public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
	Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] c, c++: Fix up excess precision handling of scalar_to_vector conversion [PR107358]
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 09:19:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1Y8dfwmYoaac6EW@tucnak> (raw)

Hi!

As mentioned earlier in the C++ excess precision support mail, the following
testcase is broken with excess precision both in C and C++ (though just in C++
it was triggered in real-world code).
scalar_to_vector is called in both FEs after the excess precision promotions
(or stripping of EXCESS_PRECISION_EXPR), so we can then get invalid
diagnostics that say float vector + float involves truncation (on ia32
from long double to float).

The following patch fixes that by calling scalar_to_vector on the operands
before the excess precision promotions, let scalar_to_vector just do the
diagnostics (it does e.g. fold_for_warn so it will fold
EXCESS_PRECISION_EXPR around REAL_CST to constants etc.) but will then
do the actual conversions using the excess precision promoted operands
(so say if we have vector double + (float + float) we don't actually do
vector double + (float) ((long double) float + (long double) float)
but
vector double + (double) ((long double) float + (long double) float)

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2022-10-24  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR c++/107358
c/
	* c-typeck.cc (build_binary_op): Pass operands before excess precision
	promotions to scalar_to_vector call.
cp/
	* typeck.cc (cp_build_binary_op): Pass operands before excess precision
	promotions to scalar_to_vector call.
testsuite/
	* c-c++-common/pr107358.c: New test.
	* g++.dg/cpp1y/pr68180.C: Remove -fexcess-precision=fast from
	dg-options.

--- gcc/c/c-typeck.cc.jj	2022-10-14 09:35:56.199990261 +0200
+++ gcc/c/c-typeck.cc	2022-10-22 17:54:24.378839301 +0200
@@ -11995,8 +11995,8 @@ build_binary_op (location_t location, en
   if ((gnu_vector_type_p (type0) && code1 != VECTOR_TYPE)
       || (gnu_vector_type_p (type1) && code0 != VECTOR_TYPE))
     {
-      enum stv_conv convert_flag = scalar_to_vector (location, code, op0, op1,
-						     true);
+      enum stv_conv convert_flag = scalar_to_vector (location, code, orig_op0,
+						     orig_op1, true);
 
       switch (convert_flag)
 	{
--- gcc/cp/typeck.cc.jj	2022-10-20 13:54:22.535670240 +0200
+++ gcc/cp/typeck.cc	2022-10-22 17:56:58.589715301 +0200
@@ -5191,6 +5191,8 @@ cp_build_binary_op (const op_location_t
 
   orig_type0 = type0 = TREE_TYPE (op0);
   orig_type1 = type1 = TREE_TYPE (op1);
+  tree non_ep_op0 = op0;
+  tree non_ep_op1 = op1;
 
   /* The expression codes of the data types of the arguments tell us
      whether the arguments are integers, floating, pointers, etc.  */
@@ -5303,8 +5305,9 @@ cp_build_binary_op (const op_location_t
   if ((gnu_vector_type_p (type0) && code1 != VECTOR_TYPE)
       || (gnu_vector_type_p (type1) && code0 != VECTOR_TYPE))
     {
-      enum stv_conv convert_flag = scalar_to_vector (location, code, op0, op1,
-						     complain & tf_error);
+      enum stv_conv convert_flag
+	= scalar_to_vector (location, code, non_ep_op0, non_ep_op1,
+			    complain & tf_error);
 
       switch (convert_flag)
         {
--- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr107358.c.jj	2022-10-22 18:46:59.390375310 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr107358.c	2022-10-22 18:01:52.973660719 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+/* PR c++/107358 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fexcess-precision=standard" } */
+
+typedef float __attribute__((vector_size (4 * sizeof (float)))) A;
+typedef double __attribute__((vector_size (2 * sizeof (double)))) B;
+
+void
+foo (A *x)
+{
+  *x = *x - 124.225514990f;
+}
+
+void
+bar (A *x, float y)
+{
+  *x = *x - y;
+}
+
+void
+baz (B *x)
+{
+  *x = *x + 124.225514990f;
+}
+
+void
+qux (B *x, double y)
+{
+  *x = *x + y;
+}
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/pr68180.C.jj	2022-10-14 09:28:28.339159477 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/pr68180.C	2022-10-22 17:59:07.012946513 +0200
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 // PR c++/68180
 // { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
-// { dg-additional-options "-Wno-psabi -fexcess-precision=fast" }
+// { dg-additional-options "-Wno-psabi" }
 
 typedef float __attribute__( ( vector_size( 16 ) ) ) float32x4_t;
 constexpr float32x4_t fill(float x) {

	Jakub


             reply	other threads:[~2022-10-24  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-24  7:19 Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2022-10-24 15:23 ` Jeff Law
2022-10-24 20:03 ` Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y1Y8dfwmYoaac6EW@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).