From: chenglulu <chenglulu@loongson.cn>
To: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: i@xen0n.name, xuchenghua@loongson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] LoongArch: Optimize immediate load.
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 10:12:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a16b95e-3622-5c51-bb23-2885611f86ca@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32b7624b24d1f48805d4c777ebde1380fd3d1596.camel@xry111.site>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2082 bytes --]
在 2022/11/23 00:44, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
>> While I still can't fully understand the immediate load issue and how
>> this patch fix it, I've tested this patch (alongside the prefetch
>> instruction patch) with bootstrap-ubsan. And the compiled result of
>> imm-load1.c seems OK.
> And it's doing correct thing for Glibc "improved generic string
> functions" patch, producing some really tight loop now.
>
In the process of debugging, I found this,bringing the immediate number
load instruction out of the loop is done in loop2_invariant optimization.
One of the conditions for extraction is that the destination register
cannot be used more than once, and the sequence before it was modified
was like this:
(insn 12 11 13 3 (set (reg:DI 90)
(const_int 16842752 [0x1010000])) "test.c":13:12 discrim 1 131
{*movdi_64bit}
(nil))
(insn 13 12 14 3 (set (reg:DI 91)
(ior:DI (reg:DI 90)
(const_int 257 [0x101]))) "test.c":13:12 discrim 1 88 {iordi3}
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:DI 90)
(expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const_int 16843009 [0x1010101])
(nil))))
(insn 14 13 15 3 (set (reg:DI 91)
(ior:DI (zero_extend:DI (subreg:SI (reg:DI 91) 0))
(const_int 282578783305728 [0x1010100000000])))
"test.c":13:12 discrim 1 150 {lu32i_d}
(expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const_int 282578800148737 [0x1010101010101])
(nil)))
(insn 15 14 17 3 (set (reg:DI 91)
(ior:DI (and:DI (reg:DI 91)
(const_int 4503599627370495 [0xfffffffffffff]))
(const_int 72057594037927936 [0x100000000000000])))
"test.c":13:12 discrim 1 151 {lu52i_d}
(expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const_int 72340172838076673 [0x101010101010101])
(nil)))
Therefore, the last two instructions do not meet the extraction conditions.
But because of the implementation of our instructions, I freed myself up
immediately to do it loop2_invariant later, so I avoided this problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-23 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-17 9:59 Lulu Cheng
2022-11-22 14:03 ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-11-22 16:44 ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-11-23 2:12 ` chenglulu [this message]
2022-11-28 2:46 ` [pushed][PATCH " Lulu Cheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6a16b95e-3622-5c51-bb23-2885611f86ca@loongson.cn \
--to=chenglulu@loongson.cn \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=i@xen0n.name \
--cc=xry111@xry111.site \
--cc=xuchenghua@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).