Re: [PATCH] docs: Fix double 'See' in zero-length-bounds docs.

[Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>]

On 11 March 2023 18:33:46 CET, Sean Bright via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>This fixes a minor issue where the zero-length-bound docs read "See See
>Zero Length."
>
>gcc/ChangeLog:
>    * doc/invoke.texi (Warning Options): Remove errant 'See'
>    before @xref.
>---
> gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
>index 3a6a97862b0..174d160dd6c 100644
>--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
>+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
>@@ -8345,7 +8345,7 @@ conversions the warnings @option{-Wno-int-to-pointer-cast} and
> @item -Wzero-length-bounds
> Warn about accesses to elements of zero-length array members that might
> overlap other members of the same object.  Declaring interior zero-length
>-arrays is discouraged because accesses to them are undefined.  See
>+arrays is discouraged because accesses to them are undefined.
> @xref{Zero Length}.


I'm not a native speaker, but wouldn't it be better to talk about singular access, i.e. s/accesses/access/ in both cases?

thanks,