* [PATCH] xtensa: Remove REG_OK_STRICT and its derivatives
[not found] <85e1e1ac-00b1-8fea-34f8-daf1f85299e3.ref@yahoo.co.jp>
@ 2023-03-13 0:37 ` Takayuki 'January June' Suwa
2023-03-13 17:07 ` Max Filippov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Takayuki 'January June' Suwa @ 2023-03-13 0:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GCC Patches; +Cc: Max Filippov
Because GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS was deprecated a long time ago
(see commit c6c3dba931548987c78719180e30ebc863404b89).
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/xtensa/xtensa.h (REG_OK_STRICT, REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_P,
REG_OK_FOR_BASE_P): Remove.
---
gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.h | 11 +----------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.h b/gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.h
index 058602e44ee..8ebf37cab33 100644
--- a/gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.h
+++ b/gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.h
@@ -590,19 +590,10 @@ typedef struct xtensa_args
/* C expressions that are nonzero if X (assumed to be a `reg' RTX) is
valid for use as a base or index register. */
-#ifdef REG_OK_STRICT
-#define REG_OK_STRICT_FLAG 1
-#else
-#define REG_OK_STRICT_FLAG 0
-#endif
-
#define BASE_REG_P(X, STRICT) \
- ((!(STRICT) && REGNO (X) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER) \
+ ((!(STRICT) && ! HARD_REGISTER_P (X)) \
|| REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P (REGNO (X)))
-#define REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_P(X) 0
-#define REG_OK_FOR_BASE_P(X) BASE_REG_P (X, REG_OK_STRICT_FLAG)
-
/* Maximum number of registers that can appear in a valid memory address. */
#define MAX_REGS_PER_ADDRESS 1
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xtensa: Remove REG_OK_STRICT and its derivatives
2023-03-13 0:37 ` [PATCH] xtensa: Remove REG_OK_STRICT and its derivatives Takayuki 'January June' Suwa
@ 2023-03-13 17:07 ` Max Filippov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Max Filippov @ 2023-03-13 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Takayuki 'January June' Suwa; +Cc: GCC Patches
On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 5:37 PM Takayuki 'January June' Suwa
<jjsuwa_sys3175@yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
>
> Because GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS was deprecated a long time ago
> (see commit c6c3dba931548987c78719180e30ebc863404b89).
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/xtensa/xtensa.h (REG_OK_STRICT, REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_P,
> REG_OK_FOR_BASE_P): Remove.
> ---
> gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.h | 11 +----------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
Regtested for target=xtensa-linux-uclibc, no new regressions.
Committed to master.
--
Thanks.
-- Max
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-03-13 17:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <85e1e1ac-00b1-8fea-34f8-daf1f85299e3.ref@yahoo.co.jp>
2023-03-13 0:37 ` [PATCH] xtensa: Remove REG_OK_STRICT and its derivatives Takayuki 'January June' Suwa
2023-03-13 17:07 ` Max Filippov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).