public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
To: Nathaniel Shead <nathanieloshead@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++: Check if allocation functions are xobj members [PR114078]
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 22:59:15 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7557fd6d-964a-ce4e-3051-62c070fe5be6@idea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66237f55.170a0220.88a25.0553@mx.google.com>

On Sat, 20 Apr 2024, Nathaniel Shead wrote:

> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk?
> 
> -- >8 --
> 
> A class allocation member function is implicitly 'static' by
> [class.free] p3, so cannot have an explicit object parameter.
> 
> 	PR c++/114078
> 
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* decl.cc (grokdeclarator): Check allocation functions for xobj
> 	parameters.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* g++.dg/cpp23/explicit-obj-ops-alloc.C: New test.

LGTM

> 
> Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Shead <nathanieloshead@gmail.com>
> ---
>  gcc/cp/decl.cc                                      |  6 ++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/explicit-obj-ops-alloc.C | 11 +++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/explicit-obj-ops-alloc.C
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> index 65ab64885ff..2af026d255d 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> @@ -13728,6 +13728,12 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *declarator,
>  			inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (xobj_parm),
>  				"explicit object parameter declared here");
>  		      }
> +		    if (unqualified_id
> +			&& identifier_p (unqualified_id)
> +			&& IDENTIFIER_NEWDEL_OP_P (unqualified_id))
> +		      error_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (xobj_parm),
> +				"%qD cannot be an explicit object member "
> +				"function", unqualified_id);
>  		  }
>  	      }
>  	    tree pushed_scope = NULL_TREE;
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/explicit-obj-ops-alloc.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/explicit-obj-ops-alloc.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..8a277db7ef5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/explicit-obj-ops-alloc.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +// PR c++/114078
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++23 } }
> +
> +using size_t = decltype(sizeof(0));
> +
> +struct S {
> +  void* operator new(this size_t);  // { dg-error "explicit object" }
> +  void* operator new[](this size_t);  // { dg-error "explicit object" }
> +  void operator delete(this void*);  // { dg-error "explicit object" }
> +  void operator delete[](this void*);  // { dg-error "explicit object" }
> +};
> -- 
> 2.43.2
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-22  2:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-20  8:39 Nathaniel Shead
2024-04-22  2:59 ` Patrick Palka [this message]
2024-04-23  3:15   ` Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7557fd6d-964a-ce4e-3051-62c070fe5be6@idea \
    --to=ppalka@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=nathanieloshead@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).