public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>,
	gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add gcc/make-unique.h
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:06:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f2ddb2d-da00-6852-339a-86c7d853087f@palves.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdTfHxM1vkrKopd8k1QccA8JGyvXkSeciTnbRh7t8NL7Yw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2022-07-12 2:45 p.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 14:24, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>
>> On 2022-07-12 1:25 a.m., David Malcolm via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>
>>> I tried adding it to gcc/system.h, but anything that uses it needs to
>>> have std::unique_ptr declared, which meant forcibly including <memory>
>>> from gcc/system.h
>>
>> Did you consider making gcc/system.h include gcc/make-unique.h itself
>> if INCLUDE_MEMORY is defined?  Something like:
>>
>>  #ifdef INCLUDE_MEMORY
>>  # include <memory>
>> + #include "make-unique.h"
>>  #endif
>>
>> This is because std::make_unique is defined in <memory> in C++14.  This would
>> mean fewer changes once GCC requires C++14 (or later) and this new header is eliminated.
> 
> That's a good idea.
> 
>>> (in the root namespace, rather than std::, which saves a bit more typing).
>>
>> It's less typing now, but it will be more churn once GCC requires C++14 (or later), at
>> which point you'll naturally want to get rid of the custom make_unique.  More churn
>> since make_unique -> std::make_unique may require re-indentation of arguments, etc.
>> For that reason, I would suggest instead to put the function (and any other straight
>> standard library backport) in a 3-letter namespace already, like, gcc::make_unique
>> or gnu::make_unique.  That way, when the time comes that GCC requires C++14,
>> the patch to replace gcc::make_unique won't have to worry about reindenting code,
>> it'll just replace gcc -> std.
> 
> Or (when the time comes) don't change gcc->std and do:
> 
> namespace gcc {
>   using std::make_unique;
> }

It will seem like a pointless indirection then, IMO.

> 
> or just leave it in the global namespace as in your current patch, and
> at a later date add a using-declaration to the global namespace:
> 
> using std::make_unique;
> 

That's not very idiomatic, though.  Let me turn this into a reverse question:

If GCC required C++14 today, would you be doing the above, either importing make_unique
to the global namespace, or into namespace gcc?   I think it's safe to say that, no,
nobody would be doing that.  So once GCC requires C++14, why would you want to preserve
once-backported symbols in a namespace other than std, when you no longer have a reason to?
It will just be another unnecessary thing that newcomers at that future time will have
to learn.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-12 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAH6eHdSnGwtScODMveYha1S5WiDo6YsexN_pRqe9n4vq-Pmkig@mail.gmail.com>
2022-07-12  0:25 ` David Malcolm
2022-07-12  0:25   ` [PATCH 2/2] analyzer: use std::unique_ptr for pending_diagnostic/note David Malcolm
2022-07-12  6:48   ` [PATCH 1/2] Add gcc/make-unique.h Jonathan Wakely
2022-07-12  8:13     ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-10-26 20:40     ` [PATCH v3] " David Malcolm
2022-11-02 21:45       ` Jason Merrill
2022-07-12 13:23   ` [PATCH 1/2] " Pedro Alves
2022-07-12 13:45     ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-07-12 14:06       ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2022-07-12 15:14         ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-07-12 16:40           ` Pedro Alves
2022-07-12 18:22             ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-07-12 18:36               ` Pedro Alves
2022-07-12 18:41                 ` Pedro Alves
2022-07-12 18:58                   ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-07-12 18:59                     ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-07-12 18:50                 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-07-12 18:56                   ` Pedro Alves
2022-07-12 18:36             ` David Malcolm
2022-07-12 18:49               ` Pedro Alves
2022-10-21 16:01 David Malcolm
2022-10-25 23:00 ` David Malcolm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7f2ddb2d-da00-6852-339a-86c7d853087f@palves.net \
    --to=pedro@palves.net \
    --cc=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).