From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Cc: juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
jinma@linux.alibaba.com, Kito.cheng@sifive.com
Subject: Re: FW: [RFC] RISC-V: Support risc-v bfloat16 This patch support bfloat16 in riscv like x86_64 and arm.
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 11:53:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <587e1260-fdeb-ea02-dae4-26fbcb3a37e4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mhng-8d5cd709-d237-486b-b6f0-55a700cc5089@palmer-ri-x1c9>
On 6/1/23 10:56, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Jun 2023 09:48:47 PDT (-0700), jeffreyalaw@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/1/23 01:01, juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai wrote:
>>> I plan to implement BF16 vector in GCC but still waiting for ISA
>>> ratified since GCC policy doesn't allow un-ratified ISA.
>> Right. So those specs need to move along further before we can start
>> integrating code.
>>
>>>
>>> Currently, we are working on INT8,INT16,INT32,INT64,FP16,FP32,FP64
>>> auto-vectorizaiton.
>>> It should very simple BF16 in current vector framework in GCC.
>> In prior architectures I've worked on the bulk of BF16 work was just
>> adding additional entries to existing iterators. So I agree, it should
>> be very simple :-)
>
> We should also have someone who's a bit more plugged in to floating
> point check to make sure the RISC-V bfloat16 semantics match IEEE. I
> don't see any issues, but I'm not really a FP person so I'm not sure.
> There were certainly a lot of subtlies for the other FP bits, so even if
> the implementation just plumbs straight through IMO it's worth checking.
>
> We have one FP person at Rivos, I can try and rope him in if you want?
> Happy to have someone else do it, though, as he's usually pretty busy ;)
I don't really have an FP expert here. I can't honestly pretend to be
one myself.
jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-01 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-07 9:12 Liao Shihua
2023-04-25 13:23 ` Kito Cheng
2023-06-01 6:51 ` Jin Ma
[not found] ` <MW5PR11MB59081DA700F563D0DD24161FA9499@MW5PR11MB5908.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2023-06-01 7:01 ` FW: " juzhe.zhong
2023-06-01 16:48 ` Jeff Law
2023-06-01 16:56 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-06-01 17:53 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2023-06-01 16:59 ` Philipp Tomsich
2023-06-01 9:07 ` Liao Shihua
2023-06-15 7:51 ` Jin Ma
2023-06-15 9:52 ` Jin Ma
2023-06-17 15:31 ` Jeff Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=587e1260-fdeb-ea02-dae4-26fbcb3a37e4@gmail.com \
--to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=Kito.cheng@sifive.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jinma@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).