public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++, v2: Fix up mangling ICE with void{} [PR106863]
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 10:45:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65f645a9-5930-0752-0d1d-10e0aa8b47ad@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y1FdaWQjQMbkJ3rB@tucnak>

On 10/20/22 10:38, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:19:59AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> I think in a template we want the same early-return behavior as in the
>> processing_template_decl block farther down in the function: specifically,
>> we want to return a CONSTRUCTOR (for which COMPOUND_LITERAL_P is true), so
>> it mangles as void{} rather than void().
> 
> So like this then?
> 
> 2022-10-20  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
> 
> 	PR c++/106863
> 	* semantics.cc (finish_compound_literal): For void{}, if
> 	processing_template_decl return a COMPOUND_LITERAL_P
> 	CONSTRUCTOR rather than void_node.
> 
> 	* g++.dg/cpp0x/dr2351-2.C: New test.
> 
> --- gcc/cp/semantics.cc.jj	2022-10-19 01:14:58.343483355 +0200
> +++ gcc/cp/semantics.cc	2022-10-20 16:32:30.605571968 +0200
> @@ -3164,7 +3164,16 @@ finish_compound_literal (tree type, tree
>       {
>         /* DR2351 */
>         if (VOID_TYPE_P (type) && CONSTRUCTOR_NELTS (compound_literal) == 0)
> -	return void_node;
> +	{
> +	  if (!processing_template_decl)
> +	    return void_node;
> +	  TREE_TYPE (compound_literal) = type;
> +	  TREE_HAS_CONSTRUCTOR (compound_literal) = 1;
> +	  CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DEPENDENT (compound_literal) = 0;
> +	  if (fcl_context == fcl_c99)
> +	    CONSTRUCTOR_C99_COMPOUND_LITERAL (compound_literal) = 1;

I don't think it's possible to get here with the C compound literal 
syntax, so you can drop these two lines.  OK with that change.

> +	  return compound_literal;
> +	}
>         else if (VOID_TYPE_P (type)
>   	       && processing_template_decl
>   	       && maybe_zero_constructor_nelts (compound_literal))
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/dr2351-2.C.jj	2022-10-20 16:27:19.645821706 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/dr2351-2.C	2022-10-20 16:27:19.645821706 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +// DR2351
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +
> +void bar (int);
> +
> +template <typename T>
> +auto foo (T t) -> decltype (bar (t), void{})
> +{
> +  return bar (t);
> +}
> +
> +int
> +main ()
> +{
> +  foo (0);
> +}
> 
> 
> 	Jakub
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2022-10-20 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-19  8:00 [PATCH] c++: " Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-20 14:19 ` Jason Merrill
2022-10-20 14:38   ` [PATCH] c++, v2: " Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-20 14:45     ` Jason Merrill [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65f645a9-5930-0752-0d1d-10e0aa8b47ad@redhat.com \
    --to=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).