public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] arm: Revert Auto-vectorization for MVE: add pack/unpack patterns PR target/104882
@ 2022-03-22 14:33 Christophe Lyon
  2022-03-25 10:42 ` Jakub Jelinek
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Lyon @ 2022-03-22 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches

This reverts commit r12-1434-g046a3beb1673bf to fix PR target/104882.

As discussed in the PR, it turns out that the MVE ISA has no natural
mapping with GCC's vec_pack_trunc / vec_unpack standard patterns, unlike
Neon or SVE for instance.

This patch also adds the executable testcase provided in the PR.
This test passes at -O3 because the generated code does not need
to use the pack/unpack patterns, hence the use of -O2 which now
triggers vectorization since a few months ago.

2022-03-18  Christophe Lyon  <christohe.lyon@arm.com>

	PR target/104882
	Revert
	2021-06-11  Christophe Lyon  <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>

	gcc/
	* config/arm/mve.md (mve_vec_unpack<US>_lo_<mode>): Delete.
	(mve_vec_unpack<US>_hi_<mode>): Delete.
	(@mve_vec_pack_trunc_lo_<mode>): Delete.
	(mve_vmovntq_<supf><mode>): Remove '@' prefix.
	* config/arm/neon.md (vec_unpack<US>_hi_<mode>): Move back
	from vec-common.md.
	(vec_unpack<US>_lo_<mode>): Likewise.
	(vec_pack_trunc_<mode>): Rename from
	neon_quad_vec_pack_trunc_<mode>.
	* config/arm/vec-common.md (vec_unpack<US>_hi_<mode>): Delete.
	(vec_unpack<US>_lo_<mode>): Delete.
	(vec_pack_trunc_<mode>): Delete.

	PR target/104882
	gcc/testsuite/
	* gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vclz.c: Update expected results.
	* gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vshl.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vec-pack.c: Delete.
	* gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vec-unpack.c: Delete.
	* gcc.target/arm/simd/pr104882.c: New test.
---
 gcc/config/arm/mve.md                         | 35 +--------
 gcc/config/arm/neon.md                        | 39 +++++++++-
 gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md                  | 71 -------------------
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vclz.c  |  7 +-
 .../gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vec-pack.c        | 26 -------
 .../gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vec-unpack.c      | 29 --------
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vshl.c  |  5 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/pr104882.c  | 16 +++++
 8 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vec-pack.c
 delete mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vec-unpack.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/pr104882.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/mve.md b/gcc/config/arm/mve.md
index 908bedc9254..369d7a79f6c 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/mve.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/mve.md
@@ -535,26 +535,6 @@ (define_insn "mve_vmovlbq_<supf><mode>"
   [(set_attr "type" "mve_move")
 ])
 
-(define_insn "mve_vec_unpack<US>_lo_<mode>"
-  [(set (match_operand:<V_unpack> 0 "register_operand" "=w")
-	(SE:<V_unpack> (vec_select:<V_HALF>
-			  (match_operand:MVE_3 1 "register_operand" "w")
-			  (match_operand:MVE_3 2 "vect_par_constant_low" ""))))]
-  "TARGET_HAVE_MVE"
-  "vmovlb.<US>%#<V_sz_elem> %q0, %q1"
-  [(set_attr "type" "mve_move")]
-)
-
-(define_insn "mve_vec_unpack<US>_hi_<mode>"
-  [(set (match_operand:<V_unpack> 0 "register_operand" "=w")
-	(SE:<V_unpack> (vec_select:<V_HALF>
-			  (match_operand:MVE_3 1 "register_operand" "w")
-			  (match_operand:MVE_3 2 "vect_par_constant_high" ""))))]
-  "TARGET_HAVE_MVE"
-  "vmovlt.<US>%#<V_sz_elem> %q0, %q1"
-  [(set_attr "type" "mve_move")]
-)
-
 ;;
 ;; [vcvtpq_s, vcvtpq_u])
 ;;
@@ -2219,23 +2199,10 @@ (define_insn "mve_vmovnbq_<supf><mode>"
   [(set_attr "type" "mve_move")
 ])
 
-;; vmovnb pattern used by the vec_pack_trunc expander to avoid the
-;; need for an uninitialized input operand.
-(define_insn "@mve_vec_pack_trunc_lo_<mode>"
-  [
-   (set (match_operand:<V_narrow_pack> 0 "s_register_operand" "=w")
-	(unspec:<V_narrow_pack> [(match_operand:MVE_5 1 "s_register_operand" "w")]
-	 VMOVNBQ_S))
-  ]
-  "TARGET_HAVE_MVE"
-  "vmovnb.i%#<V_sz_elem>	%q0, %q1"
-  [(set_attr "type" "mve_move")
-])
-
 ;;
 ;; [vmovntq_s, vmovntq_u])
 ;;
-(define_insn "@mve_vmovntq_<supf><mode>"
+(define_insn "mve_vmovntq_<supf><mode>"
   [
    (set (match_operand:<V_narrow_pack> 0 "s_register_operand" "=w")
 	(unspec:<V_narrow_pack> [(match_operand:<V_narrow_pack> 1 "s_register_operand" "0")
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/neon.md b/gcc/config/arm/neon.md
index f270ded4978..275bcc1435e 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/neon.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/neon.md
@@ -6005,6 +6005,43 @@ (define_insn "neon_vec_unpack<US>_hi_<mode>"
   [(set_attr "type" "neon_shift_imm_long")]
 )
 
+(define_expand "vec_unpack<US>_hi_<mode>"
+  [(match_operand:<V_unpack> 0 "register_operand")
+   (SE:<V_unpack> (match_operand:VU 1 "register_operand"))]
+ "TARGET_NEON && !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN"
+  {
+   rtvec v = rtvec_alloc (<V_mode_nunits>/2)  ;
+   rtx t1;
+   int i;
+   for (i = 0; i < (<V_mode_nunits>/2); i++)
+     RTVEC_ELT (v, i) = GEN_INT ((<V_mode_nunits>/2) + i);
+  
+   t1 = gen_rtx_PARALLEL (<MODE>mode, v);
+   emit_insn (gen_neon_vec_unpack<US>_hi_<mode> (operands[0], 
+                                                 operands[1], 
+					         t1));
+   DONE;
+  }
+)
+
+(define_expand "vec_unpack<US>_lo_<mode>"
+  [(match_operand:<V_unpack> 0 "register_operand")
+   (SE:<V_unpack> (match_operand:VU 1 "register_operand"))]
+ "TARGET_NEON && !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN"
+  {
+   rtvec v = rtvec_alloc (<V_mode_nunits>/2)  ;
+   rtx t1;
+   int i;
+   for (i = 0; i < (<V_mode_nunits>/2) ; i++)
+     RTVEC_ELT (v, i) = GEN_INT (i);
+   t1 = gen_rtx_PARALLEL (<MODE>mode, v);
+   emit_insn (gen_neon_vec_unpack<US>_lo_<mode> (operands[0], 
+                                                 operands[1], 
+				   	         t1));
+   DONE;
+  }
+)
+
 (define_insn "neon_vec_<US>mult_lo_<mode>"
  [(set (match_operand:<V_unpack> 0 "register_operand" "=w")
        (mult:<V_unpack> (SE:<V_unpack> (vec_select:<V_HALF>
@@ -6220,7 +6257,7 @@ (define_expand "vec_widen_<US>shiftl_lo_<mode>"
 ; because the ordering of vector elements in Q registers is different from what
 ; the semantics of the instructions require.
 
-(define_insn "neon_quad_vec_pack_trunc_<mode>"
+(define_insn "vec_pack_trunc_<mode>"
  [(set (match_operand:<V_narrow_pack> 0 "register_operand" "=&w")
        (vec_concat:<V_narrow_pack> 
 		(truncate:<V_narrow> 
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md b/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md
index f13009090af..fd878cba22d 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md
@@ -580,77 +580,6 @@ (define_expand "clz<mode>2"
   "ARM_HAVE_<MODE>_ARITH
    && !TARGET_REALLY_IWMMXT"
 )
-
-;; vmovl[tb] are not available for V4SI on MVE
-(define_expand "vec_unpack<US>_hi_<mode>"
-  [(set (match_operand:<V_unpack> 0 "register_operand")
-	(SE:<V_unpack> (vec_select:<V_HALF>
-			 (match_operand:VU 1 "register_operand")
-			 (match_dup 2))))]
- "ARM_HAVE_<MODE>_ARITH
-  && !TARGET_REALLY_IWMMXT
-  && ! (<MODE>mode == V4SImode && TARGET_HAVE_MVE)
-  && !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN"
-  {
-    rtvec v = rtvec_alloc (<V_mode_nunits>/2);
-    int i;
-    for (i = 0; i < (<V_mode_nunits>/2); i++)
-      RTVEC_ELT (v, i) = GEN_INT ((<V_mode_nunits>/2) + i);
-
-    operands[2] = gen_rtx_PARALLEL (<MODE>mode, v);
-  }
-)
-
-;; vmovl[tb] are not available for V4SI on MVE
-(define_expand "vec_unpack<US>_lo_<mode>"
-  [(set (match_operand:<V_unpack> 0 "register_operand")
-	(SE:<V_unpack> (vec_select:<V_HALF>
-			 (match_operand:VU 1 "register_operand")
-			 (match_dup 2))))]
- "ARM_HAVE_<MODE>_ARITH
-  && !TARGET_REALLY_IWMMXT
-  && ! (<MODE>mode == V4SImode && TARGET_HAVE_MVE)
-  && !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN"
-  {
-    rtvec v = rtvec_alloc (<V_mode_nunits>/2);
-    int i;
-    for (i = 0; i < (<V_mode_nunits>/2) ; i++)
-      RTVEC_ELT (v, i) = GEN_INT (i);
-
-    operands[2] = gen_rtx_PARALLEL (<MODE>mode, v);
-
-  }
-)
-
-;; vmovn[tb] are not available for V2DI on MVE
-(define_expand "vec_pack_trunc_<mode>"
- [(set (match_operand:<V_narrow_pack> 0 "register_operand")
-       (vec_concat:<V_narrow_pack>
-		(truncate:<V_narrow>
-			(match_operand:VN 1 "register_operand"))
-		(truncate:<V_narrow>
-			(match_operand:VN 2 "register_operand"))))]
- "ARM_HAVE_<MODE>_ARITH
-  && !TARGET_REALLY_IWMMXT
-  && ! (<MODE>mode == V2DImode && TARGET_HAVE_MVE)
-  && !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN"
- {
-   if (TARGET_NEON)
-     {
-       emit_insn (gen_neon_quad_vec_pack_trunc_<mode> (operands[0], operands[1],
-						       operands[2]));
-     }
-   else
-     {
-       rtx tmpreg = gen_reg_rtx (<V_narrow_pack>mode);
-       emit_insn (gen_mve_vec_pack_trunc_lo (<MODE>mode, tmpreg, operands[1]));
-       emit_insn (gen_mve_vmovntq (VMOVNTQ_S, <MODE>mode,
-				   operands[0], tmpreg, operands[2]));
-     }
-   DONE;
- }
-)
-
 (define_expand "vec_init<mode><V_elem_l>"
   [(match_operand:VDQX 0 "s_register_operand")
    (match_operand 1 "" "")]
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vclz.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vclz.c
index 5d6e991cfc6..7068736bc28 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vclz.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vclz.c
@@ -21,9 +21,8 @@ FUNC(u, uint, 16, clz)
 FUNC(s, int, 8, clz)
 FUNC(u, uint, 8, clz)
 
-/* 16 and 8-bit versions still use 32-bit intermediate temporaries, so for
-   instance instead of using vclz.i8, we need 4 vclz.i32, leading to a total of
-   14 vclz.i32 expected in this testcase.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vclz\.i32  q[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 14 } } */
+/* 16 and 8-bit versions are not vectorized because they need pack/unpack
+   patterns since __builtin_clz uses 32-bit parameter and return value.  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vclz\.i32  q[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 2 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vclz\.i16  q[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 2 { xfail *-*-* } } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vclz\.i8  q[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 2 { xfail *-*-* } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vec-pack.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vec-pack.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 43642b2fec5..00000000000
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vec-pack.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
-/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_1m_mve_ok } */
-/* { dg-add-options arm_v8_1m_mve } */
-/* { dg-additional-options "-O3" } */
-
-#include <stdint.h>
-
-#define FUNC(SIGN, TYPE, DSTBITS, BITS, NAME)				\
-  void test_ ## NAME ##_ ## SIGN ## BITS (TYPE##DSTBITS##_t * __restrict__ dest, \
-					  TYPE##BITS##_t *a) {		\
-    int i;								\
-    for (i=0; i < (256 / BITS); i++) {					\
-      dest[i] = a[i];							\
-    }									\
-  }
-
-FUNC(s, int, 16, 32, pack)
-FUNC(u, uint, 16, 32, pack)
-FUNC(s, int, 8, 16, pack)
-FUNC(u, uint, 8, 16, pack)
-
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vmovnt\.i32\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 2 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vmovnb\.i32\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 2 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vmovnt\.i16\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 2 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vmovnb\.i16\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 2 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {vldr\.64\td[0-9]+, \.L} } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vec-unpack.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vec-unpack.c
deleted file mode 100644
index cdc62f854ad..00000000000
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vec-unpack.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
-/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_1m_mve_ok } */
-/* { dg-add-options arm_v8_1m_mve } */
-/* { dg-additional-options "-O3" } */
-
-#include <stdint.h>
-
-#define FUNC(SIGN, TYPE, DSTBITS, BITS, NAME)				\
-  void test_ ## NAME ##_ ## SIGN ## BITS (TYPE##DSTBITS##_t * __restrict__ dest, \
-					  TYPE##BITS##_t *a) {		\
-    int i;								\
-    for (i=0; i < (128 / BITS); i++) {					\
-      dest[i] = a[i];							\
-    }									\
-  }
-
-FUNC(s, int, 32, 16, unpack)
-FUNC(u, uint, 32, 16, unpack)
-FUNC(s, int, 16, 8, unpack)
-FUNC(u, uint, 16, 8, unpack)
-
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vmovlt\.s16 q[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 1 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vmovlb\.s16 q[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 1 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vmovlt\.u16 q[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 1 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vmovlb\.u16 q[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 1 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vmovlt\.s8 q[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 1 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vmovlb\.s8 q[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 1 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vmovlt\.u8 q[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 1 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vmovlb\.u8 q[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vshl.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vshl.c
index 91dd942d818..7a0644997c8 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vshl.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vshl.c
@@ -56,10 +56,7 @@ FUNC_IMM(u, uint, 8, 16, <<, vshlimm)
 /* MVE has only 128-bit vectors, so we can vectorize only half of the
    functions above.  */
 /* We only emit vshl.u, which is equivalent to vshl.s anyway.  */
-/* 16 and 8-bit versions still use 32-bit intermediate temporaries, so for
-   instance instead of using vshl.u8, we need 4 vshl.i32, leading to a total of
-   14 vshl.i32 expected in this testcase.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vshl.u[0-9]+\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 14 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vshl.u[0-9]+\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 2 } } */
 
 /* We emit vshl.i when the shift amount is an immediate.  */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vshl.i[0-9]+\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9]+} 6 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/pr104882.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/pr104882.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ae9709af42f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/pr104882.c
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_1m_mve_ok } */
+/* { dg-add-options arm_v8_1m_mve } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-O2" } */
+
+int i;
+char src[1072];
+char dst[72];
+int main() {
+  for (i = 0; i < 128; i++)
+    src[i] = i;
+  __builtin_memcpy(dst, src, 7);
+  for (i = 0; i < 7; i++)
+    if (dst[i] != i)
+      __builtin_abort();
+}
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] arm: Revert Auto-vectorization for MVE: add pack/unpack patterns PR target/104882
  2022-03-22 14:33 [PATCH] arm: Revert Auto-vectorization for MVE: add pack/unpack patterns PR target/104882 Christophe Lyon
@ 2022-03-25 10:42 ` Jakub Jelinek
  2022-03-25 17:29   ` Christophe Lyon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2022-03-25 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe Lyon; +Cc: gcc-patches

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 03:33:44PM +0100, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote:
> This reverts commit r12-1434-g046a3beb1673bf to fix PR target/104882.
> 
> As discussed in the PR, it turns out that the MVE ISA has no natural
> mapping with GCC's vec_pack_trunc / vec_unpack standard patterns, unlike
> Neon or SVE for instance.
> 
> This patch also adds the executable testcase provided in the PR.
> This test passes at -O3 because the generated code does not need
> to use the pack/unpack patterns, hence the use of -O2 which now
> triggers vectorization since a few months ago.

For reverting your own patches you don't need to wait for approval:
https://gcc.gnu.org/gitwrite.html
"Similarly, no outside approval is needed to revert a patch that you checked in."

The new test LGTM.

> 2022-03-18  Christophe Lyon  <christohe.lyon@arm.com>
> 
> 	PR target/104882
> 	Revert
> 	2021-06-11  Christophe Lyon  <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
> 
> 	gcc/
> 	* config/arm/mve.md (mve_vec_unpack<US>_lo_<mode>): Delete.
> 	(mve_vec_unpack<US>_hi_<mode>): Delete.
> 	(@mve_vec_pack_trunc_lo_<mode>): Delete.
> 	(mve_vmovntq_<supf><mode>): Remove '@' prefix.
> 	* config/arm/neon.md (vec_unpack<US>_hi_<mode>): Move back
> 	from vec-common.md.
> 	(vec_unpack<US>_lo_<mode>): Likewise.
> 	(vec_pack_trunc_<mode>): Rename from
> 	neon_quad_vec_pack_trunc_<mode>.
> 	* config/arm/vec-common.md (vec_unpack<US>_hi_<mode>): Delete.
> 	(vec_unpack<US>_lo_<mode>): Delete.
> 	(vec_pack_trunc_<mode>): Delete.
> 
> 	PR target/104882
> 	gcc/testsuite/
> 	* gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vclz.c: Update expected results.
> 	* gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vshl.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vec-pack.c: Delete.
> 	* gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vec-unpack.c: Delete.
> 	* gcc.target/arm/simd/pr104882.c: New test.

	Jakub


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] arm: Revert Auto-vectorization for MVE: add pack/unpack patterns PR target/104882
  2022-03-25 10:42 ` Jakub Jelinek
@ 2022-03-25 17:29   ` Christophe Lyon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Lyon @ 2022-03-25 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: gcc-patches



On 3/25/22 11:42, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 03:33:44PM +0100, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> This reverts commit r12-1434-g046a3beb1673bf to fix PR target/104882.
>>
>> As discussed in the PR, it turns out that the MVE ISA has no natural
>> mapping with GCC's vec_pack_trunc / vec_unpack standard patterns, unlike
>> Neon or SVE for instance.
>>
>> This patch also adds the executable testcase provided in the PR.
>> This test passes at -O3 because the generated code does not need
>> to use the pack/unpack patterns, hence the use of -O2 which now
>> triggers vectorization since a few months ago.
> 
> For reverting your own patches you don't need to wait for approval:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/gitwrite.html
> "Similarly, no outside approval is needed to revert a patch that you checked in."
> 
> The new test LGTM.

Thanks, just pushed as r12-7414-g1027dc45920489.

Christophe

> 
>> 2022-03-18  Christophe Lyon  <christohe.lyon@arm.com>
>>
>> 	PR target/104882
>> 	Revert
>> 	2021-06-11  Christophe Lyon  <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
>>
>> 	gcc/
>> 	* config/arm/mve.md (mve_vec_unpack<US>_lo_<mode>): Delete.
>> 	(mve_vec_unpack<US>_hi_<mode>): Delete.
>> 	(@mve_vec_pack_trunc_lo_<mode>): Delete.
>> 	(mve_vmovntq_<supf><mode>): Remove '@' prefix.
>> 	* config/arm/neon.md (vec_unpack<US>_hi_<mode>): Move back
>> 	from vec-common.md.
>> 	(vec_unpack<US>_lo_<mode>): Likewise.
>> 	(vec_pack_trunc_<mode>): Rename from
>> 	neon_quad_vec_pack_trunc_<mode>.
>> 	* config/arm/vec-common.md (vec_unpack<US>_hi_<mode>): Delete.
>> 	(vec_unpack<US>_lo_<mode>): Delete.
>> 	(vec_pack_trunc_<mode>): Delete.
>>
>> 	PR target/104882
>> 	gcc/testsuite/
>> 	* gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vclz.c: Update expected results.
>> 	* gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vshl.c: Likewise.
>> 	* gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vec-pack.c: Delete.
>> 	* gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vec-unpack.c: Delete.
>> 	* gcc.target/arm/simd/pr104882.c: New test.
> 
> 	Jakub
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-03-25 17:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-22 14:33 [PATCH] arm: Revert Auto-vectorization for MVE: add pack/unpack patterns PR target/104882 Christophe Lyon
2022-03-25 10:42 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-03-25 17:29   ` Christophe Lyon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).