From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c, c++: Fix up excess precision handling of scalar_to_vector conversion [PR107358]
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:03:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7deca6ca-8689-3765-99b8-c5eacff81bc5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y1Y8dfwmYoaac6EW@tucnak>
On 10/24/22 03:19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As mentioned earlier in the C++ excess precision support mail, the following
> testcase is broken with excess precision both in C and C++ (though just in C++
> it was triggered in real-world code).
> scalar_to_vector is called in both FEs after the excess precision promotions
> (or stripping of EXCESS_PRECISION_EXPR), so we can then get invalid
> diagnostics that say float vector + float involves truncation (on ia32
> from long double to float).
>
> The following patch fixes that by calling scalar_to_vector on the operands
> before the excess precision promotions, let scalar_to_vector just do the
> diagnostics (it does e.g. fold_for_warn so it will fold
> EXCESS_PRECISION_EXPR around REAL_CST to constants etc.) but will then
> do the actual conversions using the excess precision promoted operands
> (so say if we have vector double + (float + float) we don't actually do
> vector double + (float) ((long double) float + (long double) float)
> but
> vector double + (double) ((long double) float + (long double) float)
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
OK on Wednesday if Joseph doesn't object.
> 2022-10-24 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR c++/107358
> c/
> * c-typeck.cc (build_binary_op): Pass operands before excess precision
> promotions to scalar_to_vector call.
> cp/
> * typeck.cc (cp_build_binary_op): Pass operands before excess precision
> promotions to scalar_to_vector call.
> testsuite/
> * c-c++-common/pr107358.c: New test.
> * g++.dg/cpp1y/pr68180.C: Remove -fexcess-precision=fast from
> dg-options.
>
> --- gcc/c/c-typeck.cc.jj 2022-10-14 09:35:56.199990261 +0200
> +++ gcc/c/c-typeck.cc 2022-10-22 17:54:24.378839301 +0200
> @@ -11995,8 +11995,8 @@ build_binary_op (location_t location, en
> if ((gnu_vector_type_p (type0) && code1 != VECTOR_TYPE)
> || (gnu_vector_type_p (type1) && code0 != VECTOR_TYPE))
> {
> - enum stv_conv convert_flag = scalar_to_vector (location, code, op0, op1,
> - true);
> + enum stv_conv convert_flag = scalar_to_vector (location, code, orig_op0,
> + orig_op1, true);
>
> switch (convert_flag)
> {
> --- gcc/cp/typeck.cc.jj 2022-10-20 13:54:22.535670240 +0200
> +++ gcc/cp/typeck.cc 2022-10-22 17:56:58.589715301 +0200
> @@ -5191,6 +5191,8 @@ cp_build_binary_op (const op_location_t
>
> orig_type0 = type0 = TREE_TYPE (op0);
> orig_type1 = type1 = TREE_TYPE (op1);
> + tree non_ep_op0 = op0;
> + tree non_ep_op1 = op1;
>
> /* The expression codes of the data types of the arguments tell us
> whether the arguments are integers, floating, pointers, etc. */
> @@ -5303,8 +5305,9 @@ cp_build_binary_op (const op_location_t
> if ((gnu_vector_type_p (type0) && code1 != VECTOR_TYPE)
> || (gnu_vector_type_p (type1) && code0 != VECTOR_TYPE))
> {
> - enum stv_conv convert_flag = scalar_to_vector (location, code, op0, op1,
> - complain & tf_error);
> + enum stv_conv convert_flag
> + = scalar_to_vector (location, code, non_ep_op0, non_ep_op1,
> + complain & tf_error);
>
> switch (convert_flag)
> {
> --- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr107358.c.jj 2022-10-22 18:46:59.390375310 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr107358.c 2022-10-22 18:01:52.973660719 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> +/* PR c++/107358 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fexcess-precision=standard" } */
> +
> +typedef float __attribute__((vector_size (4 * sizeof (float)))) A;
> +typedef double __attribute__((vector_size (2 * sizeof (double)))) B;
> +
> +void
> +foo (A *x)
> +{
> + *x = *x - 124.225514990f;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +bar (A *x, float y)
> +{
> + *x = *x - y;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +baz (B *x)
> +{
> + *x = *x + 124.225514990f;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +qux (B *x, double y)
> +{
> + *x = *x + y;
> +}
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/pr68180.C.jj 2022-10-14 09:28:28.339159477 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/pr68180.C 2022-10-22 17:59:07.012946513 +0200
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> // PR c++/68180
> // { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
> -// { dg-additional-options "-Wno-psabi -fexcess-precision=fast" }
> +// { dg-additional-options "-Wno-psabi" }
>
> typedef float __attribute__( ( vector_size( 16 ) ) ) float32x4_t;
> constexpr float32x4_t fill(float x) {
>
> Jakub
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-24 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-24 7:19 Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-24 15:23 ` Jeff Law
2022-10-24 20:03 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7deca6ca-8689-3765-99b8-c5eacff81bc5@redhat.com \
--to=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).