13:07 ` Christophe Lyon
2022-11-22 13:09 ` Christophe Lyon
2022-11-22 14:03 ` Richard Earnshaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mpta64j9quj.fsf@arm.com \
--to=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com \
--cc=christophe.lyon@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).